35
28
21
14
7
Star Lazer :: FFR Batch Submission
jh05013 -
Star Lazer -
ETIA. [8 / 10]
Nov/Dec 2020
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273001&postcount=2
ETIA. blanket permission.
Simfile Folder Name
Star Lazer (jh05013)Note Count
811Chart Length
1:59Average NPS
6.9674Estimated Difficulty
45.68
First Note
0:02Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -13
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 5 4 - 5Jumps
x 213
Hands
x 8
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second6 - 18.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
8 - 16.00 nps 1 Second
13 - 13.00 nps 2 Seconds
23 - 11.50 nps 5 Seconds
53 - 10.60 nps 10 Seconds
89 - 8.90 nps 30 Seconds
240 - 8.00 nps 1 Minute
464 - 7.73 nps
Color Count
x 391 (48.21%)
x 266 (32.8%)
x 6 (0.74%)
x 102 (12.58%)
x 6 (0.74%)
x 14 (1.73%)
x 0 (0%)
x 26 (3.21%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 6:35am on November 30th, 2020
Folder name fixed
Posted at 10:54pm on January 30th, 2021
I reviewed my file today, and the last part looks too messy and I think an easier version is better suited for this song. Is it possible to reject a file by author's request? Thanks in advance either way.
Posted at 1:58am on March 28th, 2021
On second (third?) thought, I'll wait for the judge to decide the fate. I'll still submit a [Light] version in the future, though.
Posted at 12:04am on May 27th, 2021
Star Lazer
----------
- Perms, metadata good.
- Sync is slightly off, change offset from -0.030 to -0.036. Timestamps given under these changes.
- 2.309: The first note of the fading-in 8th melody that you follow is here, not 2.536.
- 6.627: This flam is not really ideal, suggest using a 34 trill so the patterns are separated by hand.
- 7.309: Suggest making this a 14 (or even 13 for PR) trill to emphasize the repeated 8th note in the melody--right now it just blends in with the trill and feels weird.
- 12.764-14.355: Might suggest dropping the layering to the melody here and instead just following the percussion. The chart is a little busy here (in particular I imagine the melody note at 12.991 will fly over most players' heads), and it's a significant enough change in the song to warrant such a structural shift in the chart. Perhaps something like this: https://i.imgur.com/aQ0gbAA.png
--> Note: occurs again at 27.309.
- 14.014, 28.559: Missing note.
- 57.139: This solitary 32nd is quite prominent and would not be spiky to include.
- 62.536-63.332: Nice pattern.
- 87.309: Suggest column 2.
- The chart is quite well done on a technical level, not much to remark on there. However, I do feel like there is room for improvement with the 8th melody pattern in the intro (specifically, in getting it not to conflict with the trills), and that the first two jumpstream runs were just a little bit busy in terms of layering. The later ones are fine because the melody is more pronounced.
- If you want to self-reject this chart, you still can, but as is it's an [8/10].
Posted at 12:20am on May 27th, 2021
Thanks for the feedback. Maybe I don't need to self-reject it given a higher rating than I expected, though I still want to revise the 1:27.757-1:49.120 part a bit. I'll apply the feedbacks and also try to improve that part today, and then see if it can be improved further.
Posted at 10:11am on June 3rd, 2021
Fixes applied, except that I couldn't hear anything at 14.014 or 28.559; are they some different instruments that I'm missing?
Posted at 10:13am on June 3rd, 2021
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 817 => 812
AVG NPS changed: 7.0189 => 6.97595
Hand Bias changed: -21 => -14
Posted at 10:17am on June 3rd, 2021
A small fix that I overlooked
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 812 => 811
AVG NPS changed: 6.97595 => 6.96735
Hand Bias changed: -14 => -13