TWG III - The Backstabbing Buccaneers - End of Day 7 Victory

[aleco]

Hehe that was a joke...And you really did vote for me before. I was seeing how you would react, and I really keep my vote for Sleepless

[User6773]

Quit randomly vote-switching. I update a master text file in 2 places (individual voting sorted by voter, individual voting sorted by target) every time someone changes a vote, and you create more work for me when you switch votes twice within an hour as a joke just to be annoying. This sort of thing leads to problems on the vote count where people get counted twice, or not at all, or counted as voting for the wrong person. And this is going to be a very, very close vote. So stop.

[87x]

heh.. Everyone is changing off the Q..

By saying that he isn't fighting for his life, and giving all these reasons and with everyone protecting him.. It is indirectly saving his life.. lol.. pleading for his life would make him seem more like a wolf.. So what would he do??.. Not plead..

Im not saying he is a wolf and it would suck to lose him as a human.. but If I was a wolf and everyone jumped to get me off.. The best thing to do would not be to plead your innocence, but to make people think that you aren't pleading for your life, while indirectly doing so..

But whatever.. we will see what happens after the first night

[sleeplessdragn]

i vote for aleco because originally he voted for me and his last post makes him extremely suspicious to me.

[User6773]

RE: TWG III - The Backstabbing Buccaneers - Day 1 - LD is sl

Chardish votes for bolding the name of your vote target!

[QreepyBORIS]

RE: TWG III - The Backstabbing Buccaneers - Day 1 - LD is sl

Hypocrite. -_-

[Tasselfoot]

RE: TWG III - The Backstabbing Buccaneers - Day 1 - LD is sl

someone give me a current vote count please?

[aleco]

i vote for aleco because originally he voted for me and his last post makes him extremely suspicious to me.

I still voted for you, and my vote makes no difference at all in what the outcome will be.

[Tasselfoot]

ImEric: blah, flawof, q, zild (4)
Q: 87x, flypie, ImEric, Qreepy (4)
Zild: guido, kefit, roopert (3)
aleco: cstar, cypher, sleepless (3)
sleepless: aleco (1)
hydro: cenright (1)
tass: hydro (1)
cypher: kilga (1)


and... to make things fun... i vote aleco. 3-way tie for most votes. and, this locks it too.


ps - looks like your vote would have mattered now aleco....

[User6773]

Here Be Chardish's Friendly Guide To Bandwagon Voting™, Y'arr.
INSTA-LYNCH: requires 10 votes

The Q: 87x, ImEric, QreepyBoris, Flypie (4)
ImEric: Blahblah, The Q, Zildjian, flawofhumanity (4)
Aleco: CStarFlare, Cyphertoorima, sleeplessdragn, Tasselfoot (4)
Zildjian: GuidoHunter, Kefit, Roopert (3)
CypherToorima: Kilgamayan (1)
Hydrojakep: Cenright (1)
Tasselfoot: Hydrojakep (1)
Sleeplessdragn: Aleco (1)

Here's how it's going to work. Runoff between The Q, ImEric, and Aleco. This runoff will last 90 minutes because seriously you idiots had 36 hours to make up your minds and not throw away votes to people who weren't getting kicked off anyway and I'm moderately pissed right now that certain players who will remain nameless have been intentionally delaying this vote as long as possible, and are now continuing to do so by intentionally generating three way ties. And #2 I don't want to stay up late on account of this game and #3 I don't want to start the "night" phase during the daytime tomorrow when most of you kiddies are at school. So this is what you're stuck with. Who cares about Day 1 votes this much anyway.

(19:23:18) TasselFoot: might vote for zild, just to add some real fun to your job.

WHOOPS I DIDN'T SAY THAT (that was before aleco and zild were tied at 3)

Guido, Kefit, Roopert, Kilgamayan, Cenright, Hydrojakep, Aleco: You have 90 minutes to change your vote to either Aleco, The Q, or ImEric. Whichever of them has the most votes at the end of that time frame dies, and you should be happy I'm not rolling dice to determine this one. NO ONE ELSE MAY CHANGE THEIR VOTE FOR ANY REASON.

ALSO TASS QUIT LOCKING THE TOPIC, WHEN A PLAYER HAS CONTROL OVER TALKING WITHIN THE GAME IT IS UNFAIR.

[roopert]

I change my vote to ImEric. I feel he contributes the least and don't want to risk getting rid of someone like Q. No offense, eric

[Tasselfoot]

damn you. you have absolutely no right to change the game like this, just because you have sand in your vagina. if you didn't want this to happen, you should have followed kilga's suggestion.

YOU ARE CHANGING THE RULES OF THE GAME IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GAME. THAT IS COMPLETE BULLCRAP

do your little 3-way knife in the box. that is the way your rules state ties will be handled. any other way violates the rules, and i demand a no contest to this game if that is how you are going to be.


PS - my locking the thread after i voted CHANGED NOTHING! the rules clearly state that the voting ends after either 24 hours or the last vote is cast, whichever is later. i was the last vote. i voted, and locked the thread in accordance with THE RULES! if it was such a big deal, i easily could have waited til 35 hours and 59 minutes to cast my vote, with the exact same results... and you could have had the egotistical pleasure of locking the thread yourself.

[GuidoHunter]

ImEric12.

--Guido

http://andy.mikee385.com

[Tasselfoot]

personally... i think it would be much more entertaining if either:

a. no one changed their vote
b. kilga, cen, hydro, or aleco changed their vote to zildjian to make it a 4-way tie...

[User6773]

Let's discuss some things, shall we?

1) Immediately after voting you locked the topic even though it was not your place to do so. Now, if all votes were illegitimate after that, what would the point of locking the topic be? My only theory would be that it is to prevent the other players from discussing your vote until the next morning.

2) This sudden "change in the rules" is because you cannot hold a knife-in-box contest between three people.

3) You voted for Aleco just so you could create this little fix (a three-way tie), then you immediately locked the topic to prevent further discussion about it. Your previous comment about a four-way tie being entertaining confirms it. You cannot hold a knife-in-box contest between four people either.

4) Your entire attitude throughout this entire situation suggests that you are trying to exert an insane level of control over how this game is being played, much like how in the last game you demanded that you were treated exactly as I would treat the seer/psychic simply because you had an alliance with them.

5) Constantly bullying me into doing what you want is getting nowhere.

6) Anyone who's played TWG before will tell you that the moderator has had to make snap decisions in the interest of keeping the game fair, active, and engaging. Rather, you seem like you are trying to usurp the role of game moderator in an attempt to further your own plans, whatever they may be.

7) The day period is time for humans to make up their mind about who the most likely wolf candidate is. Alloting extra time for the humans to make up their minds instead of throwing away the vote to random chance would help the humans, don't you think?