Leia - Remind :: FFR Batch Submission
storn42 -
Leia - Remind -
Yuyoyuppe [7 / 10]
Autumn 2024 Seasonal Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Accepted
✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.
Simfile Folder Name
Leia - Remind (Storn42)
Note Count
2857
Chart Length
4:13
Average NPS
11.4877
Estimated Difficulty
79.28
First Note
0:04
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 234
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
14 - 28.00 nps
1 Second
24 - 24.00 nps
2 Seconds
42 - 21.00 nps
5 Seconds
96 - 19.20 nps
10 Seconds
183 - 18.30 nps
30 Seconds
448 - 14.93 nps
1 Minute
808 - 13.47 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
0.97s0.97s0.97s0.97s0.93s0.93s0.93s0.93s
Posted at 5:55am on July 7th, 2024
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2844 => 2846
AVG NPS changed: 11.43546 => 11.44351
Posted at 9:49pm on August 5th, 2025
Leia - Remind
~~
That sure is an intro lol. Very spicy compared to the rest of the chart, but I also kinda don't think there's much you can do about it. It's fairly patterned though, fine by me.
28.627: What is this 16th for?
33.916: ^
42.364: Missing 16th.
61.548: Would prefer a minitrill pattern here to distinguish & emphasize this over the (comparatively softer and less distinct) hi-hat triplets.
70.548: Prefer column 1, there's no 24th minijack here.
73.548: Strongly prefer any column except this. 3-note jack makes no musical sense here.
75.127: Suggest column 2 to relieve tension in this gap between percussion/vocal sounds.
90.284, 93.442: I find this jump pretty unintuitive. I recognize that it's for vocals, but there's no sharp attack to the sound, and the vocals do actually begin a little earlier--this is a pitch bend for a vocal that starts on the 16th at 90.205. Would personally prefer a single here, with or without the 16th included.
* 100.706-102.442: Considering what comes after, I recommend moving some weight off the left hand here. It doesn't really get a break until 110.337, and about 3/4 of that time is quite left-hand biased.
122.659-123.153 etc: bruh
136.310: I'm fine with approximating this as a 16th, but it is technically on the 24th beforehand (136.284) if you want to get sneaky.
138.758, 139.074: Really loud repeated piano note here. Same column?
209.653: This is super loud. Even though there's no vocal here, I'd use a hand for emphasis.
219.758: Please move off column 4 anchor.
* This chart is generally pretty straightforward, although I will say the 8th piano (at least, that's what I assume you're following?) in some sections, like the one starting 136.547, does often feel like it's kinda just tacked on wherever. It's often not PR'd relative to surrounding piano notes, and I can't see much rhyme or reason to where it does and doesn't form minijack collisions with the percussion layering. More intentional patterning would help make the chart pop. [7.5/10]
Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended
Posted at 10:17am on August 28th, 2025
- 1.390 First note is off, move to 1.370~
- 8.337: Bit more subjective, but I think you could get away with these being all singles
- 15.285: This feels like a ghost note.
- 15.443: Backwards PR on the piano.
- 15.916: I would make this a [13] so you can fit 16.074 on [4] since the pitch of those 2 notes is so much higher.
- 18.127: These anchors seem a bit unnecessary, even if they're short.
- 19.232: I have a hard time hearing this note.
- 20.337: Why is this a jump? Is it because of the vocals? The vocals start quite a bit earlier, so it feels a bit off. This happens a few more times in the file where you layer a jump because of the vocals, but the vocal is quite a bit off-beat.
- 21.285, 21.600: Same as 18.127, I find it kinda hard to hear what they're going to, my guess is the guitar, but it feels so muddy that I can't make out a distinct sound.
- 22.390, 29.021: Jump?
- 23.021: Surprised this isn't a hand considering the vocal + cymbal + power chord and kick. Is your hand layering just snare + vocal?
- 28.627: Ghost note, no piano and no drums.
- 33.995: Ghost note.
- 37.311: I know when you slow it down it sounds like 2 separate ''S'' sounds, but on 1.0x I don't hear a glitch or stutter warranting the 16th.
- 41.653: I would make this a [23] for PR to the vocals.
- 42.364: Missing note.
- 47.021: I would also separate these two [34] jumps for PR.
- 61.074: Since you have so many of these 16th patterns I think a way to make these toms stand out more is by making this a trill.
