Who knew siblings could be so complicated??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #1
    FFR Player
    RainGame
    • Oct 2005
    • 1

    Who knew siblings could be so complicated??

    Here's a little riddle that ought to make you think..


    If a family has two children and the older child is a boy, there is a 50 percent chance the family will have two boys.

    So the four possibilities are: (older, younger)
    (b:g) (g:g)
    (b:b) (g:b)

    We know that the older is a boy, so that only leaves two outcomes, perfectly explaining why there is a 50% chance of having two boys.

    But say you didn't know whether the boy was older or younger, that would only eliminate the g:g possibility, leaving three others. So the odds of a b:b are 1/3.

    So how can the age of the boy determine the chance of the other child being a boy or a girl?
  • #2
    is against custom titles
    GuidoHunter
    • Oct 2003
    • 7371

    RE: Who knew siblings could be so complicated??

    When you don't know the age of the given boy, (b:g) and (g:b) are equivalent, thereby reducing the possibility pool to two: (b:b) or (mixed). One in two chance.

    --Guido


    Originally posted by Grandiagod
    Originally posted by Grandiagod
    She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
    Sentences I thought I never would have to type.

    Comment

    • #3
      FFR Player
      RainGame53
      • May 2005
      • 61

      RE: Who knew siblings could be so complicated??

      Sorry, I tried to make it as clear as possible, but (b:g) represents an older boy and (g:b) is an older girl, thus making them not equivalent.

      Comment

      • #4
        FFR Player
        Jam930
        • Apr 2004
        • 1069

        If you know one of them is a boy...

        ...well then it's obviously 50/50 because there is a 50% chance that the other is a boy.
        -Jamie

        Comment

        • #5
          Retired BOSS
          FFR Simfile Author
          Tasselfoot
          • Jul 2003
          • 25185

          Guido answered the question, you just didn't bother to read it correctly.

          It reminds me of the time I was explaining the Monty Hall problem with my father. You have 3 doors to pick from. You choose 1, 2, or 3. OK... then, they show you one of the other 2 doors, one that is empty. Then they ask you if you want to keep the door you picked or switch to the other door.

          Most people stuck with their original door, thinking it didn't matter. But, if you switch, you'll get the prize 2/3 times. Why is it not 50/50? I'll explain. I'm sure you could find this on a website explained better, but I'll do my best.

          Door 1 - 33% chance
          Door 2 - 33% chance
          Door 3 - 33% chance.

          You pick door 1. 33% chance that it has a prize. So, the combination of Doors 2&3 is a 67% chance of having the prize, or 2/3. Then, they reveal door 2 as NOT having the prize. So, you know that of the Door 2/3 grouping that has a 675 chance of having the prize, it isn't in door 2. So, door 3 has a 67% chance of having the prize and door 1 has a 33%. Therefore, its better to switch from 1 to 3 than to stay with 1.

          A bit of a tangent, but the main point is to explain that statistics lie. Statistics can be used to give whatever result you want. So, when you hear something like "80% of doctors recommend", you need to wonder about more questions... just as an example.

          "There are 3 kinds of lies. Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics," accepted to be first said by Benjamin Disraeli.
          RIP

          Comment

          • #6
            FFR Veteran
            iggymatrixcounter
            • Nov 2003
            • 1924

            Not to sound like a n00b at statistics Tassel, but if they revealed door 2 (as in your illustration) wouldn't it make it 50-50 (not 67-33) because the chances of door 1 being a prize would raise from 33% to 50%?? (making door 1: 50%, door 2: 0% obviously, and door 3: 50%) just wondering..

            EDIT: duh not even on topic but yea along with Tassel it's all about how you start your problem. You could say the odds of having 2 boys are 25% and all your other satements are true, again its' just manipulating numbers
            lastfm
            PANDORA

            Comment

            • #7
              Retired BOSS
              FFR Simfile Author
              Tasselfoot
              • Jul 2003
              • 25185

              Iggy. No, that isn't how statistics work. You chose door 1 with 33% odds, it stays 33% odds.

              From google: http://math.cofc.edu/faculty/kasman/...tml?pg=explain
              RIP

              Comment

              • #8
                FFR Veteran
                iggymatrixcounter
                • Nov 2003
                • 1924

                Ah *feels enlightened* nevermind then XD Thought I could pull a fast one.
                lastfm
                PANDORA

                Comment

                • #9
                  Banned
                  Yanah_God
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 1330

                  The gender of any previous children would not influence the fact that it's always 50/50 for XX/XY. I use the names of the chromosomes because of intergender people and hermaphrodites, since I like to avoid any possibility of argument ahead of time. Unless I want to argue.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    is against custom titles
                    GuidoHunter
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 7371

                    You COMPLETELY missed the subject of the thread, Yanah.

                    --Guido


                    Originally posted by Grandiagod
                    Originally posted by Grandiagod
                    She has an asshole, in other pics you can see a diaper taped to her dead twin's back.
                    Sentences I thought I never would have to type.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Banned
                      Yanah_God
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 1330

                      I wasn't paying attention to the subject, what was it?

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        FFR Player
                        dontcareaboutmyid
                        • May 2003
                        • 2103

                        you all fail, for you fail to take in the chaotic facts of hermaphrodites and crazy nature experiments.

                        its more along the lines of a 48.5/48.5/2.9/.1 (i think that gets you to 100)
                        Theory of Quantum Fetish Mechanics

                        Comment

                        Working...