TWG CXXXIV: C9++: The Last of You GAME THREAD
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: TWG CXXXIV: C9++: The Last of You GAME THREAD
lookin good today choof
Originally posted by Moogyno one caresOriginally posted by TWG Dan Hedgehogthere are 743 matches for hedgehog suicide on deviantart
that's kind of a sad statisticComment
-
Re: TWG CXXXIV: C9++: The Last of You GAME THREAD
if you're actually serious about getting some heat built on roundbox, you should probably do the work yourself because posting shitty non-sequitors or whatever you're doing is definitely the way to put yourself in a worse lightComment
-
Re: TWG CXXXIV: C9++: The Last of You GAME THREAD
1) Realizes claim of chance to have a mason bro pair is erroneous. Differs to V in an earlier game being explicitly certain about a wolf (irrelevant information).My calculation was erroneous, I'll give you that.
you flatter me
I mean, it's not like you said you had a 93% confidence interval of Red Blaster being the final wolf in last game. Am I not allowed to give percentages based on my certainty? (this is in reference to me discussing blind, not the 50% stat I gave earlier which is blatantly wrong)
It will be no more than a shot in the dark, as we don't know if certain roles were roleblocked, unused, etc.
To restate the obvious, the only thing we know at this point is an Innocent Child and the possibility of a mason pair. That's it. I don't expect this confidence to change any time soon.
2) He is fixated on getting an early jump on potential PR reads/innuendos to figure out the setup. Would a wolf be particularly noting what the setup might be before anything happened in game?
He was also 95% sure that Blind is bluffing about being a mason bro. Why are you holding back 5% certainty that Blind is bluffing? Does this mean that you are possibly considering him actually being a mason? Would Round know even the possibility that no masons are in game and he is referring to a dead end data point just because the Innocent Child is outed?









Comment


Comment