TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Sidenote, everyone... When do you guys think we should ask for inno child/friendly neighbour claims? Could help narrowing down the setup, and if someone claims, there's a 1/2 chance we have a doctor to protect it. Of course someone could bluff, but I think it could be advantageous to consider it

I have just one question for my unenlightened brain....What is the difference between an innocent child and a friendly neighbor?

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Why not? The less people we are, the more appealing it would be for a wolf to claim it and if they are right, we basically lose the game.

There runs the issue with you having the doctor save the child....In a PERFECT WORLD, this would buy us an extra 48 hours. But the wolves could very well just kill someone outside of the innocent child and kill the innocent child the night after, thus wasting a valuable resource for town

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

There's ALSO the issue that you're bringing up PRs this early into the game that I find slightly concerning

[storn42]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

I have just one question for my unenlightened brain....What is the difference between an innocent child and a friendly neighbor?

according to the setup friendly neighbor is a 1-shot inno child that can only be sent to one person.

[Hateandhatred]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

I have just one question for my unenlightened brain....What is the difference between an innocent child and a friendly neighbor?

For the purpose of my strat, there isn't

also I'm a dumbass, somehow I forgot not everyone would be a power role oops. That means getting an inno child AND a doctor has incredibly low odds

Nvm the strat is trash

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

according to the setup friendly neighbor is a 1-shot inno child that can only be sent to one person.

...So when do you...One shot as an innocent child? I'm very perplexed here...

[storn42]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Friendly Neighbour (1-shot only, alternate of Innocent Child): At night, select a target. In the morning, they will receive the following report:

[User] is a [b]Friendly Neighbour[/b]. Howdy!

..

[storn42]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

anyways, im out for the night. dont do anything *too* crazy while im gone.

unvote

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Not gonna lie, I kinda wanna vote someone that's talking about the setup instead of players, but that's kinda mean.

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

..

If I'm reading this correctly....The friendly neighbor gets to ADVISE SOMEONE that they are an innocent child?

PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong, and I'm 80% sure I'm wrong about this

If that's the case, that is a HUGE deal for us if that's a thing and we should not let that shit be known as early as now

[star-crossed]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Also, to elaborate further on Lewdy's question to me.
I initially picked bugkid over star for a couple reasons.

1.) Bug and I are tight, so there's always the friendly poke.

2.) Bug is also newer, and based on what I know of them, I'd argue more emotional in their gameplay compared to star - who we have seen is a very calculated, logical player. Bug would then be easier to read a reaction off of for that.

3.) I was also going to move off of bug onto star if star hadn't yet arrived, but while I was off doing Survivor Edgic, star showed up (and evidently everyone else).

I see T-Force has not figured out how to exploit my emotions yet.

You thought through your votes quite a bit eh? So for point 2, anything you want to add about your perception of their reaction?

[Hateandhatred]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Not gonna lie, I kinda wanna vote someone that's talking about the setup instead of players, but that's kinda mean.

The setup is information, what are you talking about?

It's not mean, it's counter productive.

Also doesn't mean we can't talk about players either.

Using "they talk about teh setups lulz" as an excuse to vote someone makes you look bad, it's not like you're trying to solve the game but instead you're trying to find reasons to vote for people. Definitely on the sus side there Kukulynas

[T-Force]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

i mean, i kind of do want to open this door, but idk that ghostkid is the way to do it.

Ghost kid? Not bugghost?
They'd become a literal Shedinja. That rocks.

For the purpose of my strat, there isn't

also I'm a dumbass, somehow I forgot not everyone would be a power role oops. That means getting an inno child AND a doctor has incredibly low odds

Nvm the strat is trash

Nice save, Halak.

I see T-Force has not figured out how to exploit my emotions yet.

You thought through your votes quite a bit eh? So for point 2, anything you want to add about your perception of their reaction?

According to Discord, you and I have shared... 199 DMs to each other not counting group chats.

Bug and I have... 31,181. So, no, I don't know how to "exploit" your's. At least not in comparison to someone whom I've spent a lot of time chatting with and learning who they are.

You give me too much credit. My thought was like.. 30 seconds, lol.
But yeah, I thought their reaction was desperate, in a sense.
Like, they were very worried about arriving late - and thinking that EoD was tonight - which makes me feel like they felt pressure to show up and provide content immediately (see: reads list).

[Hateandhatred]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Nice save, Halak.

[T-Force]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

The setup is information, what are you talking about?

It's not mean, it's counter productive.

Also doesn't mean we can't talk about players either.

Using "they talk about teh setups lulz" as an excuse to vote someone makes you look bad, it's not like you're trying to solve the game but instead you're trying to find reasons to vote for people. Definitely on the sus side there Kukulynas

You were all on board with Haku finding a tiny reason to vote people earlier; why now are you flipping your perspective on Haku for that?