The official Track and Field thread 06.

[dawg4321]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

yes u would kill me with a 10.5 100m. that 11.98 was an 8th grade time duh. i'm a fast runner for my grade. and emccky i wasn't trying to doubts your times as much as i was trying to get tps to see that yours are wicked fast and mine are moderate and he still doesn't believe it and he believes yours.

lol skikamukazi by the way i've only done the 55 meter once and it was indoor and i did a 7.21. you may kick my butt in the 100m or 200m but my start must beats tremendously

[Skikamukazi]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

i did a 7.21. you may kick my butt in the 100m or 200m but my start must beats tremendously

I bet that was HAM time. (Hand Automated)

My times I post are all FAT time. (Fully automated time)

[dawg4321]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

no it wasn't. it was FAT or w/e u call it. big meet i'll send ya the results if ya want. i got em.

[Chromer]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

Any of you guys on Milestat.com? It's Virginia's database for X-Country, Indoor, and Outdoor track for college and high schools. Dawg, I ran a 12.3 second 100 in 7th grade. I think I run close to a 10.6 now. I wouldn't know. I'm not a sprinter. Nor am I long distance. My fastest mile is 5:05 and that was in 10th grade. I run a consistant 2:07 800 and my fastest 400 is a 54.6. Am I good enough to get a scholarship? Probably not. However, trying to boast yourself up does nothing but makes you look like a pompous ass. My advice? Stay humble because there is someone always better than you.

[Skikamukazi]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

Any of you guys on Milestat.com? It's Virginia's database for X-Country, Indoor, and Outdoor track for college and high schools. Dawg, I ran a 12.3 second 100 in 7th grade. I think I run close to a 10.6 now. I wouldn't know. I'm not a sprinter. Nor am I long distance. My fastest mile is 5:05 and that was in 10th grade. I run a consistant 2:07 800 and my fastest 400 is a 54.6. Am I good enough to get a scholarship? Probably not. However, trying to boast yourself up does nothing but makes you look like a pompous ass. My advice? Stay humble because there is someone always better than you.

Your fairly quick, how old are you? Probably older than me, seeing as I am only 16.

And it's true, no matter how fast you are, unless you are Justin Gatlin, there is always somebody faster than you.

[dawg4321]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

i know i'm not the fastest and i said that skik was faster than me in the 100m and 200m and maybe u did run a 12.3 in 7th grade, that's good. emmcky's faster than me, that's good. all i was trying to prove to u was my times, not whether i was better than u. (except the one 55m i said i thought i was better than skik.) does one time when i say i'm faster in something make me a pompous ass?

[Tps222]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

no it wasn't. it was FAT or w/e u call it. big meet i'll send ya the results if ya want. i got em.

Good, that can be the proof. I already know Emccky and Skika are legit, I've already discussed track with them, and I've seen results.

Anyways, My school is 3-0 currently in league meets. I'm pretty happy, we won Small School State Championship last year. In New York, look up Lansingburgh.

I've also pulled a hip flexor and I expect to be out (hopefully) for only another week.

[Skikamukazi]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

Dawg, where do you live?

[dawg4321]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

i'll pm ya the results tps for the 70m dash. i don't have any 100m or 200m sadly

[Skikamukazi]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

i'll pm ya the results tps for the 70m dash. i don't have any 100m or 200m sadly

70m dash? What the hell is that? Who runs that for competition?

lol skikamukazi by the way i've only done the 55 meter once and it was indoor and i did a 7.21. you may kick my butt in the 100m or 200m but my start must beats tremendously

I'm assuming that was a running race and not a hurdle race? The time I posted was hurdles, not straight up sprinting. I would crush you in the 55m sprint. Can you even come close to a 6.2-6.4 FAT time?

[Tps222]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

Well, I guess the 11.98 could be believable. Just send me some results. When you posted the 27 for the 200, that was my main concern of bs'ing.

[staroceanfreakx]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

Meh, I suck, 4:53 is my best mile currently, but by the end of outdoor I should be in the low 4:40s. And emccky, 1:53 is really good for the 800.

[dawg4321]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

hey this thread is pretty much gone now but my times have gotten better so i'll post.

100m: 11.90
200m: 24.31 (tremdous splits for me. 12.15's each)
long jump: 17' 9 1/2"


So yeah that's my years best so far. Give me some feedback if that's good or bad or w/e for a freshman. o yeah and skik u were talking about a 6.2 or 6.4 55m dash thing. Yes that would kill mine. i did a 55m indoor dash, not hurdles.

[Skikamukazi]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

Not bad for a Freshman, I might have been a little bit faster but it's still pretty good. I'm actually slower this year than I was my Sophmore year because since then I have gained a bunch of muscle weight. I'm still fast as hell though :P

[Silver_Brian]

Re: The official Track and Field thread 06.

League finals are today but I didn't make it because I suck. This freshman who runs the mile in 4:53 broke his toe yesterday >.> For anyone who knows triple jump, there was this one guy at prelims who tripled 46 ft. We were like omgwtfbbq.