Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[customstuff]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

bmah and I had some ridiculous acceptance rates lol

also + (I) and +. (i) by author:


hue of those who can/can't spell it I
badass with an extra letter I
badass with a wrong letter I
*swish swish* I
classy 100% rate I
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz I
robots can't smoke weed I

a cookie to anyone who can figure that out

I'm hoping one of those is me

Edit: Maybe the classy 100% rate? File AND song...

[t-rogdor]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

screw u bro my fielz are gold

coughwhocares'opcough

[TC_Halogen]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

That accept rate is very high for both--Tass is going to cut at least half of those out, unless everyone somehow learned to step at the same time. :O

[kommisar[os]]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i feel bad for giving twice as many (-)'s than everyone now lmao

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

most of those -'s you gave probably got resubmitted and were given .+

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

My - is probably your -- and my ? is probably your -. It's comparable.

[kommisar[os]]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

probably. though i gave more ?'s since i refused to accept them lmao

dark chancellor meanies reject mi files better send to new friendly judges :flawlessplan:

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Yeah I'm gonna start rejecting more files that suck even though there's nothing wrong with them. I didn't do that at the start of this batch but it's a good way to streamline judging into a manageable process.

[kommisar[os]]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

its about being open to different styles since you're still trying to cater to a less skilled audience at the same time. i found this very hard to do (not so much for patashue)


still i would reject files if there was a lack of fun value not just accept if theres nothing wrong with it but its still a snoozefest to play.

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

yeahm I mean the latter not the former, I generally have more fun with really easy files anyway

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

if you have the right song it's really not that hard to make a super fun easy file

there's no point in accepting a file that's not fun but there's "nothing wrong with it" (if there was nothing wrong with it, chances are it would be fun too. unless you have a sucky song), because people generally won't play it if it's not fun.

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

almost all xandertrax files oops

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

bad easy file see: zelda stormy
okay easy file see: nes-style eye of the tiger

i couldn't really think of a good easy file; i'm assuming that anybody that can make a good easy file either doesn't make good easy files or doesn't try (theres probably a good easy file out there but none really come to mind)

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i liked norfolk gal

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

norfolk gals would be good if it was pr