there may have been a man named hercules that did some heroic things, but anyone who believes he really did any of that crazy bs with the gods and stuff is crazy. in the same way, there was likely a man named jesus who did some preaching and stuff, but anyone who believes he's the son of god is crazy
but, it all boils down to what you are willing to accept as evidence. if ancient people who knew practically nothing of the world around them, believed disease was caused by demons, etc. claiming something happened is enough evidence for you to believe it, then of course you'd believe the bible. but if you have a slightly higher standard of evidence, say, one that doesn't accept the baseless claims of ancients, then of course the bible would seem silly to you.
some douchebag who tried to take credit for an assload of things he never actually did, and a bunch of crazy people glorified him in some book called the bible.
idk... sounds like a fgt to me.
All public 1-7's AAA'd.
15 8's left to AAA
Average Rank: 152
Originally posted by duddychuck@yahoo.com
God is a ******. Go away Jesus freak and read the bible --->
this is what i ment by linking to the historical jesus article on wiki which was directed at emo saur because he said jesus was fictional
my bad i guess, but i still think it makes sense to call the jesus of the bible a fictional character as long as you realize that he was probably based off a real one. like if i made a book about ghandi... but he had heat vision.
Originally posted by -zeroSKILL-
some douchebag who tried to take credit for an assload of things he never actually did, and a bunch of crazy people glorified him in some book called the bible.
some douchebag who tried to take credit for an assload of things he never actually did, and a bunch of crazy people glorified him in some book called the Flash Game Handbook.
Comment