Re: What Prompts Violence In Society?
There's a very large danger in pointing to the subjectivity of morality. If your morals aren't any more correct than mine, why should I ever respect yours? The suggestion is made that if my morals say that it is okay to kill you for stepping on my foot, that perhaps if you step on my foot, in some cases it is -right- for me to kill you, even if you personally disagree.
What morality is the legal system pointing to when it says what is and is not acceptable behavior? If not an absolute morality that is objective, is it simply the whim of lawmakers' personal morality? The general consensus morality of the people? If I feel a law is unjust or immoral, why am I obliged to follow it anyway or face consequences?
An interest question that follows: Ought someone potentially be able to forfiet all the protections of law, in order to no longer be constrained by that law?
There's a very large danger in pointing to the subjectivity of morality. If your morals aren't any more correct than mine, why should I ever respect yours? The suggestion is made that if my morals say that it is okay to kill you for stepping on my foot, that perhaps if you step on my foot, in some cases it is -right- for me to kill you, even if you personally disagree.
What morality is the legal system pointing to when it says what is and is not acceptable behavior? If not an absolute morality that is objective, is it simply the whim of lawmakers' personal morality? The general consensus morality of the people? If I feel a law is unjust or immoral, why am I obliged to follow it anyway or face consequences?
An interest question that follows: Ought someone potentially be able to forfiet all the protections of law, in order to no longer be constrained by that law?




Comment