Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DossarLX ODI
    Batch Manager
    Game Manager
    FFR Simfile Author
    • Mar 2008
    • 14999

    #1

    Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

    Recently there has been a wave of anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation being filed in several states in the U.S. specifically attacking the rights of not only those people, but also potentially having a ripple effect in general.

    Just today, Florida House filed a bill (HB 1223: Public PreK-12 Educational Institution and Instruction Requirements) to prohibit use of preferred pronouns. I was apparently the first person to save an archive link of this page.

    Archive Screenshot
    Page Screenshot
    Bill PDF page about prohibiting use of preferred pronouns

    The specific text:
    (3) An employee or contractor of a public K-12 educational
    institution may not provide to a student his or her preferred
    personal title or pronouns if such preferred personal title or
    pronouns do not correspond to his or her sex.
    (4) A student may not be asked by an employee or
    contractor of a public K-12 educational institution to provide
    his or her preferred personal title or pronouns or be penalized
    or subjected to adverse or discriminatory treatment for not
    providing his or her preferred personal title or pronouns.
    This is just going to make the situation worse for students and teachers.

    And it doesn't stop there: Tennessee has also been on the move to ban drag shows, and some other states like Texas are trying to follow suit.

    Tennessee Drag Race queens slam state's 'blatantly unconstitutional' drag ban bill: 'Drag brings joy'
    Republican legislators introduce new laws to crack down on drag shows

    This has been on the rise after numerous story hours have happened about drag.

    You can see the Tennessee Bill here.

    Quoted text of the bill in below spoiler.

    BILL SUMMARY
    This bill creates an offense for a person who engages in an adult cabaret performance on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult. The bill defines an "adult cabaret performance" to mean a performance in a location other than an adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration.

    A first violation of this offense is a Class A misdemeanor, and a second or subsequent violation of this offense is a Class E felony.

    This bill also expressly:

    (1) Preempts an ordinance, regulation, restriction, or license that was lawfully adopted or issued by a political subdivision prior to July 1, 2023, that is in conflict with this bill; and

    (2) Prevents or preempts a political subdivision from enacting and enforcing in the future other ordinances, regulations, restrictions, or licenses that are in conflict with this bill.

    ON FEBRUARY 9, 2023, THE SENATE ADOPTED AMENDMENT #1 AND PASSED SENATE BILL 3, AS AMENDED.

    AMENDMENT #1 rewrites this bill and creates an offense for a person who engages in adult cabaret entertainment on public property or in a location where the adult cabaret entertainment could be viewed by a person who is not an adult. This amendment defines "adult cabaret entertainment" as adult-oriented performances that are harmful to minors, as such term is defined under present law; feature go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators, or similar entertainers; and include a single performance or multiple performances by an entertainer. An "entertainer" means a person who provides:

    (1) Entertainment within an adult-oriented establishment, regardless of whether a fee is charged or accepted for entertainment and regardless of whether entertainment is provided as an employee, escort, or an independent contractor; or

    (2) Adult cabaret entertainment, regardless of whether a fee is charged or accepted for entertainment and regardless of whether entertainment is provided as an employee or an independent contractor.

    Present law defines "harmful to minors" as that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence, or sadomasochistic abuse when the matter or performance:

    (1) Would be found by the average person applying contemporary community standards to appeal predominantly to the prurient, shameful, or morbid interests of minors;

    (2) Is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable for minors; and

    (3) Taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific values for minors.

    A first violation of this offense is a Class A misdemeanor, and a second or subsequent violation of this offense is a Class E felony.

    This amendment also expressly:

    (1) Preempts an ordinance, regulation, restriction, or license that was lawfully adopted or issued by a political subdivision prior to April 1, 2023, that is in conflict with this amendment; and

    (2) Prevents or preempts a political subdivision from enacting and enforcing in the future other ordinances, regulations, restrictions, or licenses that are in conflict with this amendment.

    ON FEBRUARY 23, 2023, THE HOUSE SUBSTITUTED SENATE BILL 3 FOR HOUSE BILL 9. ADOPTED AMENDENT #1, AND PASSED SENATE BILL 3, AS AMENDED.

