35
28
21
14
7
Self-Replicating Nanotech Faeries :: FFR Batch Submission
Tru -
Self-Replicating Nanotech Faeries -
BLAERG [6 / 10]
Drumhead Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
CC BY NC SA https://blaerg.bandcamp.com/album/everything-was-altered
guh
Simfile Folder Name
Self-Replicating Nanotech Faeries (Tru)Note Count
2004Chart Length
2:30Average NPS
13.568Estimated Difficulty
97.96
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x 16
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 51 3 - 77 4 - 272Jumps
x 490
Hands
x 44
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 8
Color Hands
x 5
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second11 - 33.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps 1 Second
25 - 25.00 nps 2 Seconds
46 - 23.00 nps 5 Seconds
103 - 20.60 nps 10 Seconds
195 - 19.50 nps 30 Seconds
538 - 17.93 nps 1 Minute
930 - 15.50 nps
Color Count
x 759 (37.87%)
x 607 (30.29%)
x 33 (1.65%)
x 464 (23.15%)
x 29 (1.45%)
x 87 (4.34%)
x 21 (1.05%)
x 4 (0.2%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 8:55pm on September 30th, 2025
btw i stepped this like stupidly fast compared to my typical pace especially for this difficulty level. For me that usually means it's either pretty good or pretty bad, so don't spend too much time judging this lol
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1999 => 2004
AVG NPS changed: 13.53419 => 13.56804
Hand Bias changed: 17 => 16
Posted at 7:20am on June 7th, 2026
Permission good (CC)
Sync good
Metadata good
- 31.363: missing
- 49.748-49.902: similar sound appears a few times more but only this one is stepped as 32nds
- 58.517-58.902: right hand is a bit rough. Could use something like [14][14]22[34][34] since the third one sounds stronger
- 1:01.235: sounds like 16th?
- 1:02.132: ghost?
- 1:03.286: move to 1:03.261
- 1:03.517: missing
- 1:04.056-1:05.286: a bit tricky and dense compared to what it sounds like
- 1:31.132: not sure about putting a hand here (from difficulty perspective)
** 1:40.979-1:55.748: this is overall too spiky. It tries to do too many things, and as a result becomes much denser than before, with a few spiky or awkward patterns as well:
--- 1:40.825-1:41.671: left hand feels a bit awkward
--- 1:43.440-.902 left hand, especially OHT
--- 1:50.209-.825: too dense; jump/hand layering should be toned down. Also not sure why 1:50.517-.825 is a polyrhythm, sounds like plain 32nds to me
--- 1:55.132-.491 column 1 anchor
--- What each quantization represents changes too frequently, making it hard to figure out what's going on. e.g. 1:48.363-.979 32nds; 1:54.671-1:55.748 24ths
--- My suggestion would be to prioritize more audible and discrete sounds, especially when the pattern seems to get too dense from all those sounds being stepped.
- 2:03.209, 2:03.671: missing
- 2:08.056-2:08.671: what are the 16ths for?
The first half is good, though my comment about too many things going to 24/32nds apply to some of the patterns. They weren't really spiky there so it wasn't a big issue. The second half could benefit from another iteration (and hopefully more than 1 judge?).
Judge Score: 6.00 - Rejected