Mezzotinto :: FFR Batch Submission
jacobvl39 -
Mezzotinto -
Ruby My Dear [6.5 / 10]
16th Official Tournament (see thread)
PublicTokenPurchasedSecretEvents
Rejected
Simfile Folder Name
Mezzotinto (jacobvl39)
Note Count
2189
Chart Length
2:47
Average NPS
13.3178
Estimated Difficulty
96.67
First Note
0:03
Ending Note Delay
0:01
Hand Bias
Framers
0 - 0
1 - 0
2 - 15
3 - 86
4 - 249
Jumps
Hands
Quads
Color Jumps
Color Hands
Color Quads
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second
11 - 33.00 nps
0.5 Seconds
15 - 30.00 nps
1 Second
25 - 25.00 nps
2 Seconds
44 - 22.00 nps
5 Seconds
101 - 20.20 nps
10 Seconds
189 - 18.90 nps
30 Seconds
530 - 17.67 nps
1 Minute
1038 - 17.30 nps
Color Count
Largest Note Gaps
2.47s1.93s1.3s1.3s1.3s1s1s1s
Posted at 7:13pm on April 3rd, 2023
Trimmed a bit off the end, made some of the bursts more ergonomic
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
MP3 Length changed: 2:55 => 2:45
----------
Note Count changed: 2197 => 2188
Chart Length changed: 2:53 => 2:47
AVG NPS changed: 12.87808 => 13.309
Hand Bias changed: -29 => -22
Posted at 7:09pm on April 27th, 2023
Last update: fixed sync plus a few last-minute rearrangements
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Offset changed: -0.108 => -0.118
----------
Note Count changed: 2188 => 2189
AVG NPS changed: 13.309 => 13.31779
Hand Bias changed: -22 => -21
Posted at 11:32am on November 3rd, 2023
Mezzotinto (jacobvl39)
- Offset's fine.
32.074 - Missing jump.
41.884 - This sound is a bit too sharp to use 48th here, imo.
52.944 - You could make this a [34][34][12][12] jumpjacks here to kind of break up the middle column anchoring.
1:14.791 - Maybe make it to [134] to not force a minijack on column 2 here. (also applies to 2:19.357)
1:15.118 - Feels weird to use singles here.
2:23.596 - [34]?
This chart feels fine to play overall. I'm not the most fond with 32nd or 48th burst choices here since they're sometimes not as sharp for a sound that complements the structure of your chart. Not really my cup of tea, but it's acceptable. [7/10]
Posted at 11:35am on November 3rd, 2023
Mezzotinto (jacobvl39) [6/10]
- Perms, metadata, sync are good
0:29.873 - This note is too subtle, can be removed.
0:33.704-0:33.949, 1:18.704-1:18.949 - I wouldn't necessary use jumps here. This is a streched sample that doesn't have a kick or punch to it.
0:34.642 - I'm not sure about not including a note here.
0:35.335 - Not sure about this being a jump, it's pretty distinct from the jumps coming after that.
0:38.759 - Too subtle to be a jump imo.
*0:41.857-0:41.965 - This is rough to hit. Would recommend changing this.
0:42.998 - Sounds like this should be trills.
0:48.378-0:48.623 - Sounds are sliced here, no need for jumps.
0:49.357 - Can't hear a jump here.
0:51.313-0:51.884 - The jump usage here feels messy, not sure what's going on here. Recommend checking this again.
0:52.291-0:52.454 and other repeating gluts like that - Damn
0:56.041 - Too subtle to be a jump
0:59.397 - Missing note
0:59.954 - Same as 0:42.998. Alternatively, 0:34.642.
1:05.824, 1:08.107 - same as 0:56.041
1:10.471-1:10.512 - I could see these two notes being mirrored - since they come and go.
1:13.487-1:13.772 - Starts earlier than should, please recheck.
1:14.465 - The sounds here are ascending. Feels weird that it's just [34][2][34][2].
1:34.723 - Ghost note? I can hear nothing there.
1:37.291 - Suggest different placement for that, it's not the same as the 4th before it. Maybe a [14] will work.
1:42.346 - Suggest mirroring the last 3 notes since there's a different glitch snare.
1:42.835 - Why [23]? Based on the previous 4th this should be [34].
1:43.161 - Same qualm as 1:14.465
1:48.868 - Why single note?
1:55.063-1:55.878 - Questionable PR all around. Also there's a jump in there (1:55.634) that is misplaced and should be a 96th.
1:57.590 - Veeeeery subtle. Shouldn't be a note there.
2:07.128 - Subtle to be a jump imo.
2:09.656 - Missing note, but kinda subtle anyway.
2:13.324-2:13.813- Questionable PR on the jumps that also accidently form an anchor with the [12] jumps prior.
2:17.563 - There are no 32nds here.
2:22.454 - Better placement for this would be [34]
2:24.411 - Suggest moving this jump to the 16th since that one is more noticable.
2:24.900 - The 32nds start earlier than should.
This chart has a lot of odd placements, odd PR, and some consistency issues as can be seen in some of my notes. It needs a bit more polishing before I could consider it Accepted. It's really close though.
That said, this is a rather unique approach to the chart, I don't think I've seen anything like this in any other file within the level of Mezzotinto, and it can make an interesting challenge for some players.