- 63.127: PR in this section is a bit all over the place, it's especially egregious at 66.285 where it should be more of a A C A A B C A pattern, but instead you have a staircase going down and up. It feels pretty off.
- 70.443: Surprised this isn't a jump.
- 71.390: Same here.
- 72.021: Same here, tho this one being a single somewhat makes sense since the jumped vocal is in the way (I would've personally not stepped the vocals as jumps here, but that's subjective)
- 86.811: Why jump? No kick/vocal.
- 102.442: This section is really fun, nice.
- 136.705: I wish the notes in this section would have a little bit more PR, but I don't know if you're even stepping the piano here. It seems like you are, but there's so much going on that it's hard to tell. If you are I would advice redoing the PR for this section.
- 166.863: A nice trick for emphasis you could do here is make this note a single to make that sound stand out more, obviously subjective note.
- 169.389: Why is this a jump?
- 173.179, 176.337, : Jump?
*** 179.810 - 203.653: I have a really hard time hearing what these notes are going to, the majority just feel like ghost notes to me.
- 209.337: Why is this a single as opposed to something like 211.232?
- 216.363: Missing 16th.
File is layered a little denser than I would've expected for a file like this but that's kinda your style of charting, I don't mind it that much. While playing I felt the jump use was a bit too heavy, certain jumps felt off to me because they went to the vocals and the vocals didn't exactly land on the 8th/4th. I think the file is generally well layered with a few missing notes here and theres. I think the PR is pretty bad in this file, piano section in the middle especially where the entire section just didn't feel right to me. The section with the white notes felt really off to me, I couldn't really tell what was going on it all felt like ghost notes. I also think jump use was a bit confusing at times especially towards the end where notes like 209.337 are singles while similar notes like 211.232 are jumps.
Judge Score: 6.50 - Fixes Required
Posted at 4:39pm on August 28th, 2025
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2846 => 2847
AVG NPS changed: 11.44351 => 11.44753
Hand Bias changed: 50 => 57
Posted at 4:40pm on August 28th, 2025
@Pizza
28.627: What is this 16th for?
- I swear i hear a piano note there, but if both judges think its a ghost note i'll remove it.
33.916: ^
- its a bit soft, but there is a cymbal there.
42.364: Missing 16th.
- fixed
61.548: Would prefer a minitrill pattern here to distinguish & emphasize this over the (comparatively softer and less distinct) hi-hat triplets.
- I've changed the pattern to make it a bit more distinct.
70.548: Prefer column 1, there's no 24th minijack here.
- Switched up the pattern a bit
73.548: Strongly prefer any column except this. 3-note jack makes no musical sense here.
- done
75.127: Suggest column 2 to relieve tension in this gap between percussion/vocal sounds.
- sure
90.284, 93.442: I find this jump pretty unintuitive. I recognize that it's for vocals, but there's no sharp attack to the sound, and the vocals do actually begin a little earlier--this is a pitch bend for a vocal that starts on the 16th at 90.205. Would personally prefer a single here, with or without the 16th included.
- I can understand that a little, but i feel its best to stick with what i have for now. I feel if i did it for just these notes i would have to do the same for every single vocal in the song.
* 100.706-102.442: Considering what comes after, I recommend moving some weight off the left hand here. It doesn't really get a break until 110.337, and about 3/4 of that time is quite left-hand biased.
- Yup, i've move the stream more right hand biased.
122.659-123.153 etc: bruh
- :)
136.310: I'm fine with approximating this as a 16th, but it is technically on the 24th beforehand (136.284) if you want to get sneaky.
- I can only sort of hear that slight rhythm difference, i think its best to keep its on the 16th.
138.758, 139.074: Really loud repeated piano note here. Same column?
- sure, i can work that in.
209.653: This is super loud. Even though there's no vocal here, I'd use a hand for emphasis.
219.758: Please move off column 4 anchor.
- done
@M0nkeyz
- 1.390 First note is off, move to 1.370~
+ yea the intro has like 5 different offsets. I feel like for simplicity its best to just keep it as it is as the rest of the song is just 1 constant bpm.
- 8.337: Bit more subjetive, but I think you could get away with these being all singles
+ I can understand why, but coming off the 121 212 motif of the rest of the jumps i feel it wouldn't really work.
- 15.285: This feels like a ghost note.
+ I can hear a clear piano note here.
- 15.443: Backwards PR on the piano.
