Re: TWG CXLIII: SK Loses Again Game Thread
Reading through rzr's post, I realized that I didn't respond and look at this at all. The original point you bring up has already been discussed to death. The reason why I brought up setup details early in the phase was to quell any theorycrafting or setupcrafting since it would be a waste of time in addition to being potentially misleading. I tried to do this last C9++ game which also had an IC right off the bat, and I ended up going too deep into the rabbit hole. Also, analyzing the setup is just part of my play style. Why wouldn't I make it my first priority?
I was just the first person to mention it, and wanted to be the only one that really mentioned it today before people got off track. All I did was acknowledge that piece of data. It's not making theories, it's acknowledging the data there and the two possibilities that come with it.
Reading through rzr's post, I realized that I didn't respond and look at this at all. The original point you bring up has already been discussed to death. The reason why I brought up setup details early in the phase was to quell any theorycrafting or setupcrafting since it would be a waste of time in addition to being potentially misleading. I tried to do this last C9++ game which also had an IC right off the bat, and I ended up going too deep into the rabbit hole. Also, analyzing the setup is just part of my play style. Why wouldn't I make it my first priority?
I was just the first person to mention it, and wanted to be the only one that really mentioned it today before people got off track. All I did was acknowledge that piece of data. It's not making theories, it's acknowledging the data there and the two possibilities that come with it.















Comment