- I could not find my notes for this and it’s driving me insane because I very much remember this particular song.
- The structure clearly correlates as mentioned in the document provided explaining the scheme; however, if the section that mentions “2 notes” as “bass notes” is to be accurate, you need to add jumps at 35.798, 42.805, etc.
- 1:02.732: this jump is incorrect according to your structure, as there is no kick here. The first kick at 1:02.623 is understandably skipped so as to not make a minijack after a triple, but everything else is a hi-hat outside of the jump at 1:02.951.
- 1:03.608: if you made the two jumps for the kicks a [LR][LD] as opposed to repeating [LU], you can capture the alternating vocal samples and stay relevant because of the R-D-R-D against the vocal sample in the background, all while keeping to doubles for your stringent structure
- 1:06.236/1:06.674: according to the rules you defined earlier, this set of vocals is attached to alternating L-R, so you could keep the kicks the same jump as opposed to switching them like you do here
- 1:10.944: while I can hear the sound, it’s barely audible at full speed and might be better removed compared to all of the other 16ths for hi-hats
- 1:16.528: according to your earlier structure, this triple shouldn’t be a [234] -- you can better fix this by changing 1:15.871 to a L, then having the two jumps for kicks contain R and L respectively (again, following the vocals)
- most of the incidentals in this really just involve some subtle pattern switching and a couple of layering fixes (the 1:02.732 issue happens multiple times for example); the chart’s fine overall, albeit a bit draggy (more the song’s fault than anything)
- with a quick runthrough to ensure that you’re following the rules that you’ve set for yourself, this chart will come out just fine; catch all of the details that you listed in your scheme.txt doc properly and you’ll definitely be good to go, as the detail seems to slip away slightly as time goes on

Not too much has changed between versions, but I do notice some removed extra jumps between the two charts and structurally some notes have been moved around a bit to provide some extra relevance. I'll let this one pass now.