The Radiotower :: FFR Batch Submission
Gradiant -
The Radiotower -
Yosk! [6 / 10]
OT17 Bounty Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
The Radiotower (Gradiant)
Note Count
873
Chart Length
2:20
Average NPS
6.3847
Estimated Difficulty
42.06
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 0
3 - 0
4 - 0
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
5 - 15.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
8 - 16.00 nps
1 Second
12 - 12.00 nps
2 Seconds
22 - 11.00 nps
5 Seconds
51 - 10.20 nps
10 Seconds
94 - 9.40 nps
30 Seconds
263 - 8.77 nps
1 Minute
451 - 7.52 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
2s1.03s0.67s0.67s0.67s0.67s0.63s0.53s
Posted at 8:43pm on May 3rd, 2024
Approved for low-40s bounty
Posted at 8:14am on June 9th, 2024
The Radiotower (Gradiant) [6/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good
10.750 - 22.083 - How did you decide which 16ths to include here? Feels inconsistent short of some kind of “loudest sounds” abstraction which doesn’t really explain 17.750 - 18.083. I’m also not a huge fan of some of the colour notes, some like 14.576 / 19.243 would be better off more literal as 16ths, 17.569 doesn’t seem particularly special to warrant highlighting,
Nearly the entire chart has similar issues as this section, particularly with the abstraction choices. Omitted notes often feel arbitrary leading to the chart being extremely hard to follow. It’s difficult to give much feedback on this point – I can’t quite determine your intentions at times.
A chart of this difficulty level could work here, but it would need a better focus on consistency of representation.
Judge Score: 6.00 - Rejected
Posted at 8:24am on June 18th, 2024
The Radiotower (Gradiant) [6/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
20.583: Missing note.
34.250: Missing note.
34.750-35.750: This is a prime example of the representation issues the chart has. Here, straight 16ths are used despite there being a very clear rhythm change at 35.417. It is one of the many noticeable moments where it is quite unclear as to what the chart aims to accentuate and ignore and why.
35.917: Why no white note here? Similar buzz noise as the earlier ones.
38.083-38.750: Why completely empty here??
41.750: See the 16ths at 1:56.417, inconsistent with the layering of the kick/drums.
1:22.000: Why this and not 1:22.667 for example.
1:29.583: This roll seems quite random for how subtle the sound is and how rare such long streaks of the faster 16ths are.
1:47.917: Not sure what this goes to.
Not going into too much details for the specifics like PR and missing/ghosts, as the concerns are more global and structural and the necessary changes would likely affect a decent portion of the chart.
Good effort at creating a varied low difficulty chart for such a dynamic song. Unfortunately, the general structure of it is fairly unintuitive and doesn't quite convey any clear motif for most of the chart. Playability wise it's alright, no major spike although the difficulty increase throughout the second half is not small; the rest of the song (especially outside of the 12ths) is also quite intense, so maybe this is just climax theory but it's not the most justifiable. Overall, this would require non-trivial changes to the structure to make it make sense, as right now it simply feels arbitrarily underlayered (maybe for the bounty, according to the submission description?). It has good potential for a low-mid difficulty chart of such a high intensity song (albeit a decent challenge to do so properly), but it has to be more coherent/consistent first.
Judge Score: 6.00 - Rejected
Posted at 4:18pm on June 21st, 2024
Pretty disappointing as subjective notes aside, the rest don't warrant a straight rejection but rather an allowance for fixing according to notes as there isn't enough technical errors or lack of structure to rate this low. Don't really feel like dealing with the hassle of the new appeal system though so it is what it is. Thanks for looking at it I guess.