Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

I've received a good question from woker.

He asked if changes made to files in the old batch can still be applied for this batch, or whether it has to be held till the next batch. What do you guys think?

To reduce complications, I'm leaning towards the latter. Any files that do get accepted but still needs a change can be sent in afterwards.

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

basically latter, but if the old one is good enough for being accepted you can just resend the .sm (if it's minor changes/fixes).

[Korygon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Next batch definitely. We can always accept them then replace them with the fixed version after. Plus if there is anything else that needs to be fixed, they can fix that as well before sending their updated version.

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

ok... thanks.

I already sent the 3 files I had in the previous batch to Nsane, but only Wolf by Night has changes.

So when you close this batch, ignore the files for Csikos Post and Greensleeves because they are the same files you already have.

[Korygon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Out of curiosity's sake, how many files are in that previous batch?

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

As promised, here's the current batch which will still need to be judged first:



The exception are {A Change of Seasons}, Asteroid Run, and Humanism, because they accidentally got into the game already, but will remain there.

Here's the previous batch

107-3 already in game = 104

[Korygon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Oh **** we have SHK's permission?

Dang I have a couple more files to submit then oops

[woker-X]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

yep... there's a file already in game :P

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Haha, oh god, looking back at some of my files, they look comparatively dull or stupid today. =_=

[Korygon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Same. My 2 SHK files are so bad I cant fix them up for FFR.




I do however have 2 renard files to send. B)

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

@judges: check your PMs

[Korygon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Wait, so all 12 judges are judging the entire batch? This seems fairly inefficient

[jimerax]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Nice.

and I'll update the current queue list.

[bmah]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

Wait, so all 12 judges are judging the entire batch? This seems fairly inefficient

no

We've yet to figure out how to split the batch up. jimerax?

[Korygon]

Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread

why dont we just go by alphabet this time. group 1 judge the first 1/4 of the batch, group 2 the next 1/4th, etc etc