Lucid Bass II :: FFR Batch Submission
M0nkeyz -
Lucid Bass II -
The Flashbulb [8 / 10]
Nov/Dec 2020
Public
Released
Simfile Folder Name
Lucid Bass II (M0nkeyz)
Note Count
2073
Chart Length
2:51
Average NPS
12.5131
Estimated Difficulty
85.21
First Note
0:05
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 15
3 - 52
4 - 20
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
9 - 27.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps
1 Second
21 - 21.00 nps
2 Seconds
38 - 19.00 nps
5 Seconds
89 - 17.80 nps
10 Seconds
169 - 16.90 nps
30 Seconds
487 - 16.23 nps
1 Minute
924 - 15.40 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
0.57s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s0.53s
Posted at 6:05pm on December 28th, 2020
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2071 => 2073
AVG NPS changed: 12.50101 => 12.51308
Hand Bias changed: 5 => 3
Posted at 10:00pm on May 30th, 2021
Lucid Bass II
-------------
- Perms, sync, metadata good.
- Not sure I quite understand the cyan usage in the start. Shouldn't 3.887 and 5.486 also be cyan? Why does 19.760 deserve to be cyan, but not 14.113 or 31.054? Personally, I'd probably colour 3.887 and 5.486 and not use any cyan once the jumpstream hits.
--> Actually, if you're not colouring 3.887, you should just remove it since it goes to a hi-hat you didn't follow at 4.070.
- 6.442: Remove this or add at 7.854.
* 15.613: Add note here or remove at 14.201, 17,205, etc. Strongly suggest removing the others because they're very quiet, particularly once the jumpstream starts up again at 31.054.
- 32.642: Different instrumentation from previous [12] jump, suggest [14].
- 46.230, 115.407: Not a fan of the colour theory here. Since it slows down, knowing the quantization is fairly important from a player's perspective, and making it all green obscures that; it's much harder to infer than the other colour theory in the chart. This is a subjective note and many players may disagree that this is relevant, but it provides an added source of difficulty for people who rely on snap colours and you may not want this.
- 49.760: Suggest either moving this minijack to column 4 or making the previous [23] jumps into [24] jumps to take some focus off column 3.
- 51.171: There's a 12th triplet here, the 64th is a misrhythm.
- 53.642: Dropping the hi-hats here is reasonable, but I'd argue that following them until 54.701 would be a little more natural.
- 54.524: While the 'f' phoneme starts here, the 'fu' syllable only kicks in on the 16th at 54.609.
- 80.554, 83.377, etc.: Ghost note... I think. If this is there it's incredibly soft.
- 87.524: You followed this as a jack earlier.
- 90.524: If you're leaving this coloured, why not 90.348 as well?
- 99.348: Nothing wrong with what you've got here, but to accent the fade-out I might drop the 24ths between here and 99.524.
- 100.230-111.524: This part is really nice
- 133.760-end: Nice 35 second outro lol. (I don't mind it though)
- Overall a good and balanced chart. Minijacks and bursts are fun, jumpstream patterns are clean. I felt like some of the sounds you followed were really soft and hard to hear, particularly in the first half. I would prefer to see those removed, but I can't fault you for including them. [8/10]