ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

[A2P]

Members will only be granted keycard privileges upon meeting the following requisites:

365 days of account longevity
Post count of 1,000+

These requisites may be waived upon request from both Vendetta21 and myself.

[Charu]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

May I ask why?

[A2P]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

Trust me on this one, Charu. I know what I'm doing.

[Celirra]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

I dont think this is needed???

Why not like
make it 50 posts or so

I don't think half of current TGB has 1000 posts


and maybe 6 months instead of a year even? I really think this is a bit extreme.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

i don't think post count matters or join date to be honest

[Celirra]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

make them submit 30 bullshit usernames to gain access

[Celirra]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

I do think this is quite silly though. If you're trying to just not let a certain someone get in, then there's better ways to do it, and frankly I don't think it should be up to one person or two people to decide that.

[A2P]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

i don't think post count matters or join date to be honest

They must, to prevent abuse of trust.
That is the Garbage law.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

They must, to prevent abuse of trust.
That is the Garbage law.

wouldnt it just be easier to revoke access and not give them access again? even if alts are made seeing someone with 0 posts requesting access to tgb is hella fishy to begin with

[A2P]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

I don't want another Attractive breaching into our circle ever again.

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

everyone knew when an alt was attractive though because they had 0 posts and were posting in tgb

[Spenner]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

I disagree about the post count, but not about the membership length per say.

Alternatively, we can just have a round table in TGB if there's a user of questionable access privilege.

[Dinglesberry]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

1000 posts, sounds gud to me

1 year isnt bad, 1000 is kinda alot, you gotta like, really not givashit and shitpost alot to reach that many

[Spenner]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

I mean yeah, for reasons like this



Dingles has been a fine cog in the bin machine, a necessary lubricant at times, and I think omitting him if this rule were put in place earlier would have stunted certain growth and complexity.

Don't judge it on post count, but feel free to judge it on a basis of how long/often they've been around. Not everyone is a spam poster, some might get 1000 in a year and be totally unwelcome for their posting style just to make it in.

[blindreper1179]

Re: ADDENDUM: seeing as TGB will never be public

Dumb and dumber