Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[Netjet!]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

What about RATO?

I'm probably stupid for asking, but what's RATO?

[Tasselfoot]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

sprite: technically, you need permission from the copyright holder... chances are, that's a label (labels handle music rights, publishers handle lyrical rights). but it could be the composer as well, or a descendant of the composer.

regardless, pre-1923 is public domain and free for anyone to use... just that you still need the performers permission. if the performer is a piano, then that isn't a person, so you shouldn't need permission from a performer.

[dood gone krazee]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm probably stupid for asking, but what's RATO?

Reluctantly Accepting Temporary Overexhaustion. I stepped it, FGO. Play Cetaka's version from the Minitaka Pack and you'll get an idea of what it's like. My version is slightly harder though.

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Reluctantly Accepting Temporary Overexhaustion. I stepped it, FGO. Play Cetaka's version from the Minitaka Pack and you'll get an idea of what it's like. My version is slightly harder though.

hahahahahahaha

slightly harder what

you're not getting into ffr like that (I hope)

[dood gone krazee]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

hahahahahahaha

slightly harder what

you're not getting into ffr like that (I hope)

Like more technical dude. Listen to Cetaka's, he missed a few sounds. Wanna try the file?

[Patashu]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

yea okay

cetaka's is starting to weird me out I think I need a new ver anyway

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I hope you didn't step RATO with halved BPM.

[kommisar[os]]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

if anything it should be doubled


why are people making a bunch of hard songs with mashing as the only reason for replay value?

[robertsona]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I'm gonna step RATO as an easy file.

[gnr61]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

why are people making a bunch of hard songs with mashing as the only reason for replay value?

theres a lot of really hard files with replay value that require no mashing. idk how hard dood's rato is but i'm sure its doable 8)

also lol cetaka's rato is filled with errors its more of a ~go wit da flow step on 1.0x~ file than a technical one (with 240 bpm jumpstream who cares)

[buizel8888]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

DGK's rato file actually isnt all that bad. Hard as hell, but technical and alright

[dood gone krazee]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I hope you didn't step RATO with halved BPM.

Oops. That a problem? It's gonna be hard as hell restepping it at 240 ughh.

[behanjc]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

You can highlight it all and then collapse x2

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Oops. That a problem? It's gonna be hard as hell restepping it at 240 ughh.

personal preference, notes are easier to read and faster BPM gives potential for faster notes.

not a big problem in general though (yea it's hard to redo with different BPM).

[bluguerrilla]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

There weren't any bpm changes so doubling the bpm shouldn't be that hard.

And expand, not colllapse? Or is it changed in 4.0?