Necroxus :: FFR Batch Submission
M0nkeyz - Necroxus - Se-U-Ra [7.5 / 10]
16th Official Tournament (see thread)
PublicEvents
Released
https://ffr.fandom.com/wiki/Se-U-Ra

- The sim folder contains additional files that can be removed. [ .ds, .dsx ]

✔️ This chart has been marked as final and shouldn't receive any more changes.

Simfile Folder Name

Necroxus (M0nkeyz)

Note Count

1467

Chart Length

2:24

Average NPS

10.4314

Estimated Difficulty

81.35

First Note

0:03

Ending Note Delay

0:01

Hand Bias

x -13

Framers

0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 - 22 4 - 96

Jumps

x 317

Hands

x 38

Quads

x 0

Color Jumps

x 1

Color Hands

x 0

Color Quads

x 0

Most notes in:

1/3 of a Second
9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
12 - 24.00 nps 1 Second
20 - 20.00 nps 2 Seconds
38 - 19.00 nps 5 Seconds
86 - 17.20 nps 10 Seconds
147 - 14.70 nps 30 Seconds
399 - 13.30 nps 1 Minute
726 - 12.10 nps

Color Count

x 401 (27.33%)
x 328 (22.36%)
x 74 (5.04%)
x 423 (28.83%)
x 77 (5.25%)
x 119 (8.11%)
x 20 (1.36%)
x 5 (0.34%)
x 20 (1.36%)

Largest Note Gaps

5.13s0.8s0.77s0.77s0.77s0.63s0.63s0.6s
35
28
21
14
7

Necroxus (M0nkeyz) [7.5/10]
>Permission good (Blanket)
>Folder contents, metadata good
>Sync good

Playtest Impression, 1.0x Rate - Pretty good

16.077 - might want this note
25.949, 34.154 - (subjective, can ignore) could argue for another minijack to start here. Would then also want a note on 28.000
55.949 - 56.461 - (subjective, can ignore) Had to go to 50% speed to actually hear what this goes to. I’d probably drop this to minijacks for a lighter transition

Pretty reasonable chart. Don’t have any major nitpicks, though I find the transition at 55.436 - 56.461 seems a little weird on 1.0x. Nothing major though, so good to go.

Necroxus (M0nkeyz) [7.5/10]
Permission: OK.
Metadata: OK.
Sync: OK.

Super energetic, plays great. Not too much to technically point out here, it’s dynamic and varied enough that it keeps you engaged throughout the chart and keeps your interest. Few things that I could see being changed here.

12.829: This could be omitted as there is no sound here, however I see what it’s going for. I personally would not have kept this in.
14.282: Feels strange to exclude this note.
16.077: This note is represented earlier, I would place a 16th on 3 here.
23.128 & 23.385: Missing note here.
55.436: I would represent these as the 32nds that are present rather than a 16th jumptrill.
1:36.124: One of these notes on this 12th jump could be moved up to represent the 48th burst happening here. Same with the 24th jump following.
1:37.492: Following the 16th jumpgluts prior, this 32nd section feels very dull pattern-wise. I would suggest switching it up to have it feel more energetic.
1:55.953: These are represented as jumpgluts rather than the jumptrill you had before at 55.436. I recommend, again, representing these as 32nds. The jumpgluts you are placing represent something that sounds different, worth heavily considering.
1:56.979: Ghost note.
1:58.688: Same as 1:36.124.

@zeta
12.829: Removed.
14.283: I feel including this note would distract from the melody that I'm following.
16.077: Oops, added.
23.128: I had this in originally, but it felt super off to me and it's barely audible on 1.0x.
23.385: This note is way too high and far away to include imo.
55.436: The waveform tells me they're there, but it's super hard to hear unless I slow the music down to literally 0.1/0.2.
96.124: I'm not entirely sure I understand this note, do you want me to add 48ths or make them gluts? I purposefully omitted the 48th bursts on these because I think this is way more fun to play and more in line with the rest of the file difficulty wise.
97.492: It's a bit rolly, but I don't think it's that dull.
115.953: No to the 32nds, but I can make this section more consistent with 55.436. I also find the 32nds starting at 116.467 way more prominent.
116.979: Oops, removed.

@tru

25.949, 34.154: I didn't want to connect these sections so I left these notes out, they're kinda hard to hear anyway.
55.949 - 56.461: I'm going to play around with this section a bit more.

Thanks for the notes

Took a second look at the notes and decided to put the 32nds in as per Zeta's suggestion.

A new chart file was uploaded.