Amazing!!! :: FFR Batch Submission
Tru - Amazing!!! - Carpainter & Maxo [7 / 10]
Winter 2023 Seasonal Batch
TokenEvents
Rejected
TREKKIE TRAX Label / CC BY-SA https://carpainter.bandcamp.com/album/amazing?label=3123384685&tab=music
Musician collab

Token: AAAA on any song. Potentially tack on a minimum difficulty requirement ~5. idk if that's possible. But this would be too ..amazing.. a song name to not do that for. pls.
- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.

Simfile Folder Name

Amazing!!! (Tru)

Note Count

1566

Chart Length

2:28

Average NPS

10.9741

Estimated Difficulty

76.97

First Note

0:06

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x 56

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 90 4 - 64

Jumps

x 351

Hands

x 67

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 0

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
7 - 21.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
10 - 20.00 nps 1 Second
17 - 17.00 nps 2 Seconds
31 - 15.50 nps 5 Seconds
71 - 14.20 nps 10 Seconds
139 - 13.90 nps 30 Seconds
400 - 13.33 nps 1 Minute
750 - 12.50 nps

Color Count

x 482 (30.78%)
x 395 (25.22%)
x 2 (0.13%)
x 644 (41.12%)
x 1 (0.06%)
x 42 (2.68%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

1s0.8s0.77s0.67s0.67s0.57s0.53s0.53s
35
28
21
14
7

Amazing!!! (Tru) [7/10] -FR-

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

3.535: Watch out for layering consistency in this intro. Here the "ting" isnt layered despite being relatively clear, but then 4.313 which seems to be a pretty subtle delay is layered, and then the same "ting" sound is layered in the 32nds at 4.813. Probably remove both 4.313 & 4.646 and add 3.535 & 4.424 to better represent the more audible instruments.

8.424: No reason to omit this really.

9.313: Same for this, arguable but breaks the flow without it. Not gonna note all of them since some omissions are more justifiable than others but this intro does feel like it has some slightly unintuitive gaps that dont contrast too well with the more quiet gaps like 10.535 for example.

11.035: Very subtle, especially after 10.813 which makes much more sense.

46.535: Missing note, this one is the low synth even.

46.757: Missing note.

49.924: Unclear. Same for 57.035 and similar iterations of layering that white noisy sound with a 32nd. Doesn't work well.

1:18.646: Not sure why hand here, gives weird PR with 1:18.424.

1:28.868-1:42.757: This section of the song is pretty unique and varied yet it feels quite samey with the previous section with this layering and general approach. Underwhelming.

1:50.424: Why does the kick layering go from being fully omitted to being jumps with the soft hihat added?

1:58.868: Even getting back to this main section these omissions feel so strange.

2:03.646-2:04.313 [FR]: What? These longjacks in this ending are super weird. Add the layered jumps and use shorter but better PR'd jacks.

This chart is alright. While some layering decisions are understandable given that they'd maybe have negative impacts on neighboring sections, in general the layering simply does not feel intuitive or coherent. The jacks in the last third are pretty random and not justifiable, so FR on that at the very least. Overall this absolutely has great potential to be a super fun chart, but as is it's a bit hard to enjoy the flow of the chart.

Judge Score: 7.00 - Fixes Required

Amazing!!! (Tru)

- Offset's fine.

13.979-17.090 - Interesting enough to notice that all your 4th jumps are leaning towards the right most column - not sure if that's kind of the intention but it just seems like it's not properly PR'd or anything.
33.313 - Not really hearing this hand here.
34.424 - ^
1:11.201 - Feels very insignificant for a hand here.
1:19.424 - ^

The minijacks in this chart gives quite an arbitrary feel for this to me. It's not like that they don't fit, it just doesn't give the accenting power for this chart quite the right feel for it.

**2:04.090 - This isn't exactly a 7-note jack, but a 4-note one, with this 16th being in a different pitch.
2:17.868 - Doesn't share the same pitch as 2:18.313, so this set of 4 notes should move to column 3 or somewhere else.

I'm somewhat conflicted for this chart in general - it does seem to be pretty coherent for a structure, but it isn't exactly the most intuitive. While the jacks are inoffensive for the most part, the fun factor isn't quite there for me. But at least I can appreciate the chart's consistency, so I'll FR this for that **'d jack. [7*/10, Fixes Required]

Judge Score: 7.00 - Fixes Required

Checking in on the status of this submission, as it's past the 1 month probationary period with a "Fixes Required" flag, but there's been no acknowledgment of judge notes or fixes submitted.

Files/Songs with the "Fixes Required" tag require at a minimum a fix submitted based on the above notes from judges, or a response appealing the notes involved in the reason for it being labeled as Fixes Required.

I will check back on this at a later date. If it does not receive a response or fix by then, it could risk rejection.

idk not feeling this one gang

Thanks for notes, might resub this at some point