A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1563 => 1564
AVG NPS changed: 9.83638 => 9.84267
Hand Bias changed: -29 => -28

End of an Empire (Storn42) [8/10]

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

0.049: I mean, you could probably recolor those to be red and blue, they stick out for no apparent reason even if they're correct timing wise. Also it's a bit inconsistent with 13.106 which technically should also be one 96th early and 18.249 one 96th late. So either stick to regular 8ths, or be consistent with the precise sync and recolor to 8th.

55.106: Can't say I'm the biggest fan of this motif choice personally, but it's somewhat justifiable I suppose. There is just such a big difference between iterations like 11(24)33 and for example 11(34)22 because the former forces a triplet on both hands while the latter doesn't, and both types happen in the chart kinda arbitrarily (the second one at 56.477 is the latter type for example). Moreover, it is constrained to sacrifice the kicks layering because it'd be too hard, like at 55.449 with any other motif/patterning there'd probably be a jump similar to 1:28.363.

Well executed chart with intuitive abstractions. Nothing egregious to note. The minijacks motif unfortunately impacts a significant portion of the chart, but it's fine to keep it as is. Good stuff.

Judge Score: 8.00 - Accepted

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1564 => 1563
AVG NPS changed: 9.84267 => 9.83844
First Delay changed: 0:02 => 0:03
Hand Bias changed: -28 => -29

A new chart file was uploaded.

@ositz

24.420 - Why quad? No CymbalCrash
- is this another ositz mono moment? there is a crash here.

1:20.649-1:20.992/1:26.134-1:26.477/1:31.620-1:31.963/etc - Isn’t this supposed to be two 32nd triplets? Compare 1:19.277-1:19.620 and the other times you did it for 1:02.820-1:16.535
- technically yes, but the notes here just feel too quite to me to warrant the triplets.

1:48.077-1:48.592 - Why hands?
- because the sound is building up.

2:04.106/2:10.449 - Missing note
- i dont hear any sounds here that would warrant notes.

2:15.506-2:16.277 - If the jumps here are going to that drum trilling noise, then it feels like the other jumps should be 2:15.677/2:15.849/2:16.106 and the other singles should be 2:15.763/2:16.020
- the jumps are just for the accented drum notes. Looking over it again, everything is correct.

2:38.049 - Should be single
- fixed

@op

0.049: I mean, you could probably recolor those to be red and blue, they stick out for no apparent reason even if they're correct timing wise. Also it's a bit inconsistent with 13.106 which technically should also be one 96th early and 18.249 one 96th late. So either stick to regular 8ths, or be consistent with the precise sync and recolor to 8th.
- yea, i'll move these to the 8ths

55.106: Can't say I'm the biggest fan of this motif choice personally, but it's somewhat justifiable I suppose. There is just such a big difference between iterations like 11(24)33 and for example 11(34)22 because the former forces a triplet on both hands while the latter doesn't, and both types happen in the chart kinda arbitrarily (the second one at 56.477 is the latter type for example). Moreover, it is constrained to sacrifice the kicks layering because it'd be too hard, like at 55.449 with any other motif/patterning there'd probably be a jump similar to 1:28.363.
- I dont think the difference between the two minijack patterns is super important. They are both used a sufficient amount to where it shouldn't matter which one is used. Additionally The kicks were never really a big part of the layering. Look at any of the dump sections and you'll see a lack of kicks. The main thing i'm layering here is the guitar, which has a vague sense of PR determining the patterns used. In general i like the jacks because they add a bit of spice to a section that is otherwise quite dull.