Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

[Biff_tech]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

Apples and oranges.

Give a point to why this is Apples and oranges.

[Izlude77714]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

Give a point to why this is Apples and oranges.

hmm well both games are **** just in diffrent ways and both were made for the bad kid masses to be good at so not much is diffrent halo3 had potential to be a good game and cod4 was doomed before its release

[purebloodtexan]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

this game has a bigger skill gap than both and its a damn flash game thats 1000kb big it isnt about the graphics

both games are a complete joke halo2/halo1 were better than both put together and doom is an arcade game for 800 points and that owns all of them except maybe halo1 (if your talking about skill gaps anyway)

edit: infact now that I think of it halo3 > cod4 by alot because at least on halo3 you can kill alot of people and when your guy gets shot with a 9mm in the leg he doesnt die in 2 shots like a pussy

laying in the grass behind a garbage can and shooting some guy in the ass as he walks by doesnt take skill sorry

Alright, I'll atleast try not to be one-sided.

Before you go on a illogical rampage, realize that getting hit twice (especially in the torso) are usually fatal hits. Hell, the goalkeeper for the 2002 Spanish National Soccer Team missed out on the world cup because he had dropped a bottle on his foot and severed an artery. I'm not going to say that Halo is worse for taking more time to kill other players on multiplayer, but I will say that CoD was definitely going for the realistic aspect of wounds.

On top of that, some people actually prefer going into battle with atleast a competent fire and maneuver team (CoD) in most battles as opposed to going into battle alone (Halo).

And about the trashcan crap: If they can't see you, they can't shoot you. If they can't hear you, they can't shoot you. You basically have the better edge for most of the battle, if not for the time being, with atleast one of these advantages. This is the essence of stealth fighting. Personally, I'd rather have the element of surprise on my enemies.

Also, just throwing it out there:
-Your grammar is absolutely horrible.
-There are a ton of sigs/avvies that aren't works of the respective members. They still use them.
-Personally, I haven't even seen the show, and I found Leekspin to be pretty funny. Clearly, he did, too.

[Relambrien]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

I knew it. I KNEW this would be the next big community clash!

Anyway, for me, modern > futuristic, so CoD4 all the way.

[Izlude77714]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

-Your grammar is absolutely horrible.
-There are a ton of sigs/avvies that aren't works of the respective members. They still use them.
-Personally, I haven't even seen the show, and I found Leekspin to be pretty funny. Clearly, he did, too.

to begin with I know how to play cod4 infact I rape at it but that still doesnt change the fact that the game is a joke

it saves less time so I dont give a damn no one is impressed by you using punctuation if you want to look like a hardass become a top 16 or higher player in something like this game for example

if your having an avatar pick something original like yours for example

[ShAiOnEi]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

I'm just going to come out and say it SOCOM destroys both of the two.

[Xx{Midnight}xX]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

Both games has strengths and weaknesses.

Halo 3 pros:
-Great Multiplayer
-Vast amount of weapons
-Power-ups
-Vehicles
-Shield allowing you to live longer
-Vast amount of game variants
-Customizable game variants and maps
-Customizable game settings

Cons:
-Shields gives players time to notice and escape when under attack
-Auto-Aiming
-Cheap combos (ex. noob combo [BR and PP])
-Glitches
-Repetitive
-No strategy required
-Unrealistic gameplay
-Same old gameplay as previous games


Call of Duty 4 pros:
-Realistic
-Great Graphics
-Customizable classes
-Great Multiplayer
-Great Single Player
-Good rankings
-Strategy required
-Easy to kill others
-Air raids

Cons:
-Easy to BE killed
-All weapons kills the enemy with one shot
-Need high rankings to play most game variants and weapons
-No vehicles
-Almost no use for night visions in MP
-Sniping too easy (shot anywhere and you're dead)

So IMO, Call of Duty 4 is better, but it's really close.

True in every way Halo3=Epic Fail
CoD4 = Epic Pass

[Izlude77714]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

Cons:
-Shields gives players time to notice and escape when under attack <-- this is so bad kids cant kill better players like on cod4
-Auto-Aiming <-- this isnt whats bad about h3 whats bad about h3 is the fact that every gun is a machine gun/shotgun with an aiming site that takes up your whole screen (oh wait thats cod4 so theres no aiming skill)
-Cheap combos (ex. noob combo [BR and PP]) <-- they toned it down now and no one even uses it so you really must be a ****ty player to be hit by something that pretty much only flys straight forward
-Glitches <-- they removed them where have you been?
-Repetitive <-- cod4 isnt? at least on halo you arent crouching behind a cardboard box in a ghost town for 2 minutes waiting for the other bastard thats laying in the grass behind some bricks and a barrel thats on fire to walk by so you can shoot him in the ass with your m16 and kill him in 1 hit
-No strategy required <-- same for cod4
-Unrealistic gameplay <-- on cod4 your guy runs piss slow and dies if he gets shot in the knee cap instantly and he cant jump for a ****
-Same old gameplay as previous games <-- dont put h3 on the same level as h1/h2 please because they were 15x better

I think halo3 is about as good as a pile of **** but lets look at it with some logic so imma just quote your post and add some nice arrows with my reply

cod4 is a fun game if it isnt taken seriously because you can be the best player in the world but you can die to common trash and inferior players

[MystictheHedgehog]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

O.k.
1) Grammar is not too difficult, nor does adding a punctuation mark sacrifice too much of your life.

