TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Celirra
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Actually InD, I'm curious, and sorry if you explained it already;

    How do you envision me/xiz/blind as a team (as noted on your chart)? I'm kinda curious where your mind is at with that.

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    blind

    putting my vote where my mouth is for now

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    blind usually votes like this:

    Originally posted by blindreper1179
    How are you bussing your wolf team if all you're doing is trying to lynch DBP Tokzic
    after this he changes his vote to mml and then back to tokzic iirc, in ways that look organic

    however, here's a post where he's appealing to blues:

    Originally posted by blindreper1179
    ok so..... we can go with voting dbp because LIGHTKNIGHT did, but he also said he didn't think he was a wolf.

    or we can go with TILOCO who thinks xiz is a wolf.

    one confirmed blue, one uncounteredclaimed blue.

    choices.....
    which also wouldn't seem to square with his usual style, because neither of these are wagons he wanted besides xiz halfway. he seemed pretty set on wanting to resolve a tokzic/tiloco world with cel. what happened?

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by blindreper1179
    I went through Xel posts and this seems the most relevant to use.

    I feel Soundwave is a push away from partners.

    Freezing being the only town read is muy importante I think. Might be why he died?
    blind did read xel for spew here, although getting to this post reminded me of something else

    if xel has dbp as a null read, why would he care whether dbp gets lynched? why would he pop in and say he doesn't see the case for it?

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by blindreper1179
    I don't plan on going after him at all, but if he were to die today and he's wolf it helps regardless because we get another day phase for sure, because we're that much more further from mylo.
    this post is um. how do i say. waffling all over the place

    you're indifferent to the concept of an (unlikely) lynch of a claimed PR and that's so odd

    Leave a comment:


  • DarkManticoreX2
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Uh i think the only way to say this without it turning into antitown information is that it would paint tokzic and another player as confirmed t/t.

    Leave a comment:


  • Celirra
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by Celirra
    Tokzic theory: can you at least label it one as painting Tokzic as wolf or town?
    this was in response to

    Originally posted by DarkManticoreX2
    Additionally I had/still have a Tokzic theory floating around in the back of my head that I don't want to talk much about and have been operating on since mid D2.
    because I do really want to hear at least something of this

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by Xiz
    Yeah, the tokzic wagon was falling down and the xelnya wagon was building. Everyone was agreeing that xelnya was scummy enough to lynch, and nobody really defended him at all. It was that which psyched me out and made me believe that we were on the wrong wagon, but I couldn't articulate who due to the amount of time left. Cel was a person who was posting a good amount but nothing of high substance. At this time I was thinking that his kinda backseat approach to the end of the day made me suspect him and want a wagon on him, but due to it being only a few minutes left in the day I realized it was a bad idea because if people would have listened to me it would have caused a scramble, and a potential mislynch considering xel was mafia.
    sometimes scrambles are good though - it's been part of the FFR meta for a long time

    thing is, town-you shouldn't know whether xel is a mislynch or not, and i would just push for the scramble if you really believe that and think something's up with his wagon

    this reads all weird

    Leave a comment:


  • Celirra
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by inDheart
    only problem with gin and tonic right now is i wanted to cook later

    oh well

    I decided to keep drinking at a steady rate until everyone is present and interacting with one another here

    which won't happen now that tiloco is gone

    fuck

    Leave a comment:


  • Celirra
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by inDheart
    i have zero forum meta with blind outside of this game (i think that's true for many people in this game)

    based on his earlier posting and relating it to the Roundboxian Bible principle of consistency, 1821 does not fit into the same mold that his more emotional posting in early game and on this page does. i don't think he would be someone to argue against a lynch on information grounds for that reason because it seems out of the character he's established in this game.

    That's fair; I'll go back over and ponder it for a bit.
    How would you consider Blind then? I feel like you may have alluded to it prior, but if you wouldn't mind maybe... posting a case comparing how thoughts might differ depending on which of us is right on this stance, that'd be nifty.

    I guess I'm really just curious how this point you're picking up would affect your stance if at all

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    only problem with gin and tonic right now is i wanted to cook later

    oh well

    Leave a comment:


  • Celirra
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Tokzic theory: can you at least label it one as painting Tokzic as wolf or town?

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    Originally posted by Celirra
    About Blind and #1821, I don't know metas much at all really, especially not for blind, so I can't say; I'm sticking by that from what I know, because I do largely think meta reads are a bit silly anyways. I can see where you're coming from though, and it's noted if nothing else.
    i have zero forum meta with blind outside of this game (i think that's true for many people in this game)

    based on his earlier posting and relating it to the Roundboxian Bible principle of consistency, 1821 does not fit into the same mold that his more emotional posting in early game and on this page does. i don't think he would be someone to argue against a lynch on information grounds for that reason because it seems out of the character he's established in this game.

    Leave a comment:


  • DarkManticoreX2
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    About the vote flip from 1458 to 1526, I was indeed moving onto a wagon i thought would move, but I had also come around on Tokzic that phase. I wanted to pressure DBP into the thread so he didn't abandon the game like he is doing right now.

    Additionally I had/still have a Tokzic theory floating around in the back of my head that I don't want to talk much about and have been operating on since mid D2.

    Leave a comment:


  • inDheart
    replied
    Re: TWG CLXVII Game Thread How Was Awakening Reviewed

    man, i like blind's posts on this page more than other things he's done in the game though

    those read like raw thoughts rather than totally weird ones

    Leave a comment:

Working...