+ I've tried adjusting it, I just really dont see a pattern that lets me have nice PR here
- 15.916: I would make this a [13] so you can fit 16.074 on [4] since the pitch of those 2 notes is so much higher.
+ no, but thats only cus i already did it before reading this.
- 18.127: These anchors seem a bit unnecessary, even if they're short.
+ I've adjusted the note.
- 19.232: I have a hard time hearing this note.
+ i can clearly hear a piano note there.
- 20.337: Why is this a jump? Is it because of the vocals? The vocals start quite a bit earlier, so it feels a bit off. This happens a few more times in the file where you layer a jump because of the vocals, but the vocal is quite a bit off-beat.
+ I dont find the vocal to be that offbeat that its worth moving the entire noet.
- 21.285, 21.600: Same as 18.127, I find it kinda hard to hear what they're going to, my guess is the guitar, but it feels so muddy that I can't make out a distinct sound.
+ There is a constant 8th piano playing in t he background. I can clearly hear a sound for each of these notes.
- 22.390, 29.021: Jump?
+ Its a bit tricky to fully explain why, but it feels a bit wrong to make these jumps.
- 23.021: Surprised this isn't a hand considering the vocal + cymbal + power chord and kick. Is your hand layering just snare + vocal?
+ Pretty much.
- 28.627: Ghost note, no piano and no drums.
+ I swear i hear a piano note there, but if both judges think its a ghost note i'll remove it.
- 33.995: Ghost note.
+ nope, there is a very soft cymbal here.
- 37.311: I know when you slow it down it sounds like 2 separate ''S'' sounds, but on 1.0x I don't hear a glitch or stutter warranting the 16th.
+ I Can hear it clearly enough on 1x that i think its fine.
- 41.653: I would make this a [23] for PR to the vocals.
+ that would break the entire pattern structure of the section.
- 42.364: Missing note.
+ added
- 47.021: I would also separate these two [34] jumps for PR.
+ I find it far more important to keep the kick/snare pattern scheme in tact. Its the focal point of this entire section.
- 61.074: Since you have so many of these 16th patterns I think a way to make these toms stand out more is by making this a trill.
+ I've changed the pattern a bit to make it stand out more.
- 63.127: PR in this section is a bit all over the place, it's especially egregious at 66.285 where it should be more of a A C A A B C A pattern, but instead you have a staircase going down and up. It feels pretty off.
+ I've gone over the PR here a bit, but i'm not sure i can really improve it further.
- 70.443: Surprised this isn't a jump.
- 71.390: Same here.
- 72.021: Same here, tho this one being a single somewhat makes sense since the jumped vocal is in the way (I would've personally not stepped the vocals as jumps here, but that's subjective)
+ It *is* a bit dense and a poly rhythm. i feel like making this a jump would be a bit much
- 86.811: Why jump? No kick/vocal.
+ The kick is there, But also its backed by guitar/bass/cymbal as well
- 102.442: This section is really fun, nice.
- 136.705: I wish the notes in this section would have a little bit more PR, but I don't know if you're even stepping the piano here. It seems like you are, but there's so much going on that it's hard to tell. If you are I would advice redoing the PR for this section.
+ I can understand why, but i really dont think there is much i can do with this section without redoing my scheme entirely.
- 166.863: A nice trick for emphasis you could do here is make this note a single to make that sound stand out more, obviously subjective note.
+ good idea. I think it makes sense with the rest of the section too.
- 169.389: Why is this a jump?
- 173.179, 176.337, : Jump?
+ yea, idk what was going on with this section. I've fixed it.
*** 179.810 - 203.653: I have a really hard time hearing what these notes are going to, the majority just feel like ghost notes to me.
+ everything seems fine to me. Most of the notes follow the piano which plays every 20th, with the occasional 40th. And the rest of the notes are for the vocals.
- 209.337: Why is this a single as opposed to something like 211.232?
+ Basically 211.232 has guitar backing.
- 216.363: Missing 16th.
+ fixed
Posted at 6:12pm on September 4th, 2025
I have been bullied in to adjusting the layering in the chorus
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 2847 => 2857
AVG NPS changed: 11.44753 => 11.48774
Hand Bias changed: 57 => 59
Posted at 9:55pm on October 4th, 2025
@storn assuming there was a convo about the file off-FFR here in like Discord DM's?
If not, @Pizza @M0nkeyz where FR flag sitting at on this?
Posted at 5:48pm on January 19th, 2026
Going to assume this is good to go. Pushing this.