I just got to ask this

[Feuergeist]

Re: RE: I just got to ask this

And yeah, I'm sure a bunch of people would rather have a PS1 than a PS2. Since the PS2 can't play PS1 games or anything.

yes they can, i've got a few ps games and i've been able to play them on my ps2

dam ur smert tech me to b smert 2?

[evilbutterfly]

Ok I see one reason you banned my lil bro: One he can't spell worth sh**
He spelled would, woild. Well anyway, one good game that is coming out is "The Legend of Zelda TP." Although, the game im waiting on is Condemned for 360. Nothing is cooler than being an NSA agent tracking down a killerin an insane asylum. On top of that, that rocks, and [Just delete all of that] not only do you get all cool-ass tracking gadgets, but you also get to kill crazy people too. Unfortunately, there is a hefty price. In order to get these cool video games, you have to fork up around 300-400 $$$$$ You have got to be kidding me! ( For the system, I mean)

You both suck, just one more than the other. :P

And if Sony really is full of thieving bastards and that one picture of the PS3 remote ever comes true, PS3 will win hands down. Oh, and PS3 has the EyeToy, which can be used for cool and innovative games, but judging by the response to that, PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO MAKE COOL AND INNOVATIVE GAMES! That's why PS3 gets all the 3rd party support, cuz they have neat peripherals (stolen or not, they have them) but they don't force game developers to use them.

And also judging by the EyeToy response, I'm guessing that most non-Nintendo games for the Revo will use the normal controller add-on for their games, and that mostly only Nintendo will make games that use the regular controller and nothing else. Other developers may imploy the tilting thing, though, which, combined with the really long trigger buttons that give you good control, will make Revo sexcellent for racing games.

I don't like racing games, though, so I'll probably get PS3. Of course, I can't really decide until they're all out and I can play them in Best Buy. :P

[suicidalmuskrat]

With the regular controller 'skin', you can still have all the functionality, including the movement in 3d space, and the tilting. The eye toy obviously hasn't really been used for actual games...Don't get me wrong, I love the eye toy, but don't compare that and Nintendo's new controller. They just aren't really comparable.

[ckj846]

Revolution will be around $200 because Nintendo is not as much of a money-whore as the other two.

Same as the Gamecube. Started at $200 when the others began at $300. Now it's $99 and $150 with many extra things included.

~Squeek

What are you talking about? Nintendo is as much of a money-whore as any other game company. You know why the PS3 going to be so expensive? Its because they are backwards compatible with all previous games. Nintendo on the other sold the Gamecube for less because it was a piece of crap with hardly any good games on it. They used it as a money maker themselves and to try and retaliate against Sony for making the Playstation after the N64.
O_o

[Kenzya]

Revolution will be around $200 because Nintendo is not as much of a money-whore as the other two.

Same as the Gamecube. Started at $200 when the others began at $300. Now it's $99 and $150 with many extra things included.

~Squeek

What are you talking about? Nintendo is as much of a money-whore as any other game company. You know why the PS3 going to be so expensive? Its because they are backwards compatible with all previous games. Nintendo on the other sold the Gamecube for less because it was a piece of crap with hardly any good games on it. They used it as a money maker themselves and to try and retaliate against Sony for making the Playstation after the N64.
O_o

You do know whether or not a system has good games is all based on opinions? I doubt Nintendo saw an opportunity to release an overpriced box. Anyway, How do you start selling a system and say THER R NO GUD GAMS LETS SEL 4 LEZ. I don't think any system started off with good games. There is always that awkward period with games after the system's release.

Nintendo also takes pride and releases many a game for their own system. Which alone would tell you that they aren't just out pushing a worthless system for money. Maybe you could say that if they sat back and let all the 3rd party developers do all the work. Hell, they're still making games for the Gameboy Advance.. even with the NintendoDS out.

You also say Nintendo made the Gamecube to retaliate against the Playstation as if there wern't other things that could have prompted the decision. TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES. They would have made another system regardless of Playstation.

Now, if you said the revolution was going to be a money whore, I could side on you with that. But only in regards to the add-ons for that controller.

[ckj846]

I didn't say that the Gamecube had no good games. I said that they didn't have very many good games. Nintendo could have pushed and made more games then they did, but they decided to come out with the DS and increase the GBA library. I might be overly biased on this topic just because I expected so much more out of my Gamecube than what I got. What I got was a system with about 10 good games that wasn't backwards compatible with anything that just sits there in a corner of my room collecting dust...
O_o