35
28
21
14
7
Sangari 7 :: FFR Batch Submission
Zeta -
Sangari 7 -
The Flashbulb [7.5 / 10]
16th Official Tournament (see thread)
PublicEvents
Released
https://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=4273001&postcount=2
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Sangari 7 (Zeta64)" vs "Sangari 7 (Zeta)"
Simfile Folder Name
Sangari 7 (Zeta64)Note Count
1021Chart Length
2:08Average NPS
8.7141Estimated Difficulty
65.47
First Note
0:11Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -23
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 0 3 - 10 4 - 108Jumps
x 179
Hands
x 46
Quads
x 0
Color Jumps
x 1
Color Hands
x 0
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second8 - 24.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
10 - 20.00 nps 1 Second
17 - 17.00 nps 2 Seconds
26 - 13.00 nps 5 Seconds
57 - 11.40 nps 10 Seconds
103 - 10.30 nps 30 Seconds
288 - 9.60 nps 1 Minute
531 - 8.85 nps
Color Count
x 368 (36.04%)
x 284 (27.82%)
x 2 (0.2%)
x 171 (16.75%)
x 3 (0.29%)
x 16 (1.57%)
x 3 (0.29%)
x 1 (0.1%)
x 173 (16.94%)
Posted at 5:40pm on October 28th, 2023
Sangari 7 (Zeta64) [7.5/10]
>Perms, metadata, sync good
9.370/etc - What are these white notes going to? If the color is just dicksync, then consider using the Colorizer to set these notes to their appropriate snap color
20.422-20.879/etc - The PR on these type of sections sounds like two sets of 4-note trills (instead of the current 8-note trill)
23.979/57.377/1:30.762/1:47.465 - Should be jump. Snare
30.115/1:20.201 - Why a 96th flam? This is the only part of the file that has this
1:52.004/1:56.178/2:00.352/2:04.526 - No hand? CymbalCrash
>>Having the layering focus on the snare really doesn’t capture this song’s dynamics (the other instruments have much more going on). Still, the file is straightforward & consistent
Posted at 5:41pm on October 28th, 2023
Sangari 7
---------
- Permission, sync, metadata good.
- 17.572-17.966: PR on this set of four notes feels off--17.839 at the least should be a high note.
- 23.324: Suggest different column from 22.795.
- 23.979: Suggest column 3 to distinguish from 24.609 sound, and because the minijack at 23.721 is a bit tenuous in the first place imo so this degree of left hand bias feels a little much. Likewise 57.376, 107.463.
- 52.914: Remove here or add at 48.740.
- 53.557: Maybe a jump here to preserve the motif you've been using before, e.g. at 49.396--this sound is still pretty strong, and a [34] jump would acknowledge that while not getting in the way of the upcoming trill pattern.
- 81.480, 85.653: Singles here feel a touch underwhelming.
- 89.972: Ghost note.
- 90.251: Misrhythm, this is on the 32nd at 90.306.
- 95.443, 99.617, etc. (some earlier in the song): Omitting these makes me sad. :c
- 108.779, 117.127: Ghost note? No idea what this is here for.
- This file is fine, well put together for what it is & I do consider it FFR-ready, but it does sadden me to see the more melodic parts of the song get so little emphasis. They're quite beautiful imo, yet the chart spends those sections of the song still mostly dwelling on the same percussive motif that's been going on the whole time, mostly just adding a couple singles here and there or approximating the slightly offbeat percussion to land on the 16th the melody is on. Good to go, but I feel there's a lot more unexplored potential here. [7.5/10]
Posted at 5:22pm on December 1st, 2023
Moving this to the DC Engine as-is, as it's past the 1 month probationary period to submit changes and fixes and has the 'accepted' flag. If you need/want to submit fixes, please DM me directly or let me know.