Imagine There's A Gamble Where

**top** · 10-21-2013, 10:05 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

100% fuck that shit

**Choofers** · 10-21-2013, 10:07 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

I'm a Las Vegas native.

I know what gambling does to people, leonid.

and to have you make light of it just makes me sick.

**leonid** · 10-21-2013, 10:08 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

I will prolly go for 95% or something

**Wayward Vagabond** · 10-21-2013, 10:09 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

does this have to do with some new google service you're working on because i don't like where this is going

**Choofers** · 10-21-2013, 10:09 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

new yt feature, double your views or get all your videos deleted

**L.B.D.D** · 10-21-2013, 10:09 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

70%

**Choofers** · 10-21-2013, 10:10 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

t͈̤̤̗̦̘͢h̨̥̺̦̭i̥s̤̪͡ ̛i̶̲s̩̪̙̻̮̭ ̗̜j̸̠̠̯̹ú̘st̜͈̬͟ͅ ͎̟͙̩ṭhe͎̘ͅ ͏͕̖͍̰b̮͉͙̤e̥̙̩̬g̡͙̺͕̬̼͙͔i̶n͔̝̤͠n̩̘͉̲in̦̣͇͈̳g̴̯̪͇͇̗̺

**leonid** · 10-21-2013, 10:10 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

nope but I do like how people relate to google every single thing I do

it's like i'm a walking google

in fact i'm a mere engineer that can be replaced any time

**Guest15937** · 10-21-2013, 10:11 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

100%, hands down (pardon the pun). This simply isn't a bet I could take.

**One Winged Angel** · 10-21-2013, 10:12 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

Nope, never.

I've seen roulette wheels spin the same colour 20+ times in a row and a bunch of other bullshit at casinos, fuck probability.

**DossarLX ODI** · 10-21-2013, 10:18 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

101%

**qqwref** · 10-21-2013, 10:18 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

It would have to be pretty dang high (in the 90%s, I think). I could recover from losing all my monetary assets, but I really really wouldn't want to have to.

**Reincarnate** · 10-21-2013, 10:19 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

Edit: misread the question

I'll say 99.99%

If this were one time that is. Iterated version would go higher obv.

**ilikexd** · 10-21-2013, 10:23 PM

Re: Imagine There's A Gamble Where

The numbers are kind of arbitrary, but having no wealth would be about 20 times worse than having as much wealth as I have now; having twice as much wealth as I have now would be about 1.5 times better. So no wealth would be a loss of 19, and double wealth would be a gain of .5

.5 * x > 19 * (100-x) where 'x' is the chance of winning
approximately 97.4%

The % you'd reasonably be willing to accept depends on how much you value the change in wealth to no wealth and wealth to double wealth.

Imagine There's A Gamble Where

Imagine There's A Gamble Where

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment