TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Jesus Christ you had all better be lying about your roles

false. it is pinpointing the town pool which in turn polarizes the wolf pool. with the mafia roleblocker dead, you can no longer fake such a role if there is one. my role only exists based on another role, so all this information clears town members and isolates liars.

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

i don't like italics

[yo man im awesome]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

So, what, now it's suddenly a good thing to proclaim roles? In my first human game, I was critized heavily for coming out as whatever the hell my role was that game.

Also, cedolad

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

no one said to claim

[yo man im awesome]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

no one said to claim

That's what I was thinking. That post you made quoting AC1 had me confused for a second.

[Vendetta21]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

if cedo is vig, my role means it has to be this

which would necessitate the last role being a one-shot V and having already fired on a human seeming person on night 1

or in other words we're at like 99% certainty of serial killer

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

now if there is the following role present: mason, 1 shot roleblocker, or 1 shot doctor, then cedo was lying

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Yoman, I swear, you're like fucking Phoebe

At my old school, we never used to use theorems...

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

and if he was a town claiming vig then he is just fucking up any sort of mechanic analysis. anyways back to reviewing posts let's doooooooooo this

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

now if there is the following role present: mason, 1 shot roleblocker, or 1 shot doctor, then cedo was lying

and if no one claims one of these roles, then i suggest lynching elsewhere than cedo

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

and by claim i just mean states they have it u don't have to give your specific role. because if you do this, then cedo is the obvious lynch. and if he flips green, you will be next

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

^meant flips vig obv

[Tps222]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Quote:

Originally Posted by j-rodd123
now if there is the following role present: mason, 1 shot roleblocker, or 1 shot doctor, then cedo was lying

and if no one claims one of these roles, then i suggest lynching elsewhere than cedo

In light of that, Vic, can you explain

I have a question to fojar; are masons together considered one blue or each considered one?

[j-rodd123]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

^wow that went right over my head. good find, town points for you.

i would love to hear your explanation vic

[cedolad]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

breaking up thoughts as i go. it's kind of weird cedo kept his vote on me at the end of the phase instead of joining a wagon. why did you do this cedo? thinning votes like that is a pet peeve of mine

just saw this, actually by the time I had posted before dance's lynch, it was 2 to lynch. I was eventually going to bandwagon on by the morning if dance ever gave a response, but jayde and zoshi beat me to it. My initial vote on you was because of a similar situation when freaky was 2 to lynch, and I had asked for your input, and then you changed your vote to dance, and I never changed to a no lynch.