Re: FFR Users Hurt N' Heal IV
I've posted here today, but I think I'll go ahead and make a post about this little idea here...
Sorry, rzr, but I'm going to have to agree with Xception on this one. I mean, even your defense is... well...
Both posts pretty much say the same thing there. Your defense doesn't even support your idea. They will be lurking... But anyone who wants the extra Hurt/Heal will be waiting for some nice person to hurt someone down to 1. Anyone who wants the "death kill" (which sounds redundant) won't hurt someone with 2 health. So either you'll get no one posting (which is what Xception mentioned) or no one being eliminated. This all assuming no one wants to give anyone else the chance at a "death kill".
I'm also making this post to defend Ken, here... On the last page, in the post where you suggested the idea, you hurt Zageron and phe0nixblade while healing JS and s0ulston3. (Things that may have happened... 5.points posted the opposite of your extra Hurt/Heal an hour before your post, so it's not likely you were ninja'd... And if you negated a previous post or something, you would have mentioned it in that post, so...) You broke the traditional Hurt 'n' Heal rules, as Ken said. It looks like Ken thought your idea was the reason why you hurt and healed two people. That's not right, but if you split his little "attack" there, he says you did mess up the score and your idea isn't backed well (which, well, are both true, as far as I see. You may think your idea is backed well, but I don't). And though Ken may have sounded a little bitter, that doesn't mean you should be hostile in return.
I've posted here today, but I think I'll go ahead and make a post about this little idea here...
Sorry, rzr, but I'm going to have to agree with Xception on this one. I mean, even your defense is... well...
Both posts pretty much say the same thing there. Your defense doesn't even support your idea. They will be lurking... But anyone who wants the extra Hurt/Heal will be waiting for some nice person to hurt someone down to 1. Anyone who wants the "death kill" (which sounds redundant) won't hurt someone with 2 health. So either you'll get no one posting (which is what Xception mentioned) or no one being eliminated. This all assuming no one wants to give anyone else the chance at a "death kill".
I'm also making this post to defend Ken, here... On the last page, in the post where you suggested the idea, you hurt Zageron and phe0nixblade while healing JS and s0ulston3. (Things that may have happened... 5.points posted the opposite of your extra Hurt/Heal an hour before your post, so it's not likely you were ninja'd... And if you negated a previous post or something, you would have mentioned it in that post, so...) You broke the traditional Hurt 'n' Heal rules, as Ken said. It looks like Ken thought your idea was the reason why you hurt and healed two people. That's not right, but if you split his little "attack" there, he says you did mess up the score and your idea isn't backed well (which, well, are both true, as far as I see. You may think your idea is backed well, but I don't). And though Ken may have sounded a little bitter, that doesn't mean you should be hostile in return.
Comment