Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[Brilliant Dynamite Neon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Theoretically the engine can handle negative stops and BPM, but if you do something like make a note that is later in the file (chart-wise) come before a note earlier in the file or overlap notes from different time-frames, it'll likely crash when trying to convert. I'd stick to stops if I were you, and even those won't show up on FFR's Cmods. Basically, no gimmicks on FFR files.

[stargroup]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I heard someone stepped over the ocean

it better be f*cking godly or I'm gonna rip the stepauthor to shreds T_T

thanks X3

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

oh fuc =x

[stargroup]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

just read the batch

based on the song choices alone, there is so much wrong with ffr you could not pay me to say it all

seriously guys get it together T__T

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I heard someone stepped over the ocean

it better be f*cking godly or I'm gonna rip the stepauthor to shreds T_T

thanks X3

i did

i guess i'll be ripped to shreds because nobody wanted to test the file and there's a few things i'm unsure on (second half of first verse, chorus layering, the little section between the ending and the final chorus)


*edit*

as with the negative stops, every few measures there is a slight random shift or delay in the song that requires a -0.010 or -0.015 stop to fix it (nothing big, not a gimmick), though i could use bpm changes (which is harder than the stop). reading bdn's post- would this be safe? either way, should i stick to just a brief bpm change?

*double edit*

looks like this

[stargroup]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i did

i guess i'll be ripped to shreds because nobody wanted to test the file and there's a few things i'm unsure on (second half of first verse, chorus layering, the little section between the ending and the final chorus)

by now you should know that I don't care for small errors, only if the file fails as a whole

if you stepped it correctly the tiny details don't matter

[customstuff]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

npv, you'd probably just have to speed up the BPM slightly in those spots instead of the negative stops.

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

by now you should know that I don't care for small errors, only if the file fails as a whole

if you stepped it correctly the tiny details don't matter

k it doesn't fail

but it's not gr9 and can't be awesome without holds (or at least really hard to do so which i'm incapable of) :<

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i could make the bpm changes for you

[omgitznpv]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i could make the bpm changes for you

i could do them myself easily, it's no big deal lol. i just wondered if i could just use the stops to save some time. though i probably wasted my own and others' by posting about it haha ~__~

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

alright then lol

i submitted a file originally for ffr to dcp2 so if it doesnt make it there i'll just save it for ffr like originally intened

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

the way stepmania handles negative bpms/stops is a specific quirk of the engine tho, unless the ffr converter had the exact same quirk it'd likely just choke and die

edit: well negative bpms more so than negative stops which is more intuitive. negative stops MIGHT work??

[who_cares973]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

i remember nsane telling me they dont :<

[revolutionomega]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

someone needs to in game starwolf xD

[dore]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm pretty sure nothing negative is coded to work in the converter.