|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 37
Posts: 6,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 37
Posts: 6,344
|
holy shit this is so amazing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
ᅠ
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,655
|
dude i saw this on cringe
yiaess
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 37
Posts: 6,344
|
I love shit that strides that line of intentional/unintentional, the vegan guy would be the best comedian if this weren't serious but you can never tell for sure
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 37
Posts: 6,344
|
the club penguin video is amazing just for how it manages to compile so many things seen as bad simultaneously in a way that's, arguably, unintentionally art
you can take it as a statement on aesthetic objectivity even though the author is obviously not nearly knowledgeable enough to put it that way |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Snivy! Dohoho!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 6,161
|
What is even going on in the Club Penguin video, lmao.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,757
|
keep em coming arch
please
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Dark Chancellor
|
arch I think this is along the lines of what you're talking about, except has no redeeming value
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
moonchild~
|
Soundtrack by Nickelback and Justin Beiber lmao
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Dark Chancellor
|
is it bad the first thing i noticed was the comic sans
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
ごめんなさい (/ω\)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 30
Posts: 2,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Fractals!
|
You realize that the bolded phrase makes it porn, right? There was a supreme court case in the 60s that basically said "if it has no redeeming value, it's porn."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 37
Posts: 6,344
|
that isn't accurate, igotrhythm
a similar argument has been made by sex-negative 3rd and 2nd wave feminists to why sexually objectifying content should be considered porn even without nudity but it relies on a misreading of the criteria, it's not solely a no redeeming value thing also, I feel like the "no redeeming value" argument stigmatizes the visceral and holds up a dualistic view of human experience; even if the only value in porn is its visceral value, I don't think that is "not redeeming" |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
"Reach For The Stars"
|
The vegan guy. dying.
__________________
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|