Poo Yourself Jason (ositzxz369) [7.5/10]

PERMS OK
SYNC MAYBE OK? (Look around 30.212 for example. Many notes look roughly one 96th/15ms early. Really strange timing throughout that song.)

9.212: Would suggest removing the abstract 24ths here and using a fast roll into the 4th jump at 9.587.

1:03.962: Jump.

1:27.493: Shouldn't the jump be on the following 4th instead?

1:28.618: Missing note, drums.

2.21.212: Odd abstraction here. There's a clear gap between the two bursts so continuous 24ths feel weird.

2:25.712: Not sure I follow the layering here. Why this and not 2:24.399 for example?

2:34.477 & 2:34.571: Could afford 32nds here.

3:06.680: Probably better as a non-minijack.

Sure, this chart is pretty neat. Nothing outstanding but it conveys the song's intensity quite well in the different sections. Drags a little bit but it's not too bad. The layering, even when explained in the submission, isn't always super intuitive so just double check that. Aside from that, good stuff.

Judge Score: 7.50 - Change Recommended

Poo Yourself Jason (ositzxz369)
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good

9.212 - would be more consistent to not have these 24ths. Would maybe suggest only including 32nds (or maybe faster?) starting .493 -. 587 for the hihat thing
31.524 (subjective) make this a minijack? (move to 2 or make a 112 on left hand)
41.743 - minijack here feels off, debatable whether to move or delete this note, but doesn’t quite fit with the two minijacks right before here imo
1:04.993 - (subjective) If following the vocal thing it’s more accurate at 1:05.024. Would also suggest creating a minijack with 1:04.899, maybe make that a [23]
1:56.180, 2:06.680, 2:09.305, 2:11.930 (etc) - missing, melody
2:21.212 - I think 24ths are too slow/continuous for this, 32nd triplets (or faster?) might work better
3:06.680 - another debatable minijack. Like 41.473, doesn’t quite feel right to me and debatable whether to move or delete this note
3:19.243 - another debatable minijack. Like 41.473, doesn’t quite feel right to me and debatable whether to move or delete this note

S+C, no major complaints. Minor touch ups would help. A solid 🆚 experience that flows nicely.................

Judge Score: 8.00 - Accepted

Checking in on the status of this submission, as it's past the 1 month probationary period with a "Change Recommended" flag, but there's been no acknowledgment of judge notes or fixes submitted.

Files/Songs with the "Change Recommended" tag require at a minimum a response from the Stepauthor in order to continue through the submission system.

I will check back on this at a later date. If it does not receive a response or fix by then, it could risk rejection.

9.212 - I (and possibly op) think there shouldn't be -anything- after this hand except for something like 32nds (or faster) from .493 to .587. This would also make it feel more consistent with similar-ish part at 10.712. If you insist on abstracting this area, I'd go back to 24ths instead so it's not as much of a spike

3:06.680/etc. - The minijacks are a slightly unusual way to express this sound but I don't think they need to be changed. Alternatives would be to change them to a short burst or colour theory, neither of which would work well for later similar instances. I'd leave them alone.

Chart is in a fine spot overall. Good stuff