Approved as a mid-100 difficulty as bounty, this is cleared for judging.

Cold Heart (Pizza69)

- Offset's good.

My general gist of the chart upon initial review is that I've mentioned that this chart being on the backloaded side - around the last 45 seconds of the chart is where the overdone side is. From a charting standpoint, this isn't the most ideal way to introduce a scoring benchmark given the patterns and the way they are handled, but something has to be done here so it can alleviate some stresses of grinding this too often.

9.346 - Going to have to compromise with this being a single, sound isn't that striking enough to warrant a jump. (also for 15.289)
41.166 - Please make this a single, this is less effective to introduce a rigid jumpglut in comparison to everything else.
1:03.328 - Closed jump should play better than making this a [14].
1:17.442 - Missing a jump.
*2:01.642 and similar - This bit is where things start to deviate and with how hectic the structure of the chart is, 44th bursts (?) here seems a bit much. Your common denominations about the chart has been mostly doing sparse 32nd continuous bursts or even some polyrhythmic bits, but this starts to get the players even more frustrated about hitting these. I would advise nerfing these bits of bursts into 36ths or even more conventional 32nd bursts, but with slightly harder patterning for progression's sake.
2:13.683 - I think you might be better off not forming a minijack for these streams as it's a lot stiffer to play them right - you've done quite a bit of rigidity in the first half as is, so it's going to be better with loosening up the wrist rotation.
*2:25.491 - The off-96th former jumps are fine, but please streamline this bit maybe a little less rude. This is technically correct as-is, but oh boy this would be the most hated section after everything else in this chart thrown at you so far.

This chart works in a mechanical sense - mostly comes down to a few slight departures in your structure being on the more convoluted side as time goes on - this isn't inherently bad in any way, which it works to your forte, but I'm going to take a guess that you'll keep this chart in some capacity and maybe trying to buff the first half to make it a little bit closer to the difficulty of the second half. The only closest comparison I can think of while playing this chart is that this is more rigid than your Braindead chart, but this is different in how you approach the bursts (even more ruthless Adcar, no less). However, I don't think I have a clear, concise suggestion on making this a required fix, as you have two alternatives to go with, either:
1) making the bursts on the second half streamlined to a point that it doesn't get too convoluted or any more annoying to deal with as is, or;
2) trying with harder patterns on the first half, but at a point where it comes closer in terms of second half's density but not as reckless in comparison. This is a more difficult approach, but I think it would make sense as part of this chart's difficulty progression.

I wouldn't FR this because there isn't anything that is objectively wrong about the chart, but I do urge you to consider on this chart's approach to be a little bit more clear, as this is definitely a point of contention where this fits as one of these two bounties (committing to a lower-mid 100s, or flat mid 100s). If there's another FR'd point by the other judge, maybe you should get another look as it's more pressing. [7.5/10, Change Recommended]