    AMENDMENT #1 incorporates the changes made by Senate Amendment #1 with the following differences:

    (1) This amendment restores language specifying that adult-oriented entertainment featuring topless dancers is a form of adult cabaret entertainment; and

    (2) This amendment revises part of the definition of "entertainer" by replacing provision of adult cabaret entertainment with provision of a performance of actual or simulated specified sexual activities regardless of whether a fee is charged or accepted for the performance and regardless of whether the performance is provided as an employee or an independent contractor.


    The Florida one I mentioned was literally just from today, and these bills can sneak their way without much attention. But these attacks are real and happening.

    Please keep LGBTQIA+ people in mind during these times, and be supportive as you can.
    Last edited by DossarLX ODI; 02-28-2023, 07:21 PM.
    Originally posted by hi19hi19
    oh boy, it's STIFF, I'll stretch before I sit down at the computer so not I'm not as STIFF next time I step a file
  • sff_writer_dan
    FFR Player
    • Aug 2020
    • 135

    #2
    Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

    I was amused to see one of the anti-drag bills actually being opposed by a republican, and wondering why on Earth that might happen, and then it turned out they own a promotion company that, among other things, does Pro Wrestling, which -very often- would fall afoul of how absurdly broad and vague those laws are.

    Comment

    • mi40
      FFR Simfile Author
      • Aug 2008
      • 3655

      #3
      Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

      cool

      Comment

      • M0nkeyz
        Simfile Judge
        FFR Simfile Author
        • May 2013
        • 482

        #4
        Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

        Originally posted by mi40
        cool
        what?

        Comment

        • Lights
          Spooky Password: Demon6
          Community Manager
          Event Staff
          FFR Simfile Author
          Global Moderator
          • Jun 2020
          • 440

          #5
          Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

          :c Eat a butt, Florida, Tennessee, and Texas.

          Comment

          • Black_Shield
            Local Kiryu impersonator
            • Mar 2016
            • 159

            #6
            Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

            quite shitty.


            -----------------
            Stats: (spread)
            3 Billion Achieved(and Veteran): July 31, 2022
            4 Billion Achieved: April 1, 2023
            5 Billion Achieved: July 27, 2023
            Otaku Speedvibe [HEAVY]: December 5, 2023
            Best AAA: Lunar Eclipse - a antion of moon #6 (51)
            Best BF: Teeny Weeny String Bikini (54)
            Best SDG: One Big Beautiful Sound (60)
            Best FC: Hero's Theme (65)

            Comment

            • Hateandhatred
              "The Quebec Steparatist."
              FFR Simfile Author
              • Feb 2011
              • 1974

              #7
              Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

              I'd be very curious to see the flipside of these. Like... What was their motive?

              Surely they didn't just think it was a society problem. I mean, I'm sure a lot of uber conservative politicians do think that, but actually acting on it also sounds like PR suicide.

              I feel sorry for people who are going to be affected by this.
              Forgot where I put my old sig lol

              Comment

              • DossarLX ODI
                Batch Manager
                Game Manager
                FFR Simfile Author
                • Mar 2008
                • 14999

                #8
                Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                Iowa attempted to put forward a bill to ban same-sex marriage.


                Link to the bill.
                Information pertaining to the Iowa Legislature as well as the Executive and Judicial branch in as much as they relate to the legislative branch


                Originally posted by Hateandhatred
                actually acting on it also sounds like PR suicide.
                Not when you have a supreme court that overturned Roe v. Wade with no concern about privacy, providing prenatal care, or improving sexual health.
                Last edited by DossarLX ODI; 03-1-2023, 03:12 PM.
                Originally posted by hi19hi19
                oh boy, it's STIFF, I'll stretch before I sit down at the computer so not I'm not as STIFF next time I step a file

                Comment

                • radioamor
                  anhedonia extraordinaire
                  • Jun 2020
                  • 154

                  #9
                  Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                  Originally posted by Hateandhatred
                  I'd be very curious to see the flipside of these. Like... What was their motive?

                  Surely they didn't just think it was a society problem. I mean, I'm sure a lot of uber conservative politicians do think that, but actually acting on it also sounds like PR suicide.

