TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread - Updated 7/8/09

[Ryusei_]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Because this is a mashing score, mirit?

A FC for songs like these should be a FC...Period. If it's under 20 boos, it should count.

[Doug31]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Yes, but it's almost the exact same score as a mashing FC I got on it long ago your PA is so bad.

[Ryusei_]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

That's still stupid because obviously the reqirement isn't just a FC, it's a FC + Good PA.

I FCed it and got under 20 boos. I should get points for that.

[ledwix]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

should lump get 5 points or w/e for FC'ing EHHS, then? does his FC of that song demonstrate the same skill level as, perhaps, ieat's FC of that song? nah, so PA requirements are good to have. plus, people can claim to have "FC'd a song but it had really really bad PA" in their lvlrank.php, with no real proof of full combo.

[Ryusei_]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

should lump get 5 points or w/e for FC'ing EHHS, then? does his FC of that song demonstrate the same skill level as ieat's FC of that song? nah, so PA requirements are good to have.

Which makes absolute sense when comparing them because one is clearly mashed and one isn't....

[Doug31]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Ok, here's another thing for ya then. I just posted a BB Evo score in the FFR scores thread that had 97% of the record holder's score compared to your 95%, yet mine wasn't an FC and yours was, and you mean to tell me you deserve the FC points when my score doesn't?

[Ryusei_]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Ok, here's another thing for ya then. I just posted a BB Evo score in the FFR scores thread that had 97% of the record holder's score compared to your 95%, yet mine wasn't an FC and yours was, and you mean to tell me you deserve the FC points when my score doesn't?

Yes because mine IS an FC. You're basically saying my FC means nothing because the PA isn't all that good.

As of right now, there is no PA requirement for the FC of this song. The fact that the PA sucks doesn't make it any easier of a task to FC something like this and should still be counted.

[Sprite-]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Yes because mine IS an FC. You're basically saying my FC means nothing because the PA isn't all that good.

well technically that is true because it is a "FC" score; which means a FC. if you miss one then it is not a FC

[Nyokou]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

I FC'd Turbulence today. :3 ! Lol.

Just about.. 48 more points to go until I'm in Tier 4, though.

T_T

[Dynam0]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Sorry but this is a point-based system...FC or not, it doesn't meet the requirement...the name FC is the only fitting name for it since most FCs would have points around that score % for that song....what else can we rename it to if it doesn't necessarily mean to FC something? "minimum score req" or "average FC req"?

[DShot]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

i dont see my name up there.. haha

[arelik]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

Instead of using the FC requirement, it could be 95-98% of max score on a song. I believe that 97% with 1 miss is better than a 95% FC.

[Doug31]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

It is a certain percentage of the max score of a song, that's a lower percentage for harder songs, which all can be seen in the first post. I think the percentage way is better than just a flat FC requirement, since even if it's not an FC, you'd have to make up a LOT of PA to get the same score, and I also don't think FCs with less than a 3:1 ratio of perfects to goods like that hellbeat score should be worth much.

[uselessaccount]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

haha im still on there. funny

[hoochan]

Re: TOP Players / Tier Requirements Thread

9 more points until Tier 3