Harry Potter & The Half Blood Prince (SPOILERS)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tnyhwk900
    FFR Player
    FFR Simfile Author
    • May 2003
    • 4106

    #16
    Vash, there are only 6 Horcruxes. The 7th part of his soul is Voldemort himself. Besides, that makes no sense. Voldemort wanted to kill Harry, not put his soul in him.

    ...Wait.

    He does have his traits (parseltongue) and Dumbledore did mention he might have needed a last Horcrux before he killed Harry. OH SHIT, remember how Dumbledore said they could be put into living things? Maybe Voldemort meant to half-kill Harry, enabling him to split his soul and put it there? This would explain how he became weak...

    Fuck. Rowling has got something gigantic going here. The 7th book is going to have to be huge to cover all of these loose ends.

    Comment

    • Omeganitros
      auauauau
      • Jun 2003
      • 8897

      #17
      HAHAHAHAHAHAH

      Comment

      • QreepyBORIS
        FFR Player
        • Feb 2003
        • 7454

        #18
        Niiiiiiiice. XD

        Signature subject to change.

        THE ZERRRRRG.

        Comment

        • psychic25
          FFR Player
          • Oct 2003
          • 367

          #19
          HAHAHA

          But @ Tny:

          Originally posted by tnyhwk900
          He does have his traits (parseltongue) and Dumbledore did mention he might have needed a last Horcrux before he killed Harry.
          From the book:

          "[Voldemort] seems to have reserved the process of making Horcruxes for particularly significant deaths. You would certainly have been that. He believed that in killing you, he was destroying the danger the prophecy had outlined. He believed he was making himself invincible. I am sure that he was intending to make his final Horcrux with your death.

          "As we know, he failed. After an interval of some years, however, he used Nagini to kill an old Muggle man, and it might then have occurred to him to turn her into his last Horcrux. She underlines the Slytherin connection, which enhances Lord Voldemort's mystique; I think he is perhaps as fond of her as he can be of anything; he certainly likes to keep her close, and he seems to have an unusual amount of control over her, even for a Parselmouth."

          "So," said Harry, "the diary's gone, the ring's gone. The cup, the locket, and the snake are still intact, and you think there might be a Horcrux that was once Ravenclaw's or Gryffindor's?"

          Comment

          • pntballa18
            FFR Player
            • Mar 2005
            • 3357

            #20
            This is probably completely wrong, but the something of Gryffindor's is Harry, right?

            Comment

            • myk0nstantine
              FFR Player
              • Jun 2005
              • 16

              #21
              Wow. Your good.

              Question.

              Okay I'm going back to the begining of the 5th book. Harry just started seeing the Therestrals, but why couldn't he see them before? He must have seen his parents die before him even if he can't remember it clearly. Also in his first year, Harry saw Professor Quirrell die. He like crumpled into rocks before Harry's eyes and when he died Voldermort's *wince* spirt thing left him. So why couldn't he see them before his 5th year?
              SomeSponge: Besides, I multitask.
              SomeSponge: Right now, I can\'t do much because the school has a firewall up.


              Always follow your stomach, because it will make you eat food and find hott guys.
              - some wise words

              Comment

              • mead1
                Cerebellumberjack
                FFR Simfile Author
                • Aug 2003
                • 3960

                #22
                This is a very excelllent post. Way to ruin the 7th book.

                Comment

                Working...