Lost Forever :: FFR Batch Submission
T-Force -
Lost Forever -
HammyMcSquirrel [8.5 / 10]
Sept/Oct 2020
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Lost Forever (FFR Cut) (T-Force)" vs "Lost Forever (T-Force)"
Simfile Folder Name
Lost Forever (FFR Cut) (T-Force)
Note Count
436
Chart Length
2:18
Average NPS
3.2082
Estimated Difficulty
14.54
First Note
0:02
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 1
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
3 - 9.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
5 - 10.00 nps
1 Second
8 - 8.00 nps
2 Seconds
12 - 6.00 nps
5 Seconds
24 - 4.80 nps
10 Seconds
41 - 4.10 nps
30 Seconds
104 - 3.47 nps
1 Minute
204 - 3.40 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
1.53s1.53s1.47s1.17s1.17s1.17s1.17s1.17s
Posted at 7:39am on November 19th, 2020
Lost Forever (FFR Cut) **8.5
**OFFSET: where is it :( needs to be set, roughly -0.040 or so. rest of the notes uses -0.040 offset
3.794 (here and repeats) You probably already know this but PR wise the note at 4.377 is lower than
the one being repeated at 2.594-3.20 and because there's quite little else going on in this section,
stands out quite noticeably. I understand that the way you have it now creates a nice aesthetic sequence, but I wonder
if there's a way to incorporate them into something with slightly better PR. at 0.699, 1.976, 3.20 and 4.377, these should roughly be 1243 respectively imo.
21.960 PR better served by making this a 2 imo
40.928 an adorable sequence
46.540 for PR, 4->1?
74.411 ^ and nice little lilt after on the 16th
Speedup after this caught me by surprise, cute
110.941 same as previous
Cute beginner file, quite easy accept other than the missing lamb sauce (offset). I think this is a stronger file than the "[other]" version because the PR is a little
stronger, as you have more room to play with without quite as many jumps, and also the difficulty curve overall is a little more stable. Besides, it's nice to give very new players an easy file
with an actual speedup, that's quite unique imo :)
Basically accepting this (cq only on the offset lol) and rejecting the other one based on the note left here, and stepfile author's note that they prefer this version too.
Posted at 9:44pm on November 20th, 2020
Updated with fixes (namely offset and a couple arrow placements).
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 436 => 435
AVG NPS changed: 3.20824 => 3.20088
Hand Bias changed: -16 => -29
Posted at 9:48pm on November 20th, 2020
First re-upload accidentally had an important arrow deleted. Fixed that.
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 435 => 436
AVG NPS changed: 3.20088 => 3.20824
Hand Bias changed: -29 => -30