Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

When I get all the notes, I'll provide a rough "strictness" estimate.

[qqwref]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'll be glad to help out.

[Vote4Nixon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

if V4N accepted 13 and he says HE'S strict...I might have tightened up a bit too much...

Haha, I am a sucker for more interesting/creative files, something unique to offset the hundreds of "generic" FFR files, provided it's not too wtf. This batch had quite a few of them. Basically, if I sense any /expressivemanias\ or /creativemanias\, I weigh the file on a diarrhea scale to see how big of a dump it is, and then come up with a rating accordingly.

As such, I expect the other judges to disagree on a few of the files I accepted, so it'll balance out, unless I really was too lenient .

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm pretty sure that I'm going to be the one who judged a bit tougher this round.

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

ok if silvuh can't judge this time, qqwref can back up his part.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Also, if I'm reading correctly, Silvuh wants to be permanently a back-up judge. I assume whenever he's readily available, he can partake in judging. Obviously, this month is pretty hard...one reason why I didn't do it this time.

@TC: but at least you're not the only one...in fact, there's pretty much a significantly tougher judge in EACH batch section this time

[qqwref]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

jimerax: alright, I'll start working on it tomorrow morning. I have the batch.

[i love you]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

@TC: but at least you're not the only one...in fact, there's pretty much a significantly tougher judge in EACH batch section this time

Like me for example haha

++ = 1
+ = 10
+. = 2
+? = 4
? = 4
- = 4
-- = 1

Also Patashu, GTFO with that cucumber flavored beer lmfao

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

jimerax: alright, I'll start working on it tomorrow morning. I have the batch.

Thank you so much.
Send notes to me, but don't distribute it in this thread. thx

@Rebound: yeah like really rofl
@Cucumber-flavored beer: so far, almost no one understands what's going on

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I don't want you to change your rating of cucumber flavoured beer because of this, but if you're curious:

(6:25:14 PM) Patashu: ok basically
(6:25:51 PM) Patashu: first axiom: in this file there will be no jumps into or out of 16ths. except maybe a couple I don't remember exactly
(6:26:13 PM) Patashu: the synth did constant triplets. if -I- did constant triplets it would be boring so I put them only when they were tripletier and took them away whenever a jump shadowed them
(6:26:21 PM) Patashu: jumps go to the clap and to the 'cum ber' vocals
(6:26:31 PM) Patashu: there were long runs to the 'youuuu~'s
(6:26:55 PM) Patashu: if there are random seeming triplets it's only b/c they got shadowed the rest of the time
(6:27:20 PM) Patashu: so maybe itd be better if I allowed jumps into and out of triplets.

alternatively I could restep as a 'for beginners' file

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

qqwref: thx, also can you judge Toho Mathematics and The Final Hour too if possible?

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

+-9
+.-7
+?-2
?-3
--5

Maybe a bit too lenient hehu

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Just like there's one hard judge for each sector, there's also one really lenient one for each sector as well. So all in all, it might work out pretty evenly.

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Judge's strictness is always considered for team arrangement, so yeah.

Overall judges could be a bit more strict in ratings though, since +(5/5) is basically the highest rating.
(not applied for some strict judges)

Possible acceptance criteria this time.
(1) 18pts or 3+s
(2) [17pts and 2+s] or 3+s

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I use a /10 rating

1-2= -(-- is pointless and disrespectful)
3-4=?
5-6=+./+?(depending on file vs song potential)
7+=+

So some of those +'s weren't as strong as others