TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

[Hateandhatred]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

Also I'm not sure who to park a vote on between lurker and haku for this phase, but I'm'a do haku simply for survivability lol

haku

[lurker]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

Sorry I still do not know what point you are trying to make. The only point I am trying to make is that it is mod confirmed that our Day 0 posts were from before the game we are currently playing started, which is a factor in considering how much we should care about Day 0.

i don't believe this and am happy to get voted for not believing this

[star-crossed]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

i don't believe this and am happy to get voted for not believing this

I did find that T-Force described the time frame before Night 1 as being "a phase." It just seems to not have been a real Day phase, and it was before the time he declares the game to have started.

I am not saying that I sus you, I am just trying to clarify what seems to be the public information we have.

[roundbox]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

i don't believe this and am happy to get voted for not believing this

I'm with you on this one

hateandhatred's reentry was refreshingly more substantial than I thought it was gonna be
I like it

[star-crossed]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

I am sorry, but I do not find the way that you are posting today to be natural. hateandhatred

So storny daniels was silenced by someone, gee I wonder who

Trump

In all seriousness...



I hate to say this, but this is a bit suspicious. It could be an innocent comment, but I find the bolded statement to imply that Haku might be thinking he's not at risk of a night kill, and that his main objective is just to vote someone. I haven't played a whole lot of TWG with or without Haku, but those of you who have more experience playing with him, can you please share if this is normal town behavior for him?

If he is scum, he might have strategically left his vote on Xelnya, maybe thinking that a vote on him generally doesn't look too bad.

I understand that Haku won't be around to defend himself on this, but that could be a lead?

I believe you have played at least four games with him? That is more than I have played with about half of you, for what it is worth.

I think it is possible to interpret it as a slip in mindset like you are questioning it is, but I can understand why he would say it either way. So it is not a bad thing to bring up by any means. Just the way you have brought it up seems really careful and crafted, which throws me off because you seem like you are naturally more casual than that. It is also not how I remember you approaching things the only time I played with you, though that was years ago.

Overall I do not feel great about the read list either. The main part I liked was that you said Haku's vote on you was decent. XD

[lurker]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

I did find that T-Force described the time frame before Night 1 as being "a phase." It just seems to not have been a real Day phase, and it was before the time he declares the game to have started.

I am not saying that I sus you, I am just trying to clarify what seems to be the public information we have.

ok so like here's my thing about d0 not counting
i find haku's decision to 1. park his vote "randomly" in a game with no phantom votes, then 2. lie about his availability to change his vote, to be extremely suspicious in isolation
however, this behavior becomes more suspicious, not less, when taken in conjunction with his d0 activity, in which he made a bizarre quasi dumbtell then inexplicably changed his vote at the last second
my question, then, is whether i should disregard my suspicion on the grounds that d0 actively adds to my concerns, even though his activity in this phase alone is vote-worthy in my eyes
if that is the case then i am voting you because, if we are meant to disregard d0 material, then that means you have posted more than anyone else here while saying nothing

[roundbox]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

I just don't like the xel read from hateandhatred

I see nothing notable from xel that would make me say "yeah, town!"
it's sideline commentary, random setup clarification, and quips

it's not even that shitposty

[T-Force]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

VOTE COUNT
Hateandhatred: 2 - Hakulyte (280), star-crossed (320)
Hakulyte: 2 - lurker (290), Hateandhatred (316)
-
Yet to vote: roundbox, bugkid666, FreezinIce, XelNya, flashflash account

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to insta.

-

There are 34 minutes remaining.

[Hateandhatred]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

I am sorry, but I do not find the way that you are posting today to be natural. hateandhatred

I believe you have played at least four games with him? That is more than I have played with about half of you, for what it is worth.

Well, I pretty much just woke up then immediately went to thread, so that can contribute to weird posting.

I've played quite a few games with Haku actually, but I feel like people who have played dozens of games with him can actually get a feel for his in-game behavior far more than I can. Also, Haku and I are IRL friends, and this makes it a little harder for me to judge him according to his TWG metagame.

I think it is possible to interpret it as a slip in mindset like you are questioning it is, but I can understand why he would say it either way. So it is not a bad thing to bring up by any means. Just the way you have brought it up seems really careful and crafted, which throws me off because you seem like you are naturally more casual than that. It is also not how I remember you approaching things the only time I played with you, though that was years ago.

Overall I do not feel great about the read list either. The main part I liked was that you said Haku's vote on you was decent. XD

Yeah I'm fairly self aware that I might sound a little off, especially in comparison to how I played the game a couple years back. That, plus the fact that Haku knows me very well IRL, him throwing a vote on me just looks good lol

[star-crossed]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

ok so like here's my thing about d0 not counting
i find haku's decision to 1. park his vote "randomly" in a game with no phantom votes, then 2. lie about his availability to change his vote, to be extremely suspicious in isolation
however, this behavior becomes more suspicious, not less, when taken in conjunction with his d0 activity, in which he made a bizarre quasi dumbtell then inexplicably changed his vote at the last second
my question, then, is whether i should disregard my suspicion on the grounds that d0 actively adds to my concerns, even though his activity in this phase alone is vote-worthy in my eyes
if that is the case then i am voting you because, if we are meant to disregard d0 material, then that means you have posted more than anyone else here while saying nothing

Is the availability lie that he said "See you next phase" and then had a few posts after that like 11 hours later? Because unless I am getting time zones confused, I think that his last time of posting was the time he said at the start it would be:

Fun fact; I'll only be available tonight and like 10min tomorrow around 15:15 EST where I will have to vote if I didn't and then poof I'll miss EoD because I have to leave to work and I won't be back until phase is over.

This is going to happen the entire week.

As I have said, I think that he is behaving erratically because he feels stressed about not having enough information and interactions to work with, and I have a slightly easier time mapping that my past town experiences with him.

The thing he posted today that bothered me most/what I wish I could ask about, was saying specifically "Xel was town" past tense, because the progression there is confusing at best.

I don't really have a better way to restate what I am meaning with bringing up T-Force's posts, so we should probably agree to partially disagree.

[FreezinIce]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

Why was there no d1 kill

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

I find this surprising because of your explanation of how the whole applicant-Haku debacle from Day 0 played out. Can you explain this?

storn seemed to jump on the bandwagon (that I started) to get haku out really quickly, and then pretty effortlessly changed his vote to someone else later, that's all. obvs not worth a whole lot since he flipped and I think it's a safe assumption to make that we all rolled town at the start.

that being said, I also really like hate's reentry. roundbox is less sussy for me atm, all good posts imo.

what I do not like is star behavior right now. it feels very odd and out of character for her (this has little to do with asking me the question above)

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

it feels very odd and out of character for her (this has little to do with asking me the question above)

what I mean by this is that my opinion does not come from her asking me the question about storn

[flashflash account]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

Why was there no d1 kill

I think day 1 was a meme and not real/everyone thought they were "applicants" which I interpreted as being vt although in hindsight haku pointing out the sign up list showed everyone as applicants makes this gimmick kind of obvious

[lurker]

Re: TWG 202 - GAME THREAD

Why was there no d1 kill

incorrect terminology please rephrase