35
28
21
14
7
New York Back Raise :: FFR Batch Submission
TheTrueXfish -
New York Back Raise -
saaa, kei_iwata, stuv & wakadori [6.25 / 10]
16th Official Tournament (see thread)
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
The song was released under BMS of Fighters - https://manbow.nothing.sh/event/event.cgi?action=More_def&num=1&event=140
My first file that I've ever submitted for FFR. Personally, I'm happy about the end result, and I hope it could be accepted, even if there might exist a bit of a spike. I nerfed it a decent bit already, so it's more balanced. Featuring a good variation of patterns and rhythms, I proudly submit this file. Or something like that haha.
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "New York Back Raise (Fisu)" vs "New York Back Raise (TheTrueXfish)"
Simfile Folder Name
New York Back Raise (Fisu)Note Count
1583Chart Length
2:32Average NPS
10.8375Estimated Difficulty
84.13
First Note
0:05Ending Note Delay
0:04Hand Bias
x -23
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 3 3 - 72 4 - 108Jumps
x 346
Hands
x 80
Quads
x 1
Color Jumps
x 0
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second11 - 33.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
24 - 24.00 nps 2 Seconds
42 - 21.00 nps 5 Seconds
95 - 19.00 nps 10 Seconds
173 - 17.30 nps 30 Seconds
445 - 14.83 nps 1 Minute
707 - 11.78 nps
Color Count
x 613 (38.72%)
x 283 (17.88%)
x 235 (14.85%)
x 384 (24.26%)
x 24 (1.52%)
x 44 (2.78%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
x 0 (0%)
Posted at 9:38pm on October 7th, 2023
New York Back Raise (Fisu) [6.5/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
4.543/7.543 - Should be jump
9.043-13.168 - What are you even stepping here?
20.855 - Missing jump
23.668-23.855 - It’s 24ths here, not 32nds
35.855 - Why jump?
36.043-36.136/36.605-36.699 - Why minijack?
37.730 - Should move to [1] for better PR
43.636 - Should move to [3] for better PR
48.699/48.886 - Missing note
52.543/54.043/55.543 - Maybe remove these singles for this section so it doesn’t blur with the incoming percussion at 57.043
58.636/1:01.918/1:02.386 - Missing note
1:02.855-1:03.043 - It’s 32nds here, not 24ths
1:09.668/1:11.168 - Should be jump
1:15.792 - Missing note
1:16.417 - Should be jump
1:18.229 - Ghost note
1:18.354/1:18.479 - Missing note
1:18.917/1:19.042 - Should be jump
1:25.417-1:25.667 - Fix hand PR. Compare the different noises of the neighboring hands
1:27.667 - Should be jump
1:30.145/1:31.204/1:32.498/1:33.892 - Fix hand PR
1:36.421-1:36.671 - No need to be fancy here, all this section needed was just a hand on 1:36.421 and on 1:36.657
1:37.647/1:38.705/1:39.999/1:41.391/1:42.449 - Fix hand PR
1:47.901/1:47.994 - Missing note
1:48.276/1:48.651 - Ghost note. Piano is what’s being focused right now
1:49.119 - Should be [4] for better PR
1:51.651/1:52.026/1:52.213/1:52.963 - Ghost note. Piano is the focus
1:53.713/1:53.994 - Missing note
1:54.463/1:54.651/1:54.744/1:55.026/1:57.276/2:01.494/2:01.776/2:04.026/2:04.776/2:05.432 - Ghost note
2:05.526 - Missing note
2:07.494/2:07.776 - Ghost note
2:09.416 - Missing note
2:10.026/2:12.744 - Ghost note
2:14.244 - Missing note
2:14.338 - Ghost note. No percussion
2:23.619 - Should be [13] for better PR
>>Not very straightforward & consistent. On some sections, I have no idea what you’re trying to step
Posted at 9:39pm on October 7th, 2023
New York Back Raise (Fisu) [6/10]
> Permission check good.
> File has some minor sync issues stated below. Notes will use original timing.
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> Folder name does not match FFR username.
- 0:05.011 Given the strong piano notes in the start, i would expect you to continue following them, but there are quite a few piano notes missing in this intro. I'm unsure if its intentional or just a bunch of missed notes. For example you chart the 3 piano 16ths at 0:04.543 but not 0:07.543
- 0:10.168 Why is there suddenly a 16th stream now? where did this come from?
- 0:12.793 In 3 seconds we go from barely any notes to straight dense jumpstream. There is little to no change in the song structure and yet we go from 0 to 100 in density. A chart is a representation of the song and its important that the general intensity of the chart should roughly follow the general intensity of the music.
- 0:19.168 Watch out for long anchors like the one on 2. These anchors can be uncomfortable to play and strain the hands unintentionally. Try to keep an eye out for anchors you didn't mean to place.
- 0:22.355 This should be 24ths not 32nds.
- 0:22.668 Again, these first group of notes should be 24ths.
- 0:27.043 Compare the intensity of the music here, and at 0:15.043. The change of intensity of the chart contradicts the change of intensity in the music. Its not really until 0:39.043 that we get a difficulty that matches the music.
- 0:57.793 Compare this section to the start. It does a much better job of representing the music and makes the intro look unfinished.
- 1:14.668 this bpm is slightly too high, leading to 1:14.792 coming in a bit early and messing with the sync of the rest of the song. The beat should be closer to 1:14.796
- 1:15.917 This entire section is quite the difficulty spike. We go from light 160bpm JS with some easy bursts and minijacks to 240bpm dense JS/HS bursts. While there are a few glut bursts in the chart, nothing really compares to this level of density or speed.
- 1:21.979 This is just one of MANY missing notes found in this section.
- 1:29.792 I believe the bpm here is actually closer to 171. It makes a lot of the notes line up better including...
- 1:32.836 listen to these hands here. There should be a steady rhythm but the first note is shorter than the rest. If you listen closely they are actually mistimed.
- 1:47.807 the song is once again out of sync, except this time the notes are coming in a bit late. 1:47.791 is a bit more accurate.
- 2:22.307 This section feels a bit empty compared to whats in the music. This spot especially shows the contrast quite well. There are many 16ths that could be charted but aren't leading to an underwhelming end of the chart.
This chart has quite a few technical errors throughout the entire chart. Missing notes, incorrect rhythms, and bad sync aren't uncommon to find. The chart nails a lot of fundamentals like layering, and the sync is fairly accurate, minus a few sections. But i feel this chart fails to come together as a whole package. Individual sections make sense on their own, but in the grand scheme of the chart can feel mismatched. The difficulty curve of the chart as a whole is off and can lead to sections failing to match the intensity of the music, or being insanely hard/easy for the target audience. While there is a baseline level of skill displayed in this chart, the chart as a whole is unpolished and lacks the quality expected of FFR.