TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

It's way too early to be considering PoE imo but to each their own

I guess but I'm not really comfortable lynching everyone else

[Charu]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

Yeah, because storn has been really showing he's the jester.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

Yeah, because storn has been really showing he's the jester.

I'd be really surprised if storn was the jester honestly

[Charu]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

Because not only am I partners with lurker, I'm a mother jester.

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

I'm going off of the players I either have strong suspicions/concerns about or avoiding my pure nulls

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

I'm also kind of bothered by why these jester candidates would come on so strong on D0

It seems easier to intentionally fuck up and act inconsistent as time passes on

coming on strong too fast just seems too risky for somebody with that win condition

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

I guess the advantage is that down the line it will be obvious that there's a jester but still

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

I'm also kind of bothered by why these jester candidates would come on so strong on D0

It seems easier to intentionally fuck up and act inconsistent as time passes on

coming on strong too fast just seems too risky for somebody with that win condition

this is the problem with reading lurker as the jester because would a jester be so blatantly obvious that they wanted to be lynched or would the jester prefer to seem shady enough to warrant their lynch thereby fulfilling their wincon?

at first glance lurker/storn made sense for jester candidates but I'll be backing off on any jester possibilities after this post because imo there's a good chance we are all just paranoid of the idea of a jester in game where there could possibly not be one at all present in this game

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

What I am anxious to witness is how night is going to be; are we going to see multiple kills and possibly a save, or just one kill as per normal?

[Charu]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

What I am anxious to witness is how night is going to be; are we going to see multiple kills and possibly a save, or just one kill as per normal?

There's going to at least be a kill and it's going to be on you, betch.

[Charu]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

Get Foxy'd

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

There's going to at least be a kill and it's going to be on you, betch.

doubt it duder

[_Zenith_]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

Get Foxy'd

[storn42]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

[QUOTE=Charles Claythorne;4346693
storn42 - storn42, you should claim your Role because I plan on seering you next Night Phase and it would save me a seering if you just told me![/QUOTE]

im the jester.

[storn42]

Re: TWG CXXXIX (139) - Intro to Bastard++ [Game Thread]

fail