Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Re: Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
Not my fault if your rules are not good, now you'll have to abide and deal w/it


Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
i might step james blake for this (paging rog)~*~Lurkadurk - 1134-7796-6967~*~

Comment
-
Re: Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
I just sent in a file for this. First file since FFRCP3 actually. And that file was terrible.
Hopefully I redeem myself with thisComment
-
Re: Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
theme of hawkeye (ferrari)
we in pack now
blah blah blah (moches) - def accept w/ minor fix
holy shit this is fun and my friends LOVED it so much (esp the u know what mine parts)
only thing i'd like is for the parts where she goes "blah" and "na na na" that have rly short holds to have longer holds and for the fading out part (ex. 45s) you can have holds that get progressively longer to emphasize the fade out instead
otherwise this is a shining example of a file that this pack needs
shanghai flight (skor) - accept w/ lots of fixes
beginning ~ 12s: if you have holds with increasing length depending on the strenght of the sound that would be awesome
27.5s: put a hold on either left or right note on the hand here and drag it to around 28.5seconds and then put a hold on the up note and drag that for about an 8th of a note
29s ~ 33s: instead of jumps, i think it'd be better if you had a single note with a hold that goes on for about a 12th of a note instead
33.04s ~ 35.78s: i think if you use [24] or [13] jumps here it might be better, your preference though
35.783s ~ 37.155s: uh this 32nd trill is a no-no, if you want to step all the sounds here remove the jumps completely and do 32nd rolls instead, trills + jumps are a big nono, and so is jumps here
you missed a note at 38.183s after the right note
38.5s ~ end of song: you dont step some sounds here but i think it'd better if you did since the file is hard enough to warrant those notes anyways, i'm talking about the sounds at 40.9s + 41.1s and 41.62s + 41.79s and 46.612s + 46.440s for example
48.126s ~ 49.497s // 70s ~ 71.44s // 81s ~ end: dont step the holds like this please, leave room between the holds and the next hold, and also i disagree with stepping this part like this, add in different jumps like [13] and [24] to emphasize the varying sounds here, that would be MUCH better
54.98s ~ 58.7s: step the vocals please
59.097s: you can probably use holds or mines here to emphasize the spin
the end could use a hold too
clumsy thoughts (bmah) - accept with minor fixes
--heavy--
PLEASE remove the hands during the bursty 24th parts, they are too much to handle compared to the rest of the song, jumps i think should be fine though but some parts are heavily loaded before and after the burst so look into removing hands into jumps/maybe even single notes near those parts if there are audible BANGS and BOOMS
remove the mines completely imo (ex. 11s ~ 14s) - during these parts instead, utilize holds imo since you decided to not step the background sounds as rolls but instead 8ths
burst near 106s: i think removing the jump in the middle and making these straight rolls 1234 1234 would be better, friend had an extremely hard time comprehending this part
ending 10 notes: maybe add some holds at the end? idk
cross glaxy (rparty89) - fixes needed
idk about the chart but the song is really nice, you have too many difficulty spikes, i feel like if you vary up your layering a bit more (and excluding hands) would result in a much better simfile, also try to vary up which sounds are dominant in your layering - you dont have to follow the main melody all the time - i sort of wish this file was consistently harder by a tiny bit and toned down way more in the harder bursty parts that you had, the idea is good - you just need better execution now (ex. 83s ~ 100s is way too empty considering that the song is near its climax) (ex. 3s ~ 52s is way too empty as well in most parts, you can definitely follow more sounds than this while lowering the difficulty spikes)
rain (valor) - accept w/ fixes + easier chart
make an easier chart please!!! (just like wat necros said)
like, way easier chart
anyhow, my only problem with chart is it gets kinda reppp at the end so if you could vary up the 24th patterns a LOT more (instead of having it based around trills with jumps added here and there) that'd be great
(56s ~ 61s - i think you can do something seriously cooler with this section than just jumps + hands, look into using holds to accentuate the dragged out vocals here idk)
overall since the song doesnt change too much i feel like if we had some color + hold gimmicks here and there it would help out a lot more, make that easier chart though
for the win (thesilentlord) - accept w/ some fixes