                  I feel sorry for people who are going to be affected by this.
                  You could reasonably infer the origin of this legislation to be severely out-of-touch politicians trying desperately to appeal to their militantly right-wing constituents as a means to remain in office and, therefore, in power, but that sounds convenient and simple.
                  This is speculation insofar as I haven't bothered to do any research on the topic (and, since this is a casual forum and not a political journal, I'm not going to perform that step right now), but the average constituent awareness of LGBTQIA+ existence and especially drag shows seemed limited until recently. Then you get a gamut of cable/broadcast news networks cherry-picking isolated incidents and spinning the veritable fuck out of otherwise inconsequential realities like drag shows and trans athletes to their viewers and, suddenly, you have a useful contingent of Very Angry People. That stratum of people proceeds to get loud on social media and in the general direction of their local government, and bonkers legislation like this is put on the table.
                  Motives for this brand of nonsense remain obfuscated, although "white male evangelicals trying to establish a white male evangelical state" doesn't seem terribly outlandish. Advertisement-based news programming has shredded journalism into an embarrassing deluge of reactionary content, and while all of it is editorialized propaganda, the networks supporting this drivel (FOX, OANN, Newsmax) appear to be especially sensationalist.

                  Unfortunately, there is a large volume of people that remains vehemently anti-LGBTQIA+, so for any politician who seeks to perfunctorily expand their rapport with their constituents, simply showing minority populations the legislative middle finger is enough to get them cheering. The antonym of PR suicide, if you will.
                  Last edited by radioamor; 03-1-2023, 04:42 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Matthia
                    🍍Pineapple Man🍍
                    FFR Simfile Author
                    • Nov 2017
                    • 511

                    #10
                    Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                    politicians try to mind their own business impossible challenge



                    Comment

                    • Pizza69
                      Retired Staff
                      FFR Simfile Author
                      • Aug 2013
                      • 700

                      #11
                      Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                      Originally posted by DossarLX ODI
                      Iowa attempted to put forward a bill to ban same-sex marriage.


                      Link to the bill.
                      Information pertaining to the Iowa Legislature as well as the Executive and Judicial branch in as much as they relate to the legislative branch




                      Not when you have a supreme court that overturned Roe v. Wade with no concern about privacy, providing prenatal care, or improving sexual health.
                      bit more than just same-sex marriage--it also specifies biological male and biological female, so there's a dollop of transphobia in there too

                      Comment

                      • _choof
                        Banned
                        FFR Simfile Author
                        • Jun 2022
                        • 176

                        #12
                        Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                        Originally posted by M0nkeyz
                        what?
                        psst mi40 has always been homophobic

                        Comment

                        • Funnygurl555
                          T-Force's Rival
                          • Dec 2010
                          • 1865

                          #13
                          Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                          Originally posted by Lights
                          :c Eat a butt, Florida, Tennessee, and Texas.
                          don't threaten them with a good time
                          Originally posted by MixMasterLar
                          is funny eaman?
                          Can you like not use those stupid names right now? Took me long enough to get these screen names straight in my head
                          Originally posted by the sun fan
                          GET DUNKED FUNNY
                          (eaman is her name irl, friend)

                          Comment

                          • Jade5_
                            FFR Player
                            • Apr 2022
                            • 66

                            #14
                            Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                            Originally posted by Lights
                            :c Eat a butt, Florida, Tennessee, and Texas.
                            cool

                            Comment

                            • gold stinger
                              Signature Extraordinare~~
                              Event Staff
                              Game Manager
                              FFR Simfile Author
                              FFR Music Producer
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 6428

                              #15
                              Re: Anti-LGBTQIA+ legislation staying lowkey but with big impact

                              Just let people do whatever the fuck they want to do behind closed doors, jesus christ. As long as it's not hurting anyone.

                              The problem with the whole ordeal imo, is that it's a general expectation of respect 'outside of closed doors', to get someone's preferred pronouns correct. Start mis-gendering intentionally because of beliefs, and you're kind of validating yourself as an asshole wanting to stir shit. Same the other way around, they get emotional and defensive from mis-gendering accidentally and all of a sudden, they're the asshole here.

                              Stuff regarding drag is VERY unfortunate. That is more than just something people enjoy or are more comfortable with, and is sometimes a job.
                              Originally posted by YoshL
                              butts.


                              - Tosh 2014






                              Comment

                              Working...