TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vendetta21
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Originally posted by dAnceguy117
    V, would you bet your (in-game) life on a Manti lynch?
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crazyjayde
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Dude get my name right at least.

    Btw, what do you refer to when you say "what Manti said"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tps222
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    crazyjade

    what manti said.

    Leave a comment:


  • DarkManticoreX2
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    and I know I've said that like 15 times this game, but I mean it.

    Leave a comment:


  • DarkManticoreX2
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Got busy, google chrome won't load so I'm using IE (ew), need a shower. I will post tonight.

    Leave a comment:


  • mellonxcollie
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Originally posted by dAnceguy117
    if it looks like the answer is in plain sight, then it probably isn't..
    Good point, it's always best to look at everything from every angle~

    Leave a comment:


  • dAnceguy117
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    V, would you bet your (in-game) life on a Manti lynch?

    Leave a comment:


  • dAnceguy117
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    to be blunt, if manti and/or TPS are wolves and they win, they absolutely didn't earn it.

    but do I care? I just want to win. I'm not an amazing player, and I'll be the first to admit it. but there's been one constant theme when I've played TWG as a townie: if it looks like the answer is in plain sight, then it probably isn't.

    I'll do one more reread tomorrow and see what I think. townies, I suggest you do the same. wolves, please turn yourselves in thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • James May
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Originally posted by mellonxcollie
    I think it is more than just the inactivity. Both Manti and TPS are not just inactive, they are inactive while pretty much every player is accusing them of being wolves. We know that Manti has viewed the thread and made multiple fluff posts, yet he somehow doesn't have the time to make even one post with any substance? It has been days and he can't find any time at all even when his head is very clearly on the chopping block? I understand being busy IRL or not having a ton of time to devote to TWG, but this is seriously extreme.

    The same is true of TPS. I think Svaz a bit less so as she has been posting a bit, and since she is not a prime suspect it is less urgent for her to post. So if she is busy or whatever she may give TWG a bit less priority and her lack of posting isn't as suspicious. That being said, maybe putting a bit of pressure of Svaz would be a good idea to help clarify things.
    Thank you for fleshing out what I meant to say. I guess my wording sucks but I blame my iPhone or being so bloody gay.

    Leave a comment:


  • James May
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Originally posted by dAnceguy117
    disagreed. any one player can become inactive at any time. probably due to other obligations, maybe due to boredom, and I would say rarely on purpose in an attempt to win. most people sign up for a game to actually play the game.
    Disregarding those factors is what I meant. Let's assume that everyone has no obligation to attend in life and let's say that they're not bored of the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • mellonxcollie
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    I think it is more than just the inactivity. Both Manti and TPS are not just inactive, they are inactive while pretty much every player is accusing them of being wolves. We know that Manti has viewed the thread and made multiple fluff posts, yet he somehow doesn't have the time to make even one post with any substance? It has been days and he can't find any time at all even when his head is very clearly on the chopping block? I understand being busy IRL or not having a ton of time to devote to TWG, but this is seriously extreme.

    The same is true of TPS. I think Svaz a bit less so as she has been posting a bit, and since she is not a prime suspect it is less urgent for her to post. So if she is busy or whatever she may give TWG a bit less priority and her lack of posting isn't as suspicious. That being said, maybe putting a bit of pressure of Svaz would be a good idea to help clarify things.

    Leave a comment:


  • dAnceguy117
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    I'm not sure if I really hate a Manti or a TPS lynch here. gonna sleep on it. but @townies, if we lynch one of those two and he flips town, then the wolves are 1 mislynch away from a win. DO NOT just keep your list intact and move one spot down the line and lynch your next "obvious" target. DO NOT do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • dAnceguy117
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Originally posted by James May
    The thing is though inactivity can be on either sides but only on either sides, not simultaneously. You rarely see both sides being inactive.
    disagreed. any one player can become inactive at any time. probably due to other obligations, maybe due to boredom, and I would say rarely on purpose in an attempt to win. most people sign up for a game to actually play the game.

    Leave a comment:


  • James May
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    Originally posted by dAnceguy117
    James I understand what you're saying but you pretty much just named the three inactives. maybe it's right, who knows, I don't. but is it right BECAUSE they're inactive? inactivity -> wolf?
    The thing is though inactivity can be on either sides but only on either sides, not simultaneously. You rarely see both sides being inactive.

    Leave a comment:


  • dAnceguy117
    replied
    Re: TWG CI: Fiction's Birthday Party

    James I understand what you're saying but you pretty much just named the three inactives. maybe it's right, who knows, I don't. but is it right BECAUSE they're inactive? inactivity -> wolf?

    Leave a comment:

Working...