--- if you could also add an easier chart with toned down stuff and emphasis on vocals & easy 8ths that would be GREAT!
the song stays constant throughout, so i think it is a bad idea to chart the same sounds with similar patterns for the entire duration of the song
what i think you should do instead, is build up the song and what i mean by that is..
39s ~ 55s: don't step every sound, instead have something like 8ths instead (no 16ths)
55s ~ 69s: good layering
72s: missing hold here bro
73s ~ 74s: the right hand jack is too much, make this a trill instead
74s ~ 106s: missing vocal holds here and there, listen more carefully, also it is HARD for people to hit notes while holding down a note ON THE SAME HAND. what i mean by this is, if you have a hold on 3 (the up note) while having them hit notes on 4 (the right note), it is EXTREMELY unfriendly and uncomfortable to hit most of the time, change up your patterns to reflect this fact. layering is fine. remember to include vocals - with all these conditions it might be hard to step the file properly but you can still fulfill all of these conditions. the rule to having a hold and a note on the same hand shouldn't apply when it's a jump at the starting position of the hold (ex. you hit a jump 34 and you begin holding 4 but for the next second or two there are no notes on 3)
106s: cut the song here, that would be betterLast edited by mi40; 06-13-2013, 07:26 AM.
Comment
-
Re: Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
My comments in bold. Thanks for the feedback.for the win (thesilentlord) - accept w/ some fixes
--- if you could also add an easier chart with toned down stuff and emphasis on vocals & easy 8ths that would be GREAT!
I'll see what I can come up with. I've never stepped super easy songs so i'm not sure how to emphasize the rhythm without using more 16ths. Giving it a try, though. If it's gonna be a really easy one would removing the holds be a good idea? They seem to often confuse beginners.
the song stays constant throughout, so i think it is a bad idea to chart the same sounds with similar patterns for the entire duration of the song
what i think you should do instead, is build up the song and what i mean by that is...
39s ~ 55s: don't step every sound, instead have something like 8ths instead (no 16ths)
At the moment 39-55 is the same as 55-69 but only without the jump at the start of each piece of melody. I'm just a bit afraid it will become actually too easy/boring, at least when we consider the harder part in 74-106. No big objections, though. I'll probably wait what the rest of the judges think.
55s ~ 69s: good layering
72s: missing hold here bro
I mostly stepped holds for the melody and 72 is a drumhit. Though it starts a build up immediately after... I guess I'll settle with a hold as it is the end of that part of the song.
73s ~ 74s: the right hand jack is too much, make this a trill instead
I was wondering between a jack and a trill before submitting. I'll do it.
74s ~ 106s: missing vocal holds here and there, listen more carefully,
It's actually on purpose. If you look closely you will see that the longer vocals are holds and the shorter ones (the ones which last only 1 beat) are not. I originally stepped it as all holds but IMO it became too difficult with the drums also there. I'll play with it a bit and see if I can make it work.
also it is HARD for people to hit notes while holding down a note ON THE SAME HAND. what i mean by this is, if you have a hold on 3 (the up note) while having them hit notes on 4 (the right note), it is EXTREMELY unfriendly and uncomfortable to hit most of the time, change up your patterns to reflect this fact. layering is fine. remember to include vocals - with all these conditions it might be hard to step the file properly but you can still fulfill all of these conditions. the rule to having a hold and a note on the same hand shouldn't apply when it's a jump at the starting position of the hold (ex. you hit a jump 34 and you begin holding 4 but for the next second or two there are no notes on 3)
With all the holds this will limit the pattern choice quite a bit but is probably better for newer players. Avoiding jacks when the hold changes will be difficult though. On the longer holds (those 4 beat long ones) I feel it's better to utilize all the 3 free keys for the rhythm because it will be dull if you just go [hold 3]1212 212121 121[release 3]
106s: cut the song here, that would be better
106-121 is the same as 55-69 (just mirrored). I guess the file could do without it. Although the song is uncut and I would prefer to leave it as the last part makes for a more epic ending. If I can get a comment on this from the other judges it would be easier to decide.Comment
-
Re: Stepping Stones of Stepmania (Submissions Open!)
I'm actually testing it right now and it seems that you are right. I'll step all the vocals as holds from 74 to 106.
Comment
-
Comment








Comment