Vista 64 and FFR

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NSane
    Retired Staff
    • Jun 2008
    • 475

    #16
    Re: Vista 64 and FFR

    Originally posted by NFD
    7 is better than XP.
    Ummm..... no? I'm using Windows 7 on my laptop with 4 gigs of RAM and let me tell you, it's not THAT great with FFR. I've AAAd some VC's with it, but that was out of luck.. It is also blowing for Stepmania too, just as bad as Vista did. Overall I'd say XP kills Vista + 7 in the aspect of being able to play FFR / SM. But on the downside XP can't read more than 4 gigs of ram iirc. So? XP only needs 2 gigs of ram to run faster than a Vista computer with 10+ gigs of ram (strictly speaking of flash games, mainly FFR). I've used Vista for 2 years, Windows 7 both the Beta and the RC builds, and have used XP for at least 5 years now.

    Let me give you the chart again:

    Windows XP > Windows 7 > a rock > Windows Vista

    But hey, that's just the way I see it. Overall Windows 7 is definitely better than Vista, so when you can get 7, I'd go for it. Seeing as how what Who Cares said is pretty much true, it's hard to get XP drivers for a brand new comp, mainly why I'm spending $400+ to buy an XP laptop as opposed to downgrading my Windows 7 laptop in fear of not being able to find the drivers, and **** not working, etc.
    Retired from FFR/Stepmania
    Playing Hearthstone now

    Highest Hearthstone Rank: Legend
    Lannix#1632 @ Americas

    Comment

    • HeZe
      FFR Veteran
      • Jul 2006
      • 556

      #17
      Re: Vista 64 and FFR

      Joo computer has aquite anal fissures. fix em by using anal salve

      Originally posted by ilikexd
      Your strengths and weaknesses may never change, but they will still get better as you do, albeit disproportionately of course. You're bad at jumpstream, so just play jumpstream files. Play them for hours. Play ones you have to struggle to SDG, and play ones hard enough to make your hands and arms burn. Then play them some more. Then, the day after the next, play them again. If you aren't already doing this, you can't say you're stuck. Plateauing doesn't really exist, if you aren't improving it means you haven't put in the effort needed to improve, or your effort has been misapplied. It's more of a problem at really high levels, but never totally concrete.

      Comment

      • Tiger's Fang
        Banned
        • Sep 2009
        • 88

        #18
        Re: Vista 64 and FFR

        Originally posted by NSane
        XP can't read more than 4 gigs of ram
        WRONG, there's a 64-Bit version to Windows XP that CAN read more than 4GB of memory.

        Comment

        • NSane
          Retired Staff
          • Jun 2008
          • 475

          #19
          Re: Vista 64 and FFR

          Originally posted by Tiger's Fang
          WRONG, there's a 64-Bit version to Windows XP that CAN read more than 4GB of memory.
          Yeah, I'm aware of the 64 bit. I was referring to the regular standard Windows XP.
          Retired from FFR/Stepmania
          Playing Hearthstone now

          Highest Hearthstone Rank: Legend
          Lannix#1632 @ Americas

          Comment

          • Xandertrax
            om nom nom
            FFR Simfile Author
            • Sep 2005
            • 1495

            #20
            Re: Vista 64 and FFR

            I still have no clue why every single person in this forum complains about vista. I've never experienced any trouble with, in gaming, networking, anything.

            What type of vista is it? Home? buisness? ultimate?

            p.s. why the heck do you need 12 gigs of memory? I have 3 and my computer still runs crysis like butter.

            Comment

            • fido123
              FFR Player
              • Sep 2005
              • 4245

              #21
              Re: Vista 64 and FFR

              Originally posted by NFD
              7 is better than XP.
              7 has more features but it still uses more resources (As many, maybe a little more than Vista actually). They're both great OS's, and 7 may be better but if you're looking to minimize lag on a flash game XP would be the route to go if you're looking at a Windows OS. Not trying to offend you but please don't offer advice on this subject when it took hours of other people pulling their hair out to help you install Windows 7.

              Also did you install your NVidea graphics driver Rubix?


              EDIT: I've also had problems with flash in Windows 7...not really 7's problem as I've had this same problem in other OS's.
              Last edited by fido123; 09-3-2009, 02:26 PM.

              Comment

              • Tiger's Fang
                Banned
                • Sep 2009
                • 88

                #22
                Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                Originally posted by Xandertrax
                p.s. why the heck do you need 12 gigs of memory? I have 3 and my computer still runs crysis like butter.
                Because he's cool like that :P

                Comment

                • MrRubix
                  FFR Player
                  • Sep 2026
                  • 8340

                  #23
                  Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                  Yep, I've got all my video drivers and everything updated. My system churns through Crysis on maximum settings like tissue paper.

                  Xandertrax: It's like asking why 8 inches instead of 6. 6 will get the job done, but 8 is awesome.
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY

                  Comment

                  • Plan_Bsk81127
                    snooches
                    FFR Simfile Author
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 6420

                    #24
                    Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                    Originally posted by NSane

                    Windows XP > Windows 7 > a rock > Windows Vista
                    This made me lol. Although for me it is like

                    For me, I dont think that rock is better then vista. Vista works fine for me.

                    Comment

                    • OneHandNow
                      Banned
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 5305

                      #25
                      Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                      Originally posted by Xandertrax
                      I still have no clue why every single person in this forum complains about vista. I've never experienced any trouble with, in gaming, networking, anything.

                      What type of vista is it? Home? buisness? ultimate?

                      p.s. why the heck do you need 12 gigs of memory? I have 3 and my computer still runs crysis like butter.
                      In Korea I used PC Cafe computers which all have 4GB Ram (some 8GB) and Windows XP
                      In USA I use my computer which has 8GB RAM and 64Bit Windows Vista

                      I got some good scores in Korea over summer
                      Here I get sh!tfailFAIL scores..

                      Comment

                      • fido123
                        FFR Player
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 4245

                        #26
                        Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                        Vista actually isn't laggy at all with the right hardware but most hardware sucks balls with it. IMO torrent yourself some XP then switch to Windows 7.

                        Comment

                        • MrRubix
                          FFR Player
                          • Sep 2026
                          • 8340

                          #27
                          Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                          My hardware is hard.
                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY

                          Comment

                          • fido123
                            FFR Player
                            • Sep 2005
                            • 4245

                            #28
                            Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                            Originally posted by MrRubix
                            My hardware is hard.
                            It has more to do with it not being able to use certain pieces correctly rather than the need for more power.

                            Comment

                            • Tasselfoot
                              Retired BOSS
                              FFR Simfile Author
                              • Jul 2003
                              • 25185

                              #29
                              Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                              Bix: i told you this the other day.... you and i have nearly identical systems, right? close enough for government work, at least. i have ZERO lag with FFR on my Vista64. same way i had ZERO lag on XP. no difference.
                              RIP

                              Comment

                              • MrRubix
                                FFR Player
                                • Sep 2026
                                • 8340

                                #30
                                Re: Vista 64 and FFR

                                I have lag on both FFR and SM 3.9 -- give SM 3.9 a shot and let me know (I'd play something and everything felt at least a 16th note off). I experience a lot of lurching with FFR -- it's still playable but it's REALLY annoying to have arrows freeze momentarily and lurch every few seconds. We have slightly different systems although I don't know why I'm getting lag (no Aero helps though).

                                I've got zero lag on XP though, no lurching.
                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY

                                Comment

                                Working...