Angelic Jelly :: FFR Batch Submission
Gradiant - Angelic Jelly - t+pazolite [9 / 10]
Sept/Oct 2020
PublicTokenEvents
Released
Blanket perms for t+pazolite (http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273002&postcount=3)
Wasn't quite sure if the difficulty was enough to bump it up into 100+ batch range considering how heavily FFR underrates jacks, so in here it goes

Simfile Folder Name

Angelic Jelly (Gradiant)

Note Count

1448

Chart Length

1:57

Average NPS

12.7166

Estimated Difficulty

95.48

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 6

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 90 3 - 9 4 - 176

Jumps

x 381

Hands

x 48

Quads

x 1

Color Jumps

x 11

Color Hands

x 1

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps 1 Second
25 - 25.00 nps 2 Seconds
44 - 22.00 nps 5 Seconds
105 - 21.00 nps 10 Seconds
197 - 19.70 nps 30 Seconds
512 - 17.07 nps 1 Minute
876 - 14.60 nps

Color Count

x 551 (38.05%)
x 424 (29.28%)
x 7 (0.48%)
x 324 (22.38%)
x 8 (0.55%)
x 30 (2.07%)
x 6 (0.41%)
x 5 (0.35%)
x 93 (6.42%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.2s0.9s0.9s0.6s0.3s0.3s0.3s0.3s
35
28
21
14
7

Added missing jump

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1450 => 1451
AVG NPS changed: 12.73419 => 12.74297
Hand Bias changed: 2 => 3

Angelic Jelly **9
**12.550 this burst is kinda rude even for a file like this, given the sound. You very likely have
a 3-jack on the 4 and a 2-jack on the 3 where the jack before the 4th on each is a 3-framer and 2-framer respectively, which is kinda awkward to hit
(I believe the 2-jack on 3 could even have been a 1-framer since it's 300bpm, but looking at the file data on the batch page it appears that luckily didn't happen)
It feels quite excessive to me for a sound like that.

**19.550 hmmmm...

28.440, 29 these could both be [34] jumps like you have on the 8th following, but at least (if you're trying to keep the relative volume in observation here) should share one column with the 8th imo
30.950 really enjoy the attention to detail here sharing the jump with preceding 4th
31.850 appropriate, well-timed layering change-up
45.350 not sure about this jump
**56.825 yeah these 4-jacks are quite rough. It's clear you made a special effort to isolate these hand-wise, but as it is with 3-jacks you've got a chance they end up as 225bpm minijacks straight, I haven't done the math but are these 4-jacks potentially all 225bpm jacks as well? This stuff could be a big spike Sinthasomphone-style (but larger, as the rest of the file is easier); in any case, the voice clip on the 4th is different at the end from the rest of them and I'd at least move e.g. 57.050 to a [13] if you still want to be kinda rude
61.475 missed opportunity for a minijack
69.425 ghost
74.075 on the other hand, missing
79.150 for some reason t-paz made this a 24th instead of a 16th like you have here. It may not be worth highlighting though since if you minijack this it's a potential 1-framer and the difference in 16v24 really hard to notice on 1x - up to you if you'd like to make this a 24th 2-note sequence instead of minijack
91.475 same as 61.475
105.050 this to the end is incredibly fun

This file is really fun, I enjoyed it a lot. I'm just really not sure about the burst at 12.550 and the two 4-jacks, which while may be fine for etterna/sm, on FFR ends up potentially being a shitfest. This file gets like half a bonus point for being a jack-oriented file on FFR that isn't about longjacks, but rather lots of minijacks driving the difficulty, which is rare to see in the FFR context. In that sense, I also think the file is just thematically stronger if the 4-jacks weren't there,
so the difficulty is really concentrated in minijacks and the very occasional 3-jacks, which helps to smooth out the dificulty curve some too.

After discussion with Gradiant, lifting CQ as the 4-jacks themselves are fine. I'm lifting the CQ because having decided that they are ok, the first burst isn't grounds for CQ whatsoever by itself, even though I still recommend a change, and this file is ready to go.

12.351: Changed hand on 12.651 to a jump so there's no forced minijack on (3)

**Adjusting all 4-note jack sets to 3-note ones instead. While they didn't convert entirely as 2-framers and the mix between 2 and 3 at end of the set gives bit of leeway, the 4-note sets might be a tad too long with how rigid the minijacks are in this file. Other files already in game have worse extended jacks than this but I'd prefer if this file was good. Noticing couple longer jack instances that are already 3-note sets so this will have a bit more consistency as well.

60.651: Changed hand to jump for same reason as 12.351

61.475 & 91.475: While noticeable on lower rates, at normal speed not as prominent as the vocal sounds I have my main minijacks going to. These were left out so as not to muddy up the rest of the jack usage

69.426: This is going to the hi-hats like the rest of the 16ths from 69.201 - 69.651

74.075: Added 16th to hi-hat and adjusted 16th patterning in next couple measures

79.150: Not hearing a 24th here, the song and waveform are showing the same 16ths in minijacks to me

100.251: Changed hand to jump for same reason as 12.351

Thanks for the notes!

Fixed based on notes

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1451 => 1448
AVG NPS changed: 12.74297 => 12.71663
Hand Bias changed: 3 => 6