Seeing the limits of my hand endurance

[Anuj]

Arch0wl wasn't playing the original eggman's quasar... you'd have to be crazy to think that he could get that score with indexes on THAT quasar.... its SOOOOOOOOO not index friendly... hell, i don't even think arch can AAA eggy's real quasar on 1.5x music... (gl arch, thats ur next challenge XD)

[Arch0wl]

Uh I have no plans on ever redownloading the non fixed version of quasar, so good luck with that Anuj.

[justaguy]

lol and i said you couldn't do it on aim XD

well nice job dude thats some fucking insane stamina

[zildjian133]

nuts-o the clizzown - you pwn

[87x]

1- I never knew there was a "fixed" version of this song that you made just to be index friendly... Knowing how your like 10x better than me on indexs, and I'm able to get sdm on 1.1xmusic, and probably the same on 1.2x ifI knew the song better..

2-The reason we think it looks like that is because it does... from the screen shot and the actually movie the time looks like "02", not "62"... and Unless Archs "fixed" version is longer than the original Quasar, then the Time still stands to be an issue..

*EDIT* I had a mistake in my time logic in the before post.
The original song is 2:06.. 1.5x music would make the song considerably shorter than what I originally thought of 1:54.5.. Instead It would only last for.. roughly 1:24.. That would account for 42:00.00 of playing time.. plus the 2:30 for the alotted 5 seconds between rounds.. and you get 42:30.00... still way under that 62:08.42..

3- Telling me you had "witnesses" doesn't mean anything.. Because there have been so many "accomplishments" preformed while "witnesses" were watching that have turned out to be fake, witnesses are no longer a "proof" of a task completed..


Now, You might be telling the truth, and I might be missing something on the whole time thing. If this is the case, then I am sorry.. But further evidence is needed to make me believe this amazing feat..

And Banditcom, even if archs version is still 1 arrow less per play than eggmans.. then it would 30 less by the end of the video.. and it's not.. It's 1 less.. Now since you can't have a fraction of an arrow in a song.. then It would be safe to say that he didn't play the same song 30 times in a row.. because if he would have, he would of came up with a total steps at the end that was an interval of 30 away from the original eggmans step count total..

[SgtPyroman]

I saw it myself. Chardish and ThEclipse saw it too. I know they did. Now whether anyone believes us or not, Arch0wl still did it and that should be enough. Again, I say believe what you want, but I saw it myself among other witnesses. (Good job, Arch)

[banditcom]

And Banditcom, even if archs version is still 1 arrow less per play than eggmans.. then it would 30 less by the end of the video.. and it's not.. It's 1 less.. Now since you can't have a fraction of an arrow in a song.. then It would be safe to say that he didn't play the same song 30 times in a row.. because if he would have, he would of came up with a total steps at the end that was an interval of 30 away from the original eggmans step count total..

You're confusing me with someone else it seems, because I know that fact... and I can't explain the missing arrow...

[87x]

Yes, Sorry, I meant to say Afrobean..

[Tasselfoot]

and yea... the vid says 62 minutes... i thought the 6 was a 0 before... showing like 2 hours 21 minutes x seconds, not 62 minutes, 21 seconds, x/100 seconds...

either way, i don't see how the time matches up correctly for 30 runs.... i just want to know what caused this. did you have a 30 second break in between in run?

[Kilgamayan]

When you do a Nonstop course that has song speed modifiers, the final time is calculated based on the normal lengths of the songs and not the lengths of the speed-modified songs.

I have a 10-song make-your-ears-bleed nonstop course of my own making - 10 songs from various anime (Di Gi Charat being the most prevalent) all at 1.5xmusic speed. If I remember right, completing the course gives you a total time of 31 minutes and change even though you only spend about 20 minutes playing it (timed it once).

So the 62 you see is accurate.

[Tasselfoot]

ok... i was asking because i honestly didn't know... i had no reason to doubt the run, especially with a bunch of witnesses.

[Cenright]

I have found the SM clock to be in error MANY times. So time isn't a problem to me.

I do not see how SM could just miss one arrow. I have never seen SM skip an arrow, which is much more feasible that it gaining 29. If you divide the amount of arrows by 30, it should be even.

Arch, is there any way SM glitched recording the arrow?

[Kenzya]

100 bucks says i can own that score

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

What's with the flow of these dumb noobs lately? It couldn't be multiplayer could it?

Nice job Arch. (I'll be able to join your chat tonight.. I wake up in the morning and I see the invite from eclipse.. hah, always too late)

[ThEclipse]

Nice job Arch. (I'll be able to join your chat tonight.. I wake up in the morning and I see the invite from eclipse.. hah, always too late)

K good.
Always got your away message on....



But anyways about this
He did it....there were witnesses
No cheating of any sort.

[Privateer]

That's crazy for indexes. Wouldn't be that hard for four fingers, you'd just need the time. Good job.