No Cock Like Horse Cock :: FFR Batch Submission
gold stinger - No Cock Like Horse Cock - Pepper Coyote [5.75 / 10]
17th Official Tournament
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Creative Commons BY-NC-SA https://peppercoyote.bandcamp.com/track/no-cock-like-horse-cock
There is no god.

But if there is one, may they have mercy for this submission.

There needs to be a bar set for what could be acceptable as a song and this is definitely setting a bar and is either going to be complete reject or controversial at best.

Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+ Explicit NSFW 18+
- This file is likely to be explicit.

Simfile Folder Name

No Cock Like Horse Cock (gold stinger)

Note Count

815

Chart Length

2:15

Average NPS

6.1836

Estimated Difficulty

41.46

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 15

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 0 4 - 3

Jumps

x 66

Hands

x 69

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
6 - 18.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
7 - 14.00 nps 1 Second
12 - 12.00 nps 2 Seconds
21 - 10.50 nps 5 Seconds
42 - 8.40 nps 10 Seconds
77 - 7.70 nps 30 Seconds
219 - 7.30 nps 1 Minute
416 - 6.93 nps

Color Count

x 536 (65.77%)
x 14 (1.72%)
x 257 (31.53%)
x 6 (0.74%)
x 1 (0.12%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 1 (0.12%)

Largest Note Gaps

1.6s0.97s0.97s0.97s0.8s0.8s0.73s0.73s
35
28
21
14
7

No Cock Like Horse Cock (gold stinger)
>Permission good (CC BY-NC-SA)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good
>What the fuck

Doesn’t seem like you’re intending to follow the drums in this intro, so I’m assuming a pure melody/piano-y-thing focus up to 8.331
-1.384 - (subjective) missing
-3.174 - ghost
-4.437 - missing
-5.594 - missing
-5.910 - missing
-6.436 - missing
-8.120, .225 - missing

11.067 - 25.696, 30.958 - 45.903, 1:04.111 - 1:18.740 - These verse sections feel almost entirely disconnected from what the music is actually doing. It’s trying to force a swing rhythm on beats where it doesn’t exist – a lot of these 12th notes aren’t in the music. Some of them are on drum beats, but then parts like the 8th snares/24th kick details (eg. 15.119, .224 ) are ignored. Just not sure what you were aiming for here.

1:23.792 - 16th triplet doesn’t exist, syncs fine as two notes on .686 and .792

The piano fills after some hand jacks are all treated inconsistently
-~49.534 - ignored entirely
-~1:02.322 - appropriate 16th anchor (1:03.190 missing)
-~1:22.529 - 4ths only (?)
49.534 and 1:22.529 should probably be similar/the same

I actually don’t have any issue with this song going in game now that the explicit tag is functional and defaults to filtering out. We already have stuff on a similar level to this. However, the chart is overly sloppy (heh) and will need a decent amount of work (heh) before acceptance. The chorus sections are strong and enjoyable, and the layering there is very effective. But the chart falls flat in the verses.

Judge Score: 6.00 - Rejected

No Cock Like Horse Cock (gold stinger)

- Offset's fine.
- ugh

The intro really lacks the clarity. I cannot tell what you've decided to follow because it seems like the melody is prominent but landing all swings every 2/12nds even though the sounds aren't that intricate to follow through. Sync wildly varies in between this buildup.

From a judgment's perspective, there isn't that much to judge beyond the memorability of the song. The layering by itself is inconsistent across the board (this ties to the buildup on the intro, and on some swings in the verses that really do not make much sense as the vocals aren't just straight 12nds). It's just thrown haphazardly and it doesn't follow one element in the song properly so the aim on this chart is non-existent here. Despite that, I liked how you handled the chorus here, at least the sync on the vocals is a bit more spot-on here.

Beyond that, on a more subjective note - I just don't think this song will be received well for the comedic effect or humor presented to the FFR audience. Sure, explicit songs sometimes do go through, but they are mostly confined or well within the manners of unintentionally funny. This feels like a direct attempt to that (or rather designed to be vulgar-ish funny).

All in all, I'd say this chart has more pressing issues on the sync of the vocals in the verses, and a better aim would be nicer on what it tries to portray. [5.5/10]

Judge Score: 5.50 - Rejected