Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

[devonin]

Re: Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

Being a subscriber and loading the beta level reader solves this problem:
Sort by Misses, done.

[blindreper1179]

Re: Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

well, some of us can't afford the mass amount of payment ffr wants from us.

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

$38/year is "mass amount"? When you figure the low-end average user is still on FFR 5+ hours a week, that's 250 hours a year... or 15 cents per hour. And I think 5/week is a pretty damn generous number. 15 cents/hour is damn cheap, considering the enjoyment level... not to mention the benefits that come from subscribing and the knowledge that you're helping to keep the site running.

I figure that I'm on FFR anywhere from 70-100 hours a week. Then again, my FFR time is anything but average.

[devonin]

Re: Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

He's a subscriber, I suspect that his post may have been a little tongue-in-cheek

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

gonna stick my tongue in your cheek. better watch you.

[windsurfer-sp]

Re: Suggestion: un-FCed song isolation.

Cheek?