Cheating Procedure :: FFR Batch Submission
Tru - Cheating Procedure - saminun vs Rner [6.5 / 10]
Winter 2023 Seasonal Batch
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
https://manbow.nothing.sh/event/event.cgi?action=More_def&num=238&event=142
Musician collab.
Fresh from latest BOF event that's not even out of registration phase yet.
As such this is the best possible audio quality available right now. Will update it if something better becomes available.

Title auto-translated.
saminun confirmed artist name based on this tweet/twitter handle https://twitter.com/saminun/status/1708844075741479023
- This file is a collaboration between multiple authors / stepauthors.

Simfile Folder Name

Cheating Procedure (Tru)

Note Count

1400

Chart Length

1:56

Average NPS

12.3602

Estimated Difficulty

87.69

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -4

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 13 3 - 127 4 - 28

Jumps

x 282

Hands

x 74

Quads

x 4

Color Jumps

x 2

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
22 - 22.00 nps 2 Seconds
40 - 20.00 nps 5 Seconds
90 - 18.00 nps 10 Seconds
167 - 16.70 nps 30 Seconds
450 - 15.00 nps 1 Minute
813 - 13.55 nps

Color Count

x 411 (29.36%)
x 358 (25.57%)
x 43 (3.07%)
x 503 (35.93%)
x 42 (3%)
x 27 (1.93%)
x 16 (1.14%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)

Largest Note Gaps

0.83s0.77s0.57s0.5s0.43s0.37s0.37s0.37s
35
28
21
14
7

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Artist changed: Asari vs Rner => saminun vs Rner
Offset changed: -0.761678 => -0.762
----------

A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 1393 => 1400
AVG NPS changed: 12.29841 => 12.36021
Hand Bias changed: 19 => -4

6.5/10

Permission: good
Metadata: good
Sync: read notes.

- 0.762: grab all beats and move to ~0.756 all future timestamps will have this change in mind.
- 5.912: Bit strange to see this higher pitch sequence on [1].
- 12.850: PR here is backwards in alot of ways, making the [2][3][2] a [3][2][3] would make it alot more accurate PR wise.
- 13.225 - 13.506: Same here, PR is mostly descending instead of the ascending motion you have.
- 16.693, 16.975, 18.193 etc.: Missing notes?
- 18.662, 20.162, 22.975 etc.: Strange to have this as a jack or even a note at all considering you omit 17.162.

***I also find these jacks really hard to justify and they're my main gripe with the chart, I don't hear enough intensity or repetition here.

- 23.068: Lower pitch than 22.787.
- 28.178: Missing note.
- 28.506, 29.678 etc.: Missing note.
- 28.646, 30.146 etc.: Ghost note.
- 32.537, 32.725: What are these jumps going to? The chords are on the 8th and omitted 4th.
- 34.131: Why are these jumps as opposed to 35.350?
- 35.131: Why 24ths?
- 36.100: I understand the next 16th jacking, but why does this connect to the 8th jump?
- 36.943: The sequence starting here seems so tame compared to 36.193 for no apparent reason.
- 40.412: Higher pitch than 40.131.
- 41.256: Higher pitch than 40.412.
- 42.475: Lower pitch than 41.912.

***PR on these jumps isn't very accurate, not gonna point them all out, but it's a consistent problem.

- 51.193: Why these jacks when you don't highlight this sound at 45.193?
- 52.318: Why jack?
- 54.193: Backwards PR.
- 54.381: Alot of these gluts seem arbitrary and unjustified.

***I feel these gluts are spiky, if the sound was super loud or noteworthy I could see why they'd be there, but they seem put in for the sake of making the chart more difficult.

- 55.131: Jump?
- 58.787: Ghost note?
- 64.225: This should be on [1] for PR.
- 65.725: on [2].
- 67.225: on [4]. (etc.)
- 69.943: These gluts are fine in my opinion
- 79.037: Missing note.
- 82.693: I think this note is worth including.
- 85.318: Jump?
- 90.240: I feel this 32nd is more prominent than 90.146.
- 90.756: Backwards PR
- 95.490: I'd include this note instead of the 16th at 95.537.
- 104.021: Why this 32nd here all of a sudden, the melody is doing 48ths.

This chart has sections that are absolutely fantastic, amazingly fun. But there are so many unjustified jacks and gluts that do not go with the pitch or the intensity of the music that make the chart so much less enjoyable for me. The chart has pitch issues and I've pointed them out in my notes, but they're not what's subtracting from the fun for me, you're highlighting the right things with jumps and you're omitting notes consistently for the most part, but the jacks and gluts are just too abrasive.

Cheating Procedure (Tru) [6.5/10]

PERMS OK
SYNC OK

15.855: Missing note, there's both a drum note and a bass note.

15.762-27.762: Layering not super intuitive here. Whatever instrument is followed, there seems to be one or more missing notes.

22.980 & 24.668: What are these minijacks going to?

28.183: Missing note.

28.652: Ghost note, probably meant to go at 28.746. Same issue for 30.152.

30.980: This flam comes before the 8th, not after. Same for 32.293.

33.902: What are the 32nds going to? If it's the low freq/volume drums, then this note is fine but 33.996 is a ghost note.

35.137: No 24ths here.

39.387: There are 24ths drums here to the 8th.

40.699: Why is this a single but 41.074 a jump?

41.543: Ghost note.

47.496: Shouldn't this be another of those 48ths flams?

47.543: Ghost note. See 52.043 for example.

50.293: Ghost note.

55.137: Jump?

56.699: Why 24th suddenly? This is another 48th at 56.668.

58.043: Ghost note.

58.793: Ghost note, what is layered there?

1:06.480: Just an example of bit strange PR with the following (23).

1:22.137-1:22.887: The piano here seems wrong. It should be in 12ths/24ths at 1:22.262, 1:22.387, 1:22.574 and 1:22.762. Some 16ths should probably be removed too.

1:25.105: Ghost note.

1:26.262: Triplet 32nds here, not 24ths. Same for 1:26.824.

1:28.699: Same mistake as 28.652, but more apparent. 1:30.246 too.

1:31.699: 32nds triplets here too.

1:32.918: Why jump?

1:33.980: Should also go before the 8th.

1:35.137: Here it's a 32nds triplet but it starts on the 16th, not the 8th.

Quite torn on this one. The ideas are cool, and the difficulty progression is neat, but there are just so many execution errors and parts of unclear/inconsistent layering that it really brings the chart down a fair bit. Given that there are also some layering concerns here and there plus the rest, this would be a non-trivial amount of fixes. This can become a cool chart though.