2) We established that yes, it is very easy to be killed in CoD4(hint, More realistic) But you have yet to really say anything else except " I rape at it, this game is a joke!!!" So do tell, how is it a joke.

Halo was a great game, yes. Halo 2 had great multi-player, but overall was an alright game, not GREAT. Halo 3 is about the same as the previous, only with different graphics and weapons and blah blah blah.

CoD4 does indeed require strategy, otherwise you won't be able to get past those "kids" as you referred to them as. Not only that, but it does have more realistic game play. Humans can't jump 10 feet in the air, and the dying aspect is there because, usually your not going to live a barrage of 3 rounds of machine gun bullets. It just doesn't work like that. Normally 2-3 shots WILL kill you, a lot of times 1 shot doing the damage to kill you.

So please. Insert some logic into what you are saying, other than "EASY TO DIE KIDS KILL ME EASILY!!!"

Edit:Sorry l2awr, missed that. Thinking too far ahead of my typing.

[l2awr]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

O.k.
1) Grammar is not too difficult, nor does adding a punctuation mark sacrifice too much of your life.

2) We established that yes, it is very is to be killed in CoD4(hint, More realistic) But you have yet to really say anything else except " I rape at it, this game is a joke!!!" So do tell, how is it a joke.

Halo was a great game, yes. Halo 2 had great multi-player, but overall was an alright game, not GREAT. Halo 3 is about the same as the previous, only with different graphics and weapons and blah blah blah.

CoD4 does indeed require strategy, otherwise you won't be able to get past those "kids" as you referred to them as. Not only that, but it does have more realistic game play. Humans can't jump 10 feet in the air, and the dying aspect is there because, usually your not going to live a barrage of 3 rounds of machine gun bullets. It just doesn't work like that. Normally 2-3 shots WILL kill you, a lot of times 1 shot doing the damage to kill you.

So please. Insert some logic into what you are saying, other than "EASY TO DIE KIDS KILL ME EASILY!!!"

Hypocrite? Not to mention, your English isn't any better.

[Izlude77714]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

random stuff

I already explained whats wrong with cod4 in my post while commenting on the cons of halo3 and halo3 still takes communication and teamwork who said it doesnt? so does cod4

that still doesnt change the fact that the skill gap is still small on both cod4 and h3 so go back and read my post I said that I would add nice little arrows to his quotes explaining why he was wrong

edit: if your in any kind of decent shape you can jump better than the characters on cod4 oh and people not being able to jump? two words kadour ziani and not to mention hell loads of other people and joe eigo seems to have no trouble getting a good 5 feet in the air with a back flip

long story short you should be able to get more than 1 foot vertical when your doing a running jump even if you do have equipment on and some guns and it isnt realistic to run for 2 secends before your guy is out of breath what a damn pansy

[purebloodtexan]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

So you're saying that every single troop in every single company in every single regiment can do 10-foot jumps and backflips, especially with equipment on?

Also, the equipment that have to wear is 50+ pounds. They don't just "run for two seconds before they're out of breath," they can't do a dead-on sprint for extended periods of time. They can still do a half-sprint that's probably equivelent to Halo's running speed.

Unless you can somehow jump 10 feet in the air and sprint for half an hour with 50+ pounds of equipment, I suggest that you keep your mouth shut. Other than that, you haven't made many logical posts.

And now you're banned. Well done.

edit: I really don't mind if you disagree with one side or another, but put some reason and effort behind it.

[masamursha]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

I voted halo 3

[l2awr]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

So you're saying that every single troop in every single company in every single regiment can do 10-foot jumps and backflips, especially with equipment on?

Also, the equipment that have to wear is 50+ pounds. They don't just "run for two seconds before they're out of breath," they can't do a dead-on sprint for extended periods of time. They can still do a half-sprint that's probably equivelent to Halo's running speed.

Unless you can somehow jump 10 feet in the air and sprint for half an hour with 50+ pounds of equipment, I suggest that you keep your mouth shut. Other than that, you haven't made many logical posts.

And now you're banned. Well done.

edit: I really don't mind if you disagree with one side or another, but put some reason and effort behind it.

About the competitive depth of both games he is the ONLY one out of all of you other posters that knows what he is talking about. I'm more than sure COD4 wasn't designed to be 100% real. If you got shot would you fall down and lay there with your pistol up, ready to shoot? PROBABLY NOT. You would be on the ground grabbing your wound rolling around. I don't see that in COD4.

As for my opinion on the 2 games, I don't know the competitive world of COD4 yet, but it is much more fun than Halo 3 if your playing uncompetitive and in matchmaking. If you are playing competitively then Halo 3 is probably the more action type game because of its non realistic features. COD4 has "realistic" features meaning it is very easy to kill your opponent. So what do good/smart players do? CAMP. Ever watch competitive Rainbow 6: Vegas? They CAMP because that is the best strategy. The thing I really dislike about H3 are some of the flaws it has compared to the other 2 games, but they will hopefully be patched in the near future. Oh and the FPS on H3 sucks compared to COD4's.

[meno_rocks123]

Re: Call of Duty 4 vs Halo 3

no question.
Halo3 is a ****ty remake of halo2
CoD4 is a completely new game with way better graphics and realism than halo