Annihilation in F# Minor :: FFR Batch Submission

XelNya - Annihilation in F# Minor - tn-shi [5 / 10]

Round-Table Special Batch

Public

Rejected

https://i.imgur.com/AA8rC0c.png

Permission note: Also can verify the screenshot is from here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNELszYKqU8 - would be happy to send a formal request, but can't really be bothered since it's right there, and I don't currently plan to chart anymore tn-shi myself for FFR.

A lot of the 192nds are either a layering compromise, or indicative of notes that would be holds to give it flair, without having to layer them super roughly. You can see this by comparison to the copy in the Etterna Shattered Paradise pack.

Simfile Folder Name

Annihilation in F# Minor (XelNya)

Note Count

2421

Chart Length

2:42

Average NPS

15.1787

Estimated Difficulty

98.41

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -33

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 20 3 - 86 4 - 729

Jumps

								x 556
							

Hands

								x 44
							

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

								x 10
							

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
10 - 30.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
16 - 32.00 nps 1 Second
30 - 30.00 nps 2 Seconds
50 - 25.00 nps 5 Seconds
111 - 22.20 nps 10 Seconds
213 - 21.30 nps 30 Seconds
623 - 20.77 nps 1 Minute
1176 - 19.60 nps

Color Count

x 781 (32.26%)

x 534 (22.06%)

x 191 (7.89%)

x 392 (16.19%)

x 123 (5.08%)

x 10 (0.41%)

x 0 (0%)

x 7 (0.29%)

x 383 (15.82%)

Largest Note Gaps

2.13s2.13s1.37s1.1s1.1s1.1s1.07s1.07s

REJECTED

My issues with this file come down to three major points:
- First off, FFR has enough trill giga-spikes. That ending trill does not need to be as hard as it is.
- Anchor usage throughout is sloppy and often creates unnecessarily difficult patterns, without really accenting anything in particular. For some examples, see 22.092-22.759 column 3, 27.692-28.492 column 3, 81.336 left hand in general, 84.003 column 4, 105.759 right hand in general but especially column 3. This list is not comprehensive. There are more, and there are worse ones. This is to give you a primer on what to look for.
- In colour theory sections, the same colour is used for multiple different purposes within the same section, which makes things confusing and defeats the point of using colour theory as a way to highlight a specific element of the song.
These issues would take significant work throughout the whole file, which is too much for an FR.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

Reject

I want to like this chart. It has some decent ideas but falls a little flat on execution.

Colour use at 31.558 - ~1:03.558 obscures more than it enhances playing this chart. That's mostly a case of combining 20ths and using white notes for all the other colour work. Really need either another colour or change the non-20ths white notes back to standard colours.
Colour use in the second half of the chart works fairly well imo. For consistency you'd probably want to edit the colour work here too to whichever non-white note you choose.

In the js portions there's some needed work to avoid some rather yikes-y OHT sections, most notable is the left hand at 1:57.092 - ~2:03.292

Agree with pizza on the trills, especially the one near the end.

I kind of realize now after actually reading Pizza's review that we're basically saying the same things. I could see this getting in with some work.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

2 Reject
Moved to reject.

Thanks for your submission!~

Tools: Convert Timestamp

I think the comments from pizza suck, but thanks for giving it a look. Best of luck to you guys.

Tools: Convert Timestamp

If you have constructive feedback on my review, please feel free to give it. Otherwise such comments are a bit pointless.

Tools: Convert